Saturday, November 30, 2024 • Welcome to the 💯 Nonsense-Free Zone!
🛍️ Today’s 🔥 Deals on An image of Amazon logo🛒

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Same Same, yet Can’t Be Any More Different

Share what you're reading!

This is the Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300 matchup I promised in the review of the former.

Asus's latest Wi-Fi 6E router is the answer to the Netgear's counterpart, whether or not anyone wants to admit it. Sharing the exact same Wi-Fi specs and processing power, the two seem to be cut from the same cloth. Or are they?

There are a lot of similarities between the two, but yet, they can't be any more different. Let's drive in!

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Though smaller in physical size, the firmware has everything the latter has and much more.
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: The former is small enough to fit on top of the latter, with room to spare.

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: One gives the other a good run for its money

The RT-AXE7800 and the RAXE300 are two eye-catching Wi-Fi routers. One looks like a spaceship, and the other, well, a dead spider, but in a cool way.

While I love the RAXE300 for its excellent appearance, the RT-AXE7800 is much more practical. It's more compact, lighter, and wall-mount-ready right out of the box.

In many ways, the two represent Asus and Netgear, respectively, in designs and Wi-Fi approaches. And in that sense, the RT-AXE7800 shares the good and the bad of the RAXE300. And then, it has a bit more. Actually, a whole lot more.

Asus RT-AXE7800 Router Top FrontNetgear RAXE300 Nighthawk Wi-Fi 6E router 1 6
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: The Netgear is larger and more sleek-looking than the Asus.

With that, let's pitch them against each other in the hardware specs.

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Hardware specifications

Asus RT-AXE7800 Router Antennas UpNetgear RAXE300 Nighthawk Wi-Fi 6E router 1 5
Asus AXE7800 tri-band Wi-Fi 6E RouterNetgear Nighthawk
8-Stream AXE7800
Tri-Band Wi-Fi 6E Router
ModelAsus RT-AXE7800Netgear RAXE300
Wi-Fi TechnologyTri-Band AXE7800
First Band2.4GHz 2x2 Wi-Fi 6 
Up to 574Mbps
(20/40MHz)
Second Band5GHz 4x4 Wi-Fi 6
Up to 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
Third Band6GHz 2x2 Wi-Fi 6E
Up to 2402Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
Backward Compatibility802.11a/b/g/n/ac
AP ModeYes
Mesh-readyYes
(AiMesh)
No
Gigabit Network Port1 x WAN/LAN
3 x LAN
1x WAN/WAN
4x LAN
Multi-Gig Network Port1x 2.5Gbps LAN/WAN
LAN Link AggregationYes
WAN Link AggregationYesNo
Dual-WANYesNo
USB1 x USB 3.0
(USB-A)
1x USB 3.0
(USB-C)
Mobile AppAsus Router Netgear Nighthawk
Processing Power1.7GHz quad-core CPU, 
256MB Flash, 512MB RAM
Dimensions 9.57 x 8.78 x 6.1 in
(24.3 x 22.3 x 15.5 cm)
11.86 x 8.16 x 3.23 in
(30.13 x 20.79 x 8.2 cm)
Weight2.28 lbs (1.33 kg)2.23 lb (1.01kg)
Firmware Version
(at review)
3.0.0.4.388_215931.0.4.52_1
Power Input100-240V
Power Consumption
(per 24 hours)
≈185 Wh≈200Wh
Release DateSeptember 2022January 2022
Price
(at publication)
$329.99$399.99
Netgear Wi-Fi 6E routers' hardware specifications: Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE500
Asus RT-AXE7800 Router PortsNetgear RAXE300 Nighthawk Wi-Fi 6E router 1 2
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: The latter has one more Gigabit LAN port than the former. Whether or not that's enough to justify its much bulkier physical size depends on your taste and usage.

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Better firmware for the win

The two are almost identical in hardware specs.

Both are tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers on the Wi-Fi front, of which only the 5GHz has the top-tier treatment. Their 2.4GHz and 6GHz bands are middling with the latter's bandwidth caps at only 2400Mbps.

Both routers share the same processing power and the number of network ports. There's only one 2.5GbE Multi-Gig port that can work either as a LAN or a WAN.

That said, what sets them apart is the firmware. The Netgear uses a proprietary firmware of which the local web interface has been slowly neutered over the years to coerce users into using the Nighthawk mobile app. You need this app—which requires a login account—and pay for a handful of subscriptions to get the most out of the router.

Netgear and the web interface: It's a losing battle for the end-users

The Asus, on the other hand, runs on an open-source Linux-based firmware that gives you a robust web user interface and an optional Asus Router mobile app. No matter which you use, there's no need to sign up for a login account with the vendor. On top of that, it shares many features and settings with other Asus routers—all free for life.

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Both routers are unique in their own way, but overall, the former has significantly more to offer at a noticeably lower cost.

Asus routers: Common features and settings

And last but not least, the Asus RT-AX7800 is mesh-ready. You can use it as the primary router or a satellite node of an AiMesh system. (Considering it has no additional 5GHz band, it's best to use it with wired backhauling.)

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Grading and performance

Asus RT-AXE7800's Rating

8.6 out of 10
Asus RT-AXE7800 Router Box Content
Performance
9 out of 10
Features
9 out of 10
Ease of Use
8 out of 10
Value
8.5 out of 10

Pros

Excellent performance with tons of network settings with an excellent feature set, free online protection, and Parental Controls

AiMesh 2.0 support with Mult-Gig wired backhauling as a satellite

Super-flexible network ports for Dual-WAN and LAN/WAN Link Aggregations

Compact and practical design; relatively affordable

Cons

Only one Multi-Gig port

Middling 6GHz band

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300 Router Matchup Performance
Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: The two routers share similar Wi-Fi performance, but the former is much faster when working as a mini NAS server with a portable SSD connected to its USB port.

Netgear Nighthawk RAXE300's Rating

7.8 out of 10
Netgear RAXE300 Nighthawk Wi-Fi 6E router 1 5
Performance
8 out of 10
Features
7 out of 10
Ease of Use
8 out of 10
Value
8 out of 10

Pros

Wi-Fi 6E-ready with excellent performance

Flexible 2.5Gbps LAN/WAN port, USB-C

Robust web interface, helpful (optional) mobile app

Cool fanless, wall-mount-ready design

Cons

Middling 6GHz specs, no standard Remote Management via Dynamic DNS

No 10Gbps port, only one 2.5Gbps port; not-well-thought-out Wi-Fi on/off button

Limited Wi-Fi settings and online protection/Parental Controls require a mobile app and subscription

Mediocre NAS performance when hosting a portable SSD; 100-120V power adapter

Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Which to get

At a friendly price, the Asus RT-AXE7800 is a much better deal than the Netgear RAXE300.

In fact, the only thing the Netgear has going for itself in this matchup is the unique spaceship-like design. Other than that, it's overpriced and stacked against the Asus counterpart.

However, the Netgear hit the market much earlier, and if you already have gotten it, there's no need to ditch it for the Asus. In the end, in terms of Wi-Fi experience, the two are very similar.

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal. You're in the no-nonsense zone and that applies BOTH ways.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily.  

  1. Strictly no bigotry, falsehood, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming, including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product, a brand, a piece of content, a webpage, or a person (•).
  2. You're presumed and expected to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments - questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

Thank you!

(•) If you have subscription-related issues or represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.

7 thoughts on “Asus RT-AXE7800 vs. Netgear RAXE300: Same Same, yet Can’t Be Any More Different”

  1. Thanks for the informative reviews!
    I have a 3-level house & wondering if the Asus AXE7800 is compatible with my existing Netgear Wifi range extender (AC1900) in case it’s needed.

    Reply
    • An extender is generally compatible with any router, Dave—more on extenders here. However, in your case, since the extender uses Wi-Fi 5, it’ll require the router (Wi-Fi 6/E) to work in the compatibility mode. So, using it would make your wireless network slower (on the 5GHz band) though chances are the impact is minimal since you likely have other Wi-Fi 5 devices in the network anyway.

      Reply
  2. Hi,

    Thank you for this excellent comparison. I’ve read the review of the Asus RT-AXE7800 and have a couple of questions. You specifically mention the Netgear is fanless, can I assume the Asus isn’t? If so, is it noisy? How many concurrent client devices can the Asus handle?

    I live in a 3 storey house with ethernet cable between the first 2 floors. I have a fibre connection with approx 500Mb download. I have a budget of around £400 to spend on a new WiFi system. I was looking at the Neat WiFi Pro until I found your review. I then purchased the Deco X75 Pro, but returned it after a few days due to the subscription requirement for parental controls. I’m wondering if the Asus would be a good fit for me, as I’m not sure I need a mesh system? I get by at the moment with my single ISP provided router and have coverage all over the house.

    Reply
    • Sorry, meant to say the ethernet connection on the middle floor is in my bedroom, hence the question regarding the fan/noise!

      Reply

Leave a Comment

🎯