Tuesday, February 7, 2023 β€’ Welcome to the πŸ’― No-Nonsense Zone!
πŸ›οΈ Check out Today’s πŸ”₯Amazon logoDeals! πŸ›’

Wi-Fi 7 Explained (vs Wi-Fi 6/E): How It Will Slowly Be a Real Game-Changer

Share what you're reading!

You must have heard of Wi-Fi 7 — the standard that comes after Wi-Fi 6E. There has been a lot of buzz about it since the end of 2021.

And in late February 2022, Qualcomm announced the first chip supporting the standard, the FastConnect 7800, effectively turning Wi-Fi 7 into a real thing that’s officially on the horizon. You can expect more vendors to follow suit this year.

While exciting, the new wireless standard is not intended to and will not “replace Ethernet,” as you might have read somewhere. Wi-Fi would never replace wired connections, both in performance and reliability. They are just two different things.

Wi-Fi vs Wired

Wi-Fi: Partial bandwidth and always Half-Duplex. Data moves using a portion of a band (spectrum), known as a channel, in one direction at a time. You can think of Wi-Fi as the walkie-talkie in voice communication.

Wired: Full bandwidth and (generally) Full-Duplex. Data travel using the entire cable’s bandwidth and in both ways simultaneously. That’s similar to a phone call in voice communication.

Wi-Fi beats wired in terms of convenience and hardware design options. Wired beats Wi-Fi in everything else.

You’ll find more information below, but to cut to the chase, it’ll be another year or so before you can purchase a Wi-Fi 7 router, and it might be even longer until you can get your device to support it. Think late 2023.

In the meantime, and even when Wi-Fi 7 is officially available, your existing equipment of current standards will remain relevant.

Dong’s note: I first published this post on November 19, 2021, and last updated it on April 8, 2022, with up-to-date information on the new Wi-Fi standard.

The current Wi Fi 6E Routers on the market
In a couple of years, these cutting-edge Wi-Fi 6e routers will be rendered “old-fashioned” by Wi-Fi 7. But they won’t be useless.

What is Wi-Fi 7

The name alone is telling. It’s the 7th generation of Wi-Fi, the most common way to connect local devices locally and, hence, to the Internet.

Technically, Wi-Fi 7 is the friendly name of the 802.11be standard, like Wi-Fi 6 to 802.11ax, Wi-Fi 5 to 802.11ac, etc. It’s much easier to remember that 7 comes after and is “more” than 6.

Like all previous Wi-Fi standards, Wi-Fi 7 will be backward compatible. Your existing devices will be able to connect to a Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster (router or access point), and so will a Wi-Fi 7 client to a host of an older standard.

But to truly enjoy the benefit of Wi-Fi 7, you will need new hardware on both ends of a connection. And on some computers, you might be able to do that via an add-on adapter — like how you can upgrade many existing computers to Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 6E.

With that, let’s find out what will make Wi-Fi 7 different from existing standards.

Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6 (E): Four key items to turn it a game-changer

In many ways, Wi-Fi 7 is the combo of Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E. It also uses all three bands, including 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and 6GHz.

The 6GHz band is still where the latest standard can deliver top speeds, but Wi-Fi 7 will also have unprecedented improvements in the other two bands.

Keep in mind that Wi-Fi 7 shares similar theoretical ranges as existing standards that use the same frequencies. But thanks to improvements in all aspects, it can have a longer effective range, though, that remains to be seen.

There are four important (and exciting) new items in Wi-Fi 7.

1. The all-new 320MHz channel width

The first is the new and much wider channel width, up to 320MHz or double that of Wi-Fi 6/E.

Organically, this new channel width is only available on the 6GHz band, with up to three 320MHz channels. However, Wi-Fi 7 can combine portions of the 6GHz and 5GHz bands to create this new bandwidth — more in the Multi-Link Operation section below.

I detailed Wi-Fi channels in this post, but generally, the new channel width means Wi-Fi 7 can double the base speed, from 1.2Gbps per stream (160MHz) to 2.4Gbps per stream (320MHz).

So, in theory, a 4×4 broadcaster 6GHz Wi-Fi 7 can have up to 9.6 Gbps of bandwidth — or 10Gbps when rounded up.

In reality, depending on the actual configuration, Wi-Fi 7 routers and access points will be available in different speed grades, including those offering bandwidths higher or lower than 10Gbps on the 6GHz band.

Wi-Fi 7 also supports double the amount of partial streams, up to 16. As a result, technically, a 16-stream (16×16) Wi-Fi 7 6GHz band can deliver up to over 40Gbps of bandwidth, especially when considering the new QAM support below.

(We’ll likely only see 2×2 and maybe 4×4 specs on the receivers’ end with Wi-Fi 7. Existing Wi-Fi 6 and 6E so far only have seen 2×2 clients and up to 4×4 on the broadcasters.)

Again, to use the new 320MHz channel width, you will need a compatible client. Existing clients will connect using 160MHz at best. And in reality, the 160MHz will likely be the realistic sweet-spot bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7, just like the 80MHz in the case of Wi-Fi 6.

2. The 4K-QAM

QAM or quadrature amplitude modulation is a way to manipulate the radio wave to pack more information in the Hertz.

Wi-Fi 6 supports 1024-QAM, which itself is already impressive. However, Wi-Fi 7 will have four times that, or 4096-QAM. Greater QAM is always better.

As a result, Wi-Fi 7 will have a much higher speed and efficiency than previous standards when working with supported clients.

Wi-Fi 6/EWi-Fi 7
Max Channel
(Up to 3 on the 5GHz band and 7 on the 6GHz band)
(Up to 3 channels on the 6GHz band)
Highest Modulation Order1024-QAM4096-QAM
Max Number
of Spatial Streams
Max Bandwidth
Per Stream
Theoretical Full Band Bandwidth9.6Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7: Theoretical data rates

Multi-Link Operation or MLO is the most exciting and promising feature of Wi-Fi 7.

In a nutshell, MLO is Wi-Fi band aggregation. Like Link Aggregation (or bonding) in wired networking, MLO allows combining two Wi-Fi bands, 5GHz and 6GHz, into a single Wi-Fi network/connection.

The bonded link is also available in two modes: load balance or failover.

The former allows for combining the bandwidth of both bands into a single link. It’s excellent for those wanting to get the fastest possible wireless speed but requires support on the client end to work.

The latter, however, only requires support from the broadcasting side and can be a game-changer in a wireless mesh setup. With failover MLO, we can potentially count on having no signal drop or brief disconnection. And it’s also when seamless handoff (or roaming) can become truly seamless.

On top of that, on each band, a connection can also intelligently pick the best channel, or channel width, in real-time. In other words, it can channel-hop, just like Bluetooth, though likely less frequently.

(Up to Wi-Fi 6E, a Wi-Fi connection between two direct devices takes place in a single band, using a fixed channel, at a time.)

This new capability will help increase the efficiency of Wi-Fi 7’s range, allowing all of its bands to deliver faster speed over longer distances than previous standards.

In more ways than one, MLO is the best alternative to the existing so-called “Smart Connect” — using the same SSID (network name) and password for all the bands of a broadcaster — which doesn’t always work as smartly as expected.

Clearly, how MLO pans out remains to be seen but there seems to be no downside to this new capability.

Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6 Data Rates
Wi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6: Data Rates

4. Automated Frequency Coordination

Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) applies mostly to outdoor 6GHz Wi-Fi applications, but it works indoors, too.

In an environment, there can be existing (incumbent) applications that already use the spectrum. For example, fixed satellite services (FSS) or broadcast companies might have already had licenses to use certain parts of the band.

As a newcomer, Wi-Fi (6E and 7) must not impact those existing services — a concept similar to the use of DFS channels in the 5GHz band.

That’s when AFC comes into play. The idea is that all new 6GHz broadcasters check with a registered database in real-time to confirm their operation will not negatively impact other registered members, including other Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters.

The support for AFC means each Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster will have its own free airspace to operate, meaning vendors can use more power and more flexible antenna designs.

In short, AFC compliance will help a Wi-Fi broadcaster improve range and connection speeds by preemptively creating “private” airspace dependent on the current real-world situation, in which it can operate without the constraint of regulations, which is the case of Wi-Fi 6 and older standards.

A crude AFC analogy

Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) is like checking with the local authorities for permission to close off sections of city streets for a drag race block party.

When approved, the usual traffic and parking laws no longer apply to the area, and the organizers can determine how fast traffic can flow, etc.

Still, AFC works best when there is enough air space for the number of broadcasters in a particular location at any given time.

Other improvements

On top of that, Wi-Fi 7 will also have the support for Multi Resource Unit or Multi-RU. Multi-RU is part of the behind-the-scene technologies that increase the efficiency of Wi-Fi, which also includes MU-MIMO and OFDMA.

In Wi-Fi 7, Multi-RU is created by “puncturing the operating channel using the 20MHz granularity”. That’s very technical, but the point is to actively avoid transmitting on frequencies that are locally saturated or unauthorized by regulations.

Other than Wi-Fi itself, my take is that the support for Multi-Gig wired networking, specifically 10Gbps network ports, will be commonplace in Wi-Fi 7 routers and access points.

Multi-Gig has to be common in Wi-Fi 7 hardware since the wireless speeds will have gotten are too great for the good old Gigabit standard. And Multi-Gig is great — it’s the way of the future.

Wi-Fi cheatsheet

Common NameStandardAvailabilityTop Speed per StreamOperating 
Security ProtocolFrequency BandsStatus
N/A802.11g200354Mbps20 MHzOpen
Wi-Fi 4802.11n
or Wireless N
Wi-Fi 5802.11ac 2012433Mbps
60 GHzLimited Use
Wi-Fi 6802.11ax20191200Mbps
Wi-Fi 6E802.11axe
on 6GHz
Wi-Fi 7802.11be2023
Wi-Fi Standards in Brief

The takeaway

Wi-Fi 7 seems to combine the fragmentations in Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6e to form a uniform approach to Wi-Fi that deliver faster speeds and truly reliable connectivity.

The new standard promises improvements in all aspects of Wi-Fi, including throughputs, connection quality, and range. Finally, we might have a Wi-Fi connection that can genuinely deliver Multi-Gig or even 10Gbps Internet.

10Gbps Internet: Unlocking the secret of super-broadband

But, again, it will be at least another year, likely longer, before consumer-grade devices are available to purchase. And even then, the device you get might not support all features or speeds the new standard potentially has.

Wi-Fi 7 will materialize gradually, with the real-world performance expected to be worse than the hype, and the use of mix-standard hardware will continue to be a sure thing.

That has been the case with all Wi-Fi revisions. Come to think about it, it’s been years since Wi-Fi 6 became commercially available, yet today we still don’t even have clients faster than dual-stream (2×2). And don’t get me started on Wi-Fi 6E.

As a rule, it’s never a good idea to wait for the latest and greatest. When it comes to getting connected, the availability of the connectivity needed is always more important than the connection method.

The point is that you should buy a Wi-Fi solution that best fits your needs today. Wi-Fi 7, for now, is still an unknown matter of tomorrow. Once it’s here, it’ll stay — we can always upgrade to it in due time.

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Please be mindful that your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily. Β 

  1. Strictly no bigotry, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming -- including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product/brand (β€’).
  2. You're presumed to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments -- questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

(β€’) Per the πŸ’―no-nonsense policy, all comments with an external link are scrutinized, and most links are redacted. Do not leave a comment if you're, in any capacity, representing a company/product mentioned here! Instead, send Dong Knows Tech a private message or use a PR channel.

If you intend to violate any of the rules above, you'll only waste your time.

Thank you!

34 thoughts on “Wi-Fi 7 Explained (vs Wi-Fi 6/E): How It Will Slowly Be a Real Game-Changer”

  1. If 6 GHz is so terrible in terms of range for Wi-Fi 6E, I am not sure how it can be magically better for Wi-Fi 7. Physics is physics.

    • Good point, Kenny. I think Wi-Fi 7 will lump all the bands together and automatically deliver the best performance possible for the distance, environment, and a particular client’s standard. That’s the idea anyway.

  2. Dong, what a good read. At least something to look forward to. I learn so much reading your articles and the comments and questions of others.

    Mahalo Taz

  3. Hello Dong, I have read many of your articles and have transitioned from neophyte to dangerous level knowledge.

    Currently I have 1Gbps service from Xfinity. Using their gateway in bridge mode ( proud that I was recently able to activate it via their app and switch it to bridge mode via their website).
    The router is an Orbi RBR50 with one satelite connected wireless. Only change ever made was SSID, PW and auto firmware updates. Very stable, never drops out. Bought it several years back when they first came out.

    5000 +/- sf home, system covers the whole place including Ring doorbell and floodlight cameras. All TV’s are livestream and zero latency. Not a gamer. Not a heavy user.

    When testing speed with my Samsung S10, download is normally in the 350 Mbps, every now and then it is in the mid 500’s. Upload is normally in high 30’s to low 40’s Mbps.

    Based on my reading of your content, and limited understanding, I am considering the Asus ET12 with wired backhaul. One router with one satellite. Running one Cat 7 wire from office to location where satellite will be. To be done per your post on this subject.

    Aside from Asus marvelous app, parental control and safety improvement; would you consider this a wise upgrade? What improvement speed wise can I expect?

    BTW, congratulations on the way you explain things, allowing a beginner like me to understand and remain engaged. Kudos!


      • Thank you for the fast reply Dong.
        Regarding the modem (I had already read the article previously), the link in the article for the Motorola in Amazon also shows a 2.5Gbps option (your article mentions it is not milti Gig, perhaps a timing thing), get the 2.5 Gbps Motorola or the Arris shown in the article?

          • Correct Dong, the other Motorola that appears on the link to Amazon is the MB8611 which is the 2.5 Gbps. The one on your article is in fact the MB8600 and it is 1Gbps.

            Went by Xfinity and they tell me that my rental fee for the gateway is $25/mth; after further questioning they told me that using my own modem switches the β€œfree” unlimited usage plan to a 1Tb plan, and to upgrade to unlimited it would be $30/mth. A little deceiving!

            Buying the Arris.


          • Ended up going with the Motorola MB8611.
            Xfinity app did not work for some reason, 2 hours later, and three calls; the third rep was able to activate the modem in short order.
            Apparently they allow beginners to man the phones!
            No noticeable speed increase over the Xfinity gateway in bridge mode.
            Now all that is left is to run the cable for the backhaul of the ET12 and replace the Orbi.

          • OK. Been doing all testing with an app on my S10.
            Will load app on wife’s S22.
            Will that work?
            Any particular app you recomend?

          • Right Dong,
            All answers on the article you linked. Thanks!
            However, a little to complicated for me.
            My Surface PC has an USB C, but it is not a thunderbolt.
            I will have to trust that the MB8611 has all the speed needed for when I upgrade the RBR50 to the ET12.

            Thank you very much, most helpful. I am certain I would have NOT attempted these upgrades if it was not for your posts.


  4. Great read.
    I must just add that besides for mobile devices, tablets & pcs there is a lack of clients for wifi 6. Its impossible to find wifi 6 iot devices.

    • Yes, M. I think we’re moving a bit too fast on the broadcasting side, and the receiving end has been playing catchup.

  5. how fast can a capable device UPLOAD on wifi 6E❔ if the conditions are good❔ factors involved ❔

  6. It seems like Wi-Fi 6E is going the way of WiGig where there was a lot of hype around it but few products and adoption. Apple has yet to go beyond 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 and didn’t add Wi-Fi 6E to any 2021 devices. I hope Wi-Fi 7 will be more widely adopted.

    • I kind of have the sensation that some brands are not pushing 6E because 6E is so near (in time) to 7 that it might not be worth it.

      Also 6E is the only standard that will slow down WiFi 7’s performance on the 6 GHz band.

    • Apple is behind in everything, Nathan. It barely supports Wi-Fi 6 now. And when it supports 6E, Tim Cook is gonna act like Apple invented it. πŸ™‚

      You might be right about 6E, but don’t use Apple as the barometer for anything other than Apple itself.

  7. Thanks Dong. I will continue to use my 2 x RT-AX88Us in mesh mode and skip overpriced Wifi 6e generation. My RT-AX88Us will surely last a couple of more years.

  8. Thanks for the article. Great as usual.

    I think it would make sense to skip 6E altogether and upgrade to Wi Fi 7 in 2-3 years.

    I have a smartphone which supports WiFi 6E and have a friend who has a 6E router.The range of the 6 Ghz band is impracticable small and there is very little difference in speeds between 6 Ghz and 5 Ghz bands at least as measured on my Asus Zenfone 8 phone.

    WiFi 6 otoh is a legit very significant upgrade from Wi Fi 5 and investing in a good WiFi 6 router(AX 90) and switching my clients to WiFi 6 almost magically eliminated all interference problems on all bands even super crowded 2.4 Ghz.


Leave a Comment