Friday, September 17th, 2021 • Welcome to the 💯 No-Nonsense Tech Zone! • 😷 Get Vaxxed 💉!

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: It Boils Down to Privacy

This TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200 matchup is a fight between two well-performing mesh systems. Sure, they look distinctive enough, but there is much more to them than meets the eye.

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200
TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: It’s quite easy to see the differences between these two.

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: Similarities

First of all, I consider each of these the best mesh system to date from the respective vendor. Neither is the best on the market as a whole, but compared to their cousins, they both sure have an edge, especially when you consider the cost.

The two are available in a 2-pack, and you can scale up the coverage by adding more units. Design-wise, they are good-looking in their own way — with identical-looking hardware units –, but both can topple fairly easily. You can’t mount either unless you get some mounting accessories.

Both use a vendor-assisted mobile app for setup and ongoing management. Both also use tri-band hardware with a dynamic backhaul and share two bands of the same specs. They also work via a wired backhaul.

Finally, neither has a USB port — they can’t work as a mini NAS server. And that’s about it. Their similarities end there.

See also  Wi-Fi 6 Explained in Layman's Terms: The Real Speed, Range, and More

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: Hardware specifications

Full NameTP-Link Deco X5700 AX5700 
Whole-Home Mesh Wi-Fi Router
Netgear Orbi AX4200 Whole Home 
Tri-band Mesh WiFi 6 System 
(model RBK752)
Hardware ModelDeco X5700Router  / Satellite 
RBR750 / RBS750
(Of same physical size)
Mesh AvailabilityMultiple identical routersRouter + Satellite(s)
Dimensions (each unit)8.3 × 5.1 × 4.8 in 
(210.5 × 130 × 123 mm)
9.1 x 7.2 x 2.8 in
(23.11 x 18.28 x 7.11 cm)
Weight (each unit)1.6 lbs (722 g)1.9 lbs (862 g)
Wi-Fi SpecsTri-band X5700Tri-band AX4200
5GHz-1 BandAX: 3×3, up to 3843MbpsAX: 4×4, up to 2400Mbps
5GHz-2 BandAX: 2×2, up to 1201MbpsAX: 2×2, up to 1201Mbps
2.4GHz Band2.4GHz AX:  up to 574 Mbps2.4GHz AX:  up to 574 Mbps
Dedicated Backhaul BandDynamic5GHz-2 (Permanent)
Wired Backhaul SupportYesYes (5GHz-2 still not available to clients)
Processors1.5GHz Quad-CoreQuad-core 1.4 GHz processor
MemoryUndisclosed512 MB NAND flash and 1GB RAM
AP (bridge mode) SupportYes 
(Single router or a system)
Yes
(Single router or a system)
Channel Width Support20MHz, 40MHz, 80MHz, 160MHz20MHz, 40MHz, 80MHz
Backward Compatibility802.11b/g/n/ac802.11b/g/n/ac
Mobile AppTP-Link Deco (Forced)Netgear Orbi (optional)
Web InterfaceYes (limited)Yes
Gigabit Port1x Auto-Sensing1x  WAN, 3x  LAN / 2x LAN
Multi-Gig Port1x 2.5Gbps Auto-SensingNone
Link AggregationNoneWAN only (WAN+LAN1)
Price (at launch)$399.99 (2-pack)$450 (2-pack), 
$515 (3-pack)
Hardware specifications: TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: Differences

There are a lot of differences between these two.

As a mesh system, the Orbi comes in two types of hardware: A router and a satellite. The Deco, however, uses the same hardware — you get two identical routers.

The Deco has slightly more processing power, and one of its 5GHz bands has higher Wi-Fi specs. Most importantly, it comes with a 2.5Gbps auto-sensing port and supports the 160MHz channel bandwidth. It’s slated to be faster, at least at the router unit.

The Orbi has more network ports and supports Link Aggregation on the WAN side. When working with a supported modem, you can combine its WAN port and LAN1 into a 2Gbps WAN connection.

Deco X5700 vs Obi AX4200 1
TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: The latter’s router unit has more network ports than the former and WAN Link Aggregating. However, it doesn’t have a multi-gig port.

On the inside, the Netgear is a more satisfying system. For one, it comes with a full web interface and therefore has a lot more options in network settings and features. You also can use it via local management completely independent from Netgear. The Orbi app is just an option — you don’t have to use it.

The TP-Link, on the other hand, like all Deco hardware, requires the mobile app to work. You can’t set up or manage your network without a live internet connection. As a result, it’s more of a privacy risk.

The Deco does have a web interface, but it’s purposely neutered to include just a few basic functions, such as status viewing or firmware update.

Both the Deco and Orbi come with add-on subscription-based online protection features called HomeShield Pro and Netgear Armor, that cost around $70/year. That of the Netgear is much more comprehensive and also includes protection software for multiple devices.

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: Performance

I tested both in a wireless setup.

Thanks to the multi-gig port and the 160MHz channel width support, the Deco proved to be much faster at the router unit. At the satellite, though, the two were very similar, with the Orbi having a bit of an edge in certain cases.

TP Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200 Performance
(★) 4×4 client (router) and and 3×3 client (satellite)

TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200 : Ratings

TP-Link Deco X5700 AX5700 Tri-Band Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi 6 System

8

Performance

8.0/10

Features

7.0/10

Design and Setup

8.5/10

Value

8.5/10

Pros

  • Excellent Wi-Fi performance and coverage
  • Tri-band with multi-gig port and 160MHz channel width support
  • User-friendly, comparatively affordable
  • Good-looking

Cons

  • Spartan Wi-Fi customization, network settings, and features
  • Only one Multi-Gig port per hardware unit
  • App and login account required
  • HomeShield Pro requires a monthly subscription, limited web interface, impractical design
  • No USB or additional Gigabit network ports

Netgear Orbi Whole Home Tri-Band Mesh Wi-Fi 6 System (RBK752)

$379.99
8.5

Performance

8.5/10

Features

8.0/10

Design and Setup

8.5/10

Value

9.0/10

Pros

  • Fast, reliable Wi-Fi with large coverage
  • Relatively affordable
  • Useful, well designed mobile app
  • Support WAN 2Gbps Link Aggregation
  • Full web interface with all common settings and features

Cons

  • No 160MHz channel support, limited Wi-Fi customization
  • Not compatible with Wi-Fi 5 Orbi hardware
  • Few LAN ports; No Multi-Gig, Dual-WAN, or LAN Link Aggregation, or USB port
  • The fast 5GHz band only works as backhaul, even in a wired setup

Either of these two will make an excellent choice for a large of 4500 ft2 (408 m2) or so, especially one that you can’t run network cables.

So, if you feel a bit cavalier about your privacy and can live with the forced cloud-based management, the TP-Link Deco X5700 is an excellent choice, especially considering its lower cost.

On the other hand, if you want to have more options in terms of settings and the control of your own home network, the Netgear Orbi AX4200 is totally worth the extra cost.

It’s your call.

Looking to compare other Wi-Fi solutions? Check them all out here.

☕ Appreciate the content? Buy Dong a Ko-fi!

8 thoughts on “TP-Link Deco X5700 vs Netgear Orbi AX4200: It Boils Down to Privacy”

  1. Dong:

    Thanks for the good info and reviews. I have a large house. All wired with CAT 6. 1 Gig fiber coming in. I can wire all the stationary devices, TV, Receivers, Apple TVs, etc. All the home automation stuff needs WiFi and all family members and guests. Looking at Asus ZenWiFi XT8, Orbi AX6000 or AX4200. Cannot decide. Advice?

    Thanks

    Reply

Leave a Comment