Tuesday, June 18, 2024 • Welcome to the 💯 Nonsense-Free Zone!
🛍️ Today’s 🔥 Deals on An image of Amazon logo🛒

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Is It Just a Matter of Ping vs. Bling?

Share what you're reading!

Despite the almost identical hardware, Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000 is a matchup of two entirely different approaches to gaming in Wi-Fi routers. This post will highlight their differences.

You might want to check my definition of a gaming router first, though, so we're on the same page.

Netgear XR1000 vs. Asus RT-AX82U
Despite sharing the same hardware specs, the RT-AX92U remains more compact and lighter than the Netgear XR1000.

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Similarities

From its look, the difference between the Asus RT-AX82U and the Netgear XR1000 is almost like that between the former and the Asus RT-AX86U. Not much, that is.

After all, on the outside, the Netgear XR1000 shares some color tones and the lack of fancy game lights with the RT-AX86U. And on the inside, it uses identical hardware to the RT-AX82U.

Both are AX5400 Wi-Fi 6 routers with a 4x4 5GHz band (4800Mbps) and a 2x2 2.4GHz band (570Mbps). Both support the venerable 160MHz channel width, but neither has a multi-gig port. Instead, they come with the standard one Gigabit WAN port and four Gigabit LAN ports.

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Hardware specifications

Netgear XR1000 Nighthawk 
Wi-Fi 6 Pro Gaming Router
Asus RT-AX82U Dual-Band 
Wi-Fi 6 Gaming Router 
Wi-Fi TechnologyDual-Band Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) AX5400Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) AX5400
2.4GHz Wi-Fi Specs2x2 Wi-Fi 6: Up to 574 Mbps2x2 Wi-Fi 6: Up to 574 Mbps
5GHz Wi-Fi Specs4X4 Wi-Fi 6: Up to 4804 Mbps4X4 Wi-Fi 6: Up to 4804 Mbps
Backward Compatibility802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac
AP ModeYesYes
Mesh-readyNoYes (AiMesh)
Channel Support20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz20 MHz, 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz
Gigabit Network Port4x LAN, 1x WAN4x LAN, 1x WAN
Multi-Gig PortsNoneNone
Link AggregationNoYes (LAN 1 and LAN 2)
Dual-WANNoYes (WAN + LAN4 or USB)
Parental ControlYes Yes 
Built-in Online ProtectionYes 
(Subscription required)
USB1 x USB-A USB 3.0 
(Storage or Printer)
1 x USB-A USB 3.0 
(Storage, Printer, or Celluar)
Mobile AppNetgear NighthawkAsus Router
QoSYes (Excellent)Yes (Excellent)
Processing Power1.5 GHz tri-core CPU, 
256 MB Flash, 512 MB RAM
1.5 GHz tri-core CPU, 
256 MB Flash, 512 MB RAM
Dimensions11.61 x 7.87 x 2.51 in 
(295 x 200 x 64 mm)
9.52 x 6.45 x 3.93 inc 
(242 x 164 x 100 mm)
Weight1.32 lb (600 g)1.63 lbs (740 g)
AntennasFour (Detachable)Four (Non-detachable)
Game FeaturesGame-oriented DumaOS 3.0Front Gaming Lights, 
Mobile Game Mode, 
Game Port (LAN1)
US Price
(at launch)
Hardware specifications: Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Differences

There are a lot of differences between these two, thanks to their completely different firmware.

Netgear XR1000 13
The maroon ventilation gill makes Netgear XR1000 quite similar to the look of the Asus RT-AX86U.

The firmware and all that implies

The Asus runs the same firmware used in all other Asus routers. So it's very similar to most other Asus routers with the same web interface and a matching set of features and settings. Among those, you'll find the common Dual-WAN, Link Aggregation, AiMesh, AiProtection, and so on.

The RT-AX82U even dedicates its LAN 1 port as the game port. Plug a wired device into this port, and it'll be prioritized for gaming.

The Netgear, on the other hand, is the first that uses the game-oriented DumaOS 3.0. As a result, despite having "Nighthawk" in the name, it has almost nothing in common with Netgear's other Nighthawk routers. It has no Dual-WAN or Link Aggregation.

There's the Armor protection feature, but that requires a $70/year subscription. To manage this feature, you'll have to use the Nighthawk app. This app, very disappointingly, doesn't have access to any of the router's gaming features. Instead, it treats the XR1000 just like any other non-gaming Nighthawk router.

The different approach to online gaming

In my opinion, for a router to be qualified as a gaming one, it needs to have at least one of the three things:

  • A gaming VPN
  • The ability to control latency
  • A game-related QoS engine

Neither of the two has a gaming VPN. They both have VPN features—good ones, in fact—but they are just regular VPNs.

On the other two, the routers do different things. The Asus manages latency via unique settings and port-forwarding automatically applied to a specific game. The Netgear can detect ping in real-time and force game consoles to connect to a game server or player of your choice.

Both have excellent QoS, though that of the Netgear offers more visual in terms of customization.


The Netgear XR1000 is a bit of a mundane router. It's not ugly but looks just like any other router with four detachable antennas.

The RT-AX82U, on the other hand, comes with a non-detachable antenna and, most importantly, a huge mood lighting LED on the front that the user can program to the max. This light is something for those into flash blinding gear.


If you have used an Asus router before, you'll love the RT-AX82U. It has a responsive web interface and a mobile app that you can use to manage almost anything, including its lighting and gaming features. It's fun to use.

The XR1000 has a very rich interface, like that of a real operating system. Unforatuenly it seems DumaOS 3.0 is a bit too heavy for the router's hardware.

As a result, on the Netgear, things take a long time to happen. You might have to wait for a few seconds, sometimes even more than 10 seconds, for stuff to materialize when you move from one section to another.

So it's a bit of a dilemma: It's most beneficial because it gives you real-time information, but working with it can be painful. That's not to mention the interface was buggy during my testing. This will more than likely change via firmware updates, however.

Asus RT-AX82U 20
If mood lighting could boost the skilz, the Asus RT-AX82U would be the best gaming router on Earth.

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Performance and ratings

Initially, the two seem to have almost identical performances. In fact, in tests with a single 2x2 Wi-Fi 6 client, their numbers were virtually identical.

However, the Netgear was clearly behind the Asus in my extra tests, where I used two Wi-Fi 6 clients and copied data from one to another. Likely that was due to firmware that's not yet optimized.

Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Ratings

Asus RT-AX82U's Rating

9 out of 10
Asus RT-AX82U 19
8.5 out of 10
9.5 out of 10
Ease of Use
8.5 out of 10
9.5 out of 10


Excellent performance

Beautiful design with tons of helpful networking, game-related features, and settings

Robust web UI, well-designed mobile app

Comparatively affordable


No support for WTFast Gamer VPN

No multi-gig network port

Network storage performance (when hosting a portable drive) could use some improvement

Not wall-mountable

XR1000 vs. RT-AX82U Wi-Fi Performance
Netgear XR1000 vs. Asus RT-AX82U: Wi-Fi performance

Netgear Nighthawk XR1000's Rating

7.6 out of 10
Netgear XR1000 12
8 out of 10
8.5 out of 10
Ease of Use
7 out of 10
7 out of 10


Sophisticated game-centric firmware

Fast Wi-Fi speeds and reliable performance

Robust web UI, beautiful hardware design

Useful mobile app, wall-mountable


Expensive but underpowered - items of the web interface can take a long time to fully load

Limited Wi-Fi settings, sluggish user interface

Mobile app can't manage any gaming features

No multi-gig port, Dual-WAN, or Link Aggregation

Online protection and VPN require subscriptions

Buggy -- firmware needs some serious updates; no mesh option

Which to get

Looking at the ratings and performance chart above, you probably think it's quite clear that the Asus RT-AX82U is the better choice. And you're right for the most part. I have no problem recommending it over the Netgear. It's an all-around excellent router for gamers and home users alike.

However, if you're a true gamer living in a part of the world with high latency, the Netgear Nighthawk XR1000 is the only Wi-Fi 6 router, for now, that can make a big difference. In this case, it's the router to get. That's despite its current somewhat unfinished status, which sure will improve via firmware updates.

Looking for other Wi-Fi solution matchups? Check them all out here.

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily.  

  1. Strictly no bigotry, falsehood, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming, including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product, a brand, a piece of content, a webpage, or a person (•).
  2. You're presumed and expected to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments - questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

Thank you!

(•) If you have subscription-related issues or represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.

2 thoughts on “Asus RT-AX82U vs. Netgear XR1000: Is It Just a Matter of Ping vs. Bling?”

  1. Hi Dong

    A slight issue near the end of this comparison for the wi-fi performance graph. The graph states “RT-AX86U vs RT-AX82U”. This should ofcourse say “RT-AX82U vs XR1000”.


Leave a Comment