Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Top-notch Tri-band Power

Asus AX11000 Side 1
The Asus GT-AX11000 is a capable and versatile Wi-Fi 6 router.

This post aims to help you make a quick decision between these two similarly-specs tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers: The Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200.

Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Similarities

These two are the top-notch tri-band routers on the market. Both massive Wi-Fi 6 machines capable of delivering 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 speeds on 160MHz channels (up to 4.8Gbps) in a single Wi-Fi connection.

Since there are only 2×2 clients on the market, for now, they have the speeds up to 2.4Gbps, which is still crazy fast.

READ NOW:  Dual-band vs. Tri-band Wi-Fi and that Burning Bandwidth Question

Both also have a 2.5Gbps network port and support Link Aggregation to deliver faster-than-Gigabit wired speeds. They also share the same number of Gigabit network ports, including one WAN and four LANs. The two delivered similar Wi-Fi coverage in my testing.

Finally, both routers have a full web user interface and a useful mobile app.

Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Hardware specifications

Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Differences

The RAX200 is one of the coolest routers you can get. It looks like hardware coming out from the StarWars universe. The Asus GT-AX11000, on the other hand, is quite ugly, being a square box with loose detachable antennas.

But the GT-AX11000 has a ton of extras, including AiMesh, AiProtection, and game-specific features. It also includes in-depth Wi-Fi settings and useful networking tools, like Wake-on-LAN.

The RAX200, on the other hand, has a standard feature set with modest Wi-Fi settings. Netgear later added the Armor protection to it via a firmware update, but this feature requires a $70 yearly subscription.

The RAX200 works well right out of the box. Wi-Fi 6 clients consistently connect to it at full speeds. The GT-AX11000 requires a bit of tweaking before it works well, likely due to (initial) buggy firmware. But Asus pushes out new firmware updates regularly.

Netgear RAX200 Router
The Netgear RAX200 is a massive and intriguing-looking Wi-Fi 6 router.

Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Performance

The two routers delivered a very similar performance in my testing, with the Netgear edging out the Asus by a small margin. That’s true for both Wi-Fi and NAS performance when they hosted a storage device (as shown here.)

GT AX11000 vs RAX200

Asus GT-AX1100 vs. Netgear RAX200: Ratings

ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX11000 Gaming Router

8.3

Performance

8.0/10

Features

9.5/10

Design and Setup

8.0/10

Value

7.5/10

Pros

  • Fast and reliable Wi-Fi performance with excellent range
  • Lots of useful features for home users
  • Unique and effective settings for online gaming
  • Multi-Gig network port, Dual-WAN, Link Aggregation
  • Mesh ready

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Bulky design, loose antennas, non-wall-mountable
  • Fewer LAN ports than previous model
  • Long boot-up time, buggy (at launch), fluctuating Wi-Fi throughputs

Netgear Nighthawk AX12 12-Stream AX11000 Tri-Band WiFi 6 Router (RAX200)

$499.99
8

Performance

9.0/10

Features

7.5/10

Design and Setup

8.5/10

Value

7.0/10

Pros

  • Reliable and fast performance
  • Eye-catching design
  • Helpful mobile app, robust web UI
  • Multi-Gig support (2.5Gbps)

Cons

  • Comparatively super-expensive with nothing extra
  • Shallow Wi-Fi customization, spartan feature set
  • Comparatively low CPU clock speed
  • No 5Gbps or 10Gbps LAN port, not wall-mountable

Which to get

Get the Asus GT-AX11000 if you’re a gamer or an advanced user who enjoys tinkering with the settings. That’s also my personal choice.

If you want something fast and reliable with minimum effort, and don’t care about gaming or online protection features, the Netgear RAX200 is a better fit.

Looking to compare other Wi-Fi solutions? Check them all out here.

Found a typo? Please report by highlighting it and pressing Ctrl Enter Thank you! ❤️

You might also like

Leave a comment below. (Subject to approval. No spam or profanity, please!)

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: