Thursday, April 30, 2026 โ€ข Welcome to the 100% Nonsense-Free Zone! โ€ข Log in
๐Ÿ›๏ธ Shop AMAZON! ๐Ÿ›’ Shop BEST BUY!

Extending Coverage the Easy Way: A Guide to Picking the Best Wi-Fi Extenders

Share what you're reading!

In case it’s not clear, I’m not a fan of Wi-Fi extendersโ€”often incorrectly referred to as “Wi-Fi boosters”. The best way to scale up Wi-Fi coverage is with a Wi-Fi system, such as a mesh network or preferably one with wired backhaul.

But extenders are always the easiest way to do the job and sometimes even the only wayโ€”not all of us have the luxury or skill to drill holes to run network cables. So, the idea of using a Wi-Fi extender is to make the best out of an unideal situation.

And that’s the point of this post. You’ll find here the concept of extending Wi-Fi wirelessly, how to pick the best extender for your home, when they can actually be an excellent choice, and when you want to avoid them.

Dong’s note: I first published this piece on Feb 1, 2023, and last updated it on April 22, 2026, with the latest information.

ASUS RP AX58 Extender working as a wireless mesh satellite
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: An ASUS Wi-Fi repeater in action. It’s best to use an ASUS extender with an ASUS Wi-Fi router as the two can form an AiMesh system.

Wi-Fi extenders: The perceived convenience at the expense of many shortcomings

As the name suggests, a Wi-Fi extenderโ€”or range extenderโ€”extends the Wi-Fi range of an existing broadcaster (a router or an access point).

Specifically, an extender connects itself to a Wi-Fi networkโ€”just like any Wi-Fi deviceโ€”and then broadcasts its own Wi-Fi network to relay the connection of the original one. For this reason, extenders are often correctly referred to as Wi-Fi repeaters.

Some extenders have network ports to host wired clients. In this case, it also works as a media bridge, which is a Wi-Fi-to-Ethernet adapter.

In any case, extenders are convenient by design, providing a quick way to scale up the Wi-Fi coverage of an existing home network when running network cables or getting a mesh unit isn’t possible.

Specifically, place an extender at a reasonable distance from the original access point (or Wi-Fi router), configure it accordingly, and you have Wi-Fi coverage at that far corner.

And that convenience is generally the only upside of using an extenderโ€”you can use any extender with any existing Wi-Fi network. With that, let’s move on to a long list of this approach’s shortcomings.

Slow speeds due to signal loss

Because it must handle both receiving and transmitting, a Wi-Fi extender generally uses half of its wireless bandwidth for the uplink (backhaul) and the other half for the downlink (clients).

As a result, even in the best-case scenario, clients have only half the bandwidth they had when connecting to the original access point. I often call this phenomenal signal loss.

Backhaul vs. fronthaul

When you use multiple Wi-Fi access pointsโ€”in aย mesh Wi-Fi systemย or a combination of aย Wi-Fi router and an extenderโ€”there are two types of connections: fronthaul and backhaul.

Fronthaul (or downlink) is the Wi-Fi signals broadcast outward to clientsย orย to local area network (LAN) ports for wired devices. It’s what we generally expect from a Wi-Fi broadcaster.

Backhaul (a.k.a. backbone) or uplink, on the other hand, is the link between a Wi-Fi satellite unit and the network’s primary router, or between satellite units.

This link works behind the scenes to keep the hardware units together as a system. It also determines the ceiling bandwidth (and speed) of all devices connected to the particular Wi-Fi satellite unit.

At the satellite/extender unit, keep the following in mind about the connection used for the backhaul uplink, which is a Wi-Fi link (wireless) or a network port (wired):

  • Hardware of Wi-Fi 6e, Wi-Fi 6, or Wi-Fi 5 standards always uses one of its bands (2.4GHz, 5GHz, or 6GHz) for the uplink. In this case:
    • When a Wi-Fi band handles backhaul and fronthaul simultaneously, only half its bandwidth is available to either end.
    • When a Wi-Fi band is used solely for backhauling, often available in tri-band hardware, the link is called a dedicated backhaul.
  • Most Wi-Fi 7 satellite units can use multiple bands for the backhaul link thanks to the MLO feature.

For the best performance and reliability, network cables are recommended for the uplinkย orย wired backhauling, an advantage of mesh Wi-Fi hardware with network ports. In this case, a Wi-Fi satellite unit can use its entire Wi-Fi bandwidth for the fronthaul.

On top of that, extenders tend to increase connection latency, making them unsuitable for real-time communication, such as video conferencing or online gaming.

It’s important to note that an extender’s actual Wi-Fi speed has little to do with how strong its signal is for the Wi-Fi client connected to it. Your device might show full Wi-Fi bars when connected to one, yet still get slow Internet or not even get online.

That’s because all devices connected to the extender share its backhaul uplink. If this link has low bandwdith, such as when the 2.4GHz band is usedโ€”often the case when the extender is far from the original access point or separated by a thick wallโ€”the actual connection (to the Internet) of its clients will be slowed to a crawl, no matter how fast your broadband speed or your original router is.

In all cases, a connected client’s real-world speed is determined by the extender’s backhaul or fronthaul link, whichever is slower. If either end is really slow, your device will suffer, and there’s no situation nowadays in which either can be considered “fast”. That’s the nature of this type of device.

Possible interference with the existing network, hard to manage

To be clear, the type of signal loss mentioned above is also present in a mesh Wi-Fi systemโ€”one in which the hardware units connect to one another wirelessly.

However, in a Wi-Fi mesh system, all mesh units (mesh points) are managed by a central controller, which allows them to work together effectively to deliver seamless handoff and minimize interference. An extender connected to a third-party Wi-Fi network operates independently and can cause unnecessary interference with the network it extends, adversely affecting the speeds of both.

On top of that, even when you program the extender’s SSID (network name) to share the same name and password as that of the original router, you still have two independent Wi-Fi networks in the same airspace. And that means:

  • You can’t manage them in one placeโ€”if you change the SSID or password on the router, you’ll have to re-set up the extender, or it’ll be disconnected.
  • There’s generally no seamless handoff when you move around the house. Clients tend to cling to either until you manually disconnect and reconnect them, or until there’s no signal.

The point is that managing a home network that includes one or a few extenders can be a real pain.

The issue with virtual MAC addresses

When using Wi-Fi extenders, keep in mind that most of them use virtual MAC addresses for connected clients. Specifically, devices connected to an extender will register to the network using a random MAC address instead of their own.

If a device first connects to the primary router using its true MAC address and later connects to the network via an extender using the same MAC address before its original IP lease expires, the system might interpret this as multiple devices sharing the same MAC address, and the device might not be able to connect.

Consequently, any features that rely on MAC to identify a device, such as MAC filtering, IP reservation, Parental Controls, and so on, will not work well, if they work at all.

Many IoT (Internet of Things) devices, “smart devices” in general, also need to connect using their real MAC addresses to work. At the very least, the MAC address change will cause the device to get a new IP address each time it connects to the network, and that alone can be problematic, as detailed here.

Depending on the situation and hardware, there might be ways to overcome this virtual MAC issue, but the process is quite involved.


Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: The real-world tips

Not all extenders are created equal, nor do they work the same with all existing networks. In fact, if you use the right extender, it can pretty well, even very well.

And that brings us to when to even consider an extender

When to consider an extender

Extenders don’t make sense when you can or need to avoid them. Specifically:

  • If your home is wired with network cables, go with access points instead. (Wi-Fi access points are similar to extenders except they use a network cable for the backhauling.)
  • If you need the fastest possible Wi-Fi performance, or if you have Gigabit-class or faster, and want to get the most out of it, you need to consider running network cables around the house.
  • If you need to use more than one extender to cover the entire home, consider a mesh Wi-Fi system instead.

Tips: Extenders vs. mesh point

A mesh Wi-Fi system consists of multiple Wi-Fi broadcasters that work together and can be managed from a single location, such as the router unit or a controller. That’s not automatically the case when you use a few standalone Wi-Fi extenders or access points. You have to use the hardware designed to work together.

That said, in a system with wireless backhauling, each satellite unit is essentially a centrally managed Wi-Fi extender. Similarly, in a mesh with wired backhauling, each satellite unit is essentially a centrally managed access point.

The most significant difference between a Wi-Fi system vs. using multiple individually managed Wi-Fi units is that the former gives you better ease of use, low (or no) interference between broadcasters, and seamless handoff, while the latter doesn’t.

On the other hand, getting an extender makes sense when:

  • If you only need to extend the coverage just a bit more to fully blanket a specific area.
  • If you are OK with modest connection speeds, something that is sustained at around 200Mbps or lower.
  • If you have no better option.

The most important thing to keep in mind is that not all extenders are created equal in every situation.

Picking the right Wi-Fi extender

A couple of things to note in choosing the right extender.

  • Network port: If an extender has a network port, it can likely also work as an access point. It’s a great option in case you get your home wired later on. IF not, the ability to connect a wired device never hurts, either.
  • Wi-Fi standard: It’s best to pick an extender of the same Wi-Fi standard (and tier) as the existing access point/router. If that’s not possible, pick one that’s one generation behind. So if you have a Wi-Fi 6 router, get a Wi-Fi 6 extender or Wi-Fi 5 extender. Having the latest Wi-Fi 7? Avoid using Wi-Fi 5 and older extenders.
  • Possible mesh mode: All extenders work as generic devices by default and will fit into any Wi-Fi network. However, some extenders, when coupled with supported routers from the same vendor, can become a managed mesh satellite unit. Specifically:

That said, it’s best to get an extender from the same hardware vendor as your existing router.

TP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 Range Extender in action
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: A TP-Link extender in action. This type works best with a network hosted by a TP-Link Archer router, as most of them feature EasyMesh.

The takeaway

Wi-Fi extenders are somewhat of a last resort in scaling up your wireless coverage. Generally, the results range from good (best-case scenario) to really bad. Your mileage will vary, but it’s safe to say you’ll never get a great Wi-Fi network with extenders.

Generally, it’s best to run a few network cables to ensure a robust Wi-Fi system. If you can’t do that, consider a serious Wi-Fi 7 mesh system instead.

Share what you just read!
About Dong Ngo

Dong Ngo is an independent tech journalist with over 25 years of experience, including an 18-year stint at CNET, where he ran CNET SF Labs and reviewed gadgets. He founded Dong Knows Tech in early 2018 to provide no-nonsense tech news, reviews, and how-tos.

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal. You're in the no-nonsense zone and that applies BOTH ways.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily. ย 

  1. Strictly no bigotry, falsehood, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming, including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product, a brand, a piece of content, a webpage, or a person (โ€ข).
  2. You're presumed and expected to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments - questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

Thank you!

(โ€ข) If you have subscription-related issues or represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.

10 thoughts on “Extending Coverage the Easy Way: A Guide to Picking the Best Wi-Fi Extenders”

In a hurry? Take a jump!
  1. Another amazing article! Thank you Dong!

    I have a RT-AX88U & RT-AX86S, wired backhaul, all working well. Need better wifi in a detached garage 200 ft away which unfortunately needs to be wireless backhaul. Originally planned on repurposing a RT-AC3200 as a repeater, and after reading this article and a few of your AIMesh ones, I realize this is not a good option based on the AX/AC mix, and I should buy another AIMesh device.

    I looked into the RP-AX58 after reading this article, but now I see that the RT-AX57 is similar priced. Am I correct in assuming the router would be superior? I’ll be using it only as a repeater and maybe as a media bridge for a PC.

    Lastly, does adding this 2×2 device hinder my system at all vs. going to 4×4? I see they are double the cost.

    Thanks much, and I really appreciate all the knowledge.

    Chad

    Reply
    • 200 feet is a tall order, Chad. Likely nothing will work other than wiring. But, if somehow the current signals manage to reach there, you can use either of the APs but you should use it in the repeater mode (instead of AiMesh). That way, it’ll won’t affect the other hadware much. Good luck!

      Reply
      • Thank you! I will give it a try!

        If I purchase an AX model, and decide to run Ethernet out there this coming spring, do I still use repeater mode, or would AIMesh work better at that point?

        Thanks again!

        Reply
  2. Thanks for amazing resource.
    I got cheap (ยฃ20 in UK) tp-link ac750 extender to work with my EE WiFi 6 router.
    Without extender I could not connect my Amazon Fire max 11 tablet to my router reliably. I was getting signal strength of -65 to -70 dBm and SN of less than 20 with constant connection dropouts etc.
    There were 3 walls on the way and running the cable would be at least day work.
    With extender I am getting about -40 dBm signal strength and SN of at least 35 and very often 40 plus.
    So for little money it was perfect solution.
    In UK WiFi 6 extenders (to match my router) don’t make much sense.
    They are more expensive than basic WiFi 6 router.
    So why fully agreeing with your take on WiFi extenders as far from best solution, they are incredible value for non technical people.
    Just press WPS button and type router password.

    Reply
  3. Hi Dong, great article. One thing that was not mentioned is latency.

    My internet connection is 100mb/s downstream & 10mb/s upstream and in one room, where my gaming PC is, my wireless connection is ok for everything except gaming.

    The latency is not good and I often get ping spikes which cause lag. Do you think a wifi extender could reduce latency? If I were to buy an extender that has an ethernet port, would that improve latency?

    Reply
  4. I have had problems connecting WiFi IP cameras and doorbells when using an extender. Is this because an extender uses its own IP address and my cell phone is connected to my main router but the cameras connect themselves to the stronger extender’s IP?

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Light
Dark
๐ŸŽฏ