Saturday, May 18, 2024 • Welcome to the 💯 Nonsense-Free Zone!
🛍️ Today’s 🔥 Deals on An image of Amazon logo🛒

Extending Coverage the Easy Way: A Guide to Picking the Best Wi-Fi Extenders

Share what you're reading!

In case it's not clear, I'm not a fan of Wi-Fi extenders—often incorrectly referred to as "Wi-Fi boosters" which don't exist. The best way to scale up Wi-Fi coverage is via a mesh system, preferably one with wired backhauling.

But extenders are always the easiest way for the job and sometimes even the only way—not all of us have the luxury or skill of drilling holes to run network cables.

If you gotta do it, why not do it at its best? That's true even when you have the worst option and that's the point of this post.

You'll find here the concept of wirelessly extending Wi-Fi, how to pick the best extender for your home, and when to avoid them completely.

TP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 Range Extender in action
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: A TP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 extender in action.

Wi-Fi extenders and their pros and (mostly) cons

As the name suggests, a Wi-Fi extender—or range extender—extends the Wi-Fi range of an existing broadcaster (a router or an access point.)

Specifically, an extender connects itself to a Wi-Fi network—just like any Wi-Fi device—and then broadcasts its own Wi-Fi network to relay the connection of the original one. For this reason, extenders are often correctly referred to as Wi-Fi repeaters.

Some extenders have network ports to host wired clients. In this case, it also works as a media bridge or a Wi-Fi-to-Ethernet adapter.

In any case, extenders are convenient by design, as a method to quickly scale up the Wi-Fi coverage of any existing Wi-Fi network in a home where it's not possible to run network cables.

Place an extender at a good distance from the original broadcaster, program it accordingly and now you have Wi-Fi signals everywhere.

And convenience is generally the only upside of using an extender. Following a couple of major shortcomings with this type of Wi-Fi approach.

Slow speeds

Having to do both receiving and delivering a Wi-Fi extender can't deliver the same speed as the original broadcaster.

Specifically, its Wi-Fi band has only 50% of capacity for either end: the backhaul to the original broadcaster and the fronthaul for clients.

Backhaul vs. fronthaul

When you use multiple Wi-Fi broadcasters—in a mesh network or a combo of a router and an extender—there are two types of connections: fronthaul and backhaul.

Fronthaul is the Wi-Fi signals broadcast outward for clients or the local area network (LAN) ports for wired devices. It's what we generally expect from a Wi-Fi broadcaster.

Backhaul (a.k.a backbone,) on the other hand, is the link between one satellite Wi-Fi broadcaster and another, which can be the network's primary router, a switch, or another satellite unit.

This link works behind the scenes to keep the hardware units together as a system. It also determines the ceiling bandwidth (and speed) of all devices connected to the particular broadcaster. It's the backbone of the system.

At the satellite/extender unit, the connection used for the backhaul—a Wi-Fi link or a network port—is often called the uplink. Generally, a Wi-Fi broadcaster might use one of its bands (2.4GHz, 5GHz, or 6GHz) or a network port for the uplink.

When a Wi-Fi band handles backhaul and fronthaul simultaneously, only half its bandwidth is available to either end. From the perspective of a connected client, that phenomenon is called signal loss.

A Wi-Fi connection between two direct parties occurs in a single band, using one fixed channel, at any given time. This principle applies to all existing Wi-Fi standards, up to Wi-Fi 6E.

When a Wi-Fi band functions solely for backhauling, it's called the dedicated backhaul. Often, that means no other band will do this job, though that depends on the hardware.

In a mesh system, only traditional Tri-band hardware—those with an additional 5GHz band—can have a dedicated backhaul band without ostracizing clients of the same band.

Generally, it's best to use network cables for backhauling—wired backhauling, which is an advantage of mesh hardware with network ports. In this case, a satellite broadcaster can use its entire Wi-Fi bandwidth for front-hauling.

In networking, network cables are always much better than wireless in speed and reliability.

Consequently, clients connected to the extender will get at best half the speed compared to when connected to the original router. On top of that, extenders tend to increase the latency of a connection, which is terrible for gaming or real-time communication.

Some Wi-Fi 5 extenders, such as the Netgear Tri-band EX8000, have an additional band that works solely for the backhaul link. However, starting with Wi-Fi 6, extenders generally don't have this dedicated backhaul band anymore.

As a result, signal loss is generally inevitable when using an extender, and with that, the slow real-world sustained Wi-Fi rates.

It's important to note that an extender's actual Wi-Fi speed has little to do with how strong its signals are. Your device might have full Wi-Fi bars when connected to one yet still gets slow Internet or does not even get online—the extender's backhaul link plays a big role.

Most extenders use the 5GHz band for the backhaul but many also use the 2.4GHz or both bands for this end. In all cases, a connected client's network speed is determined by the extender's backhaul or fronthaul link, whichever is slower. If the backhaul link is broken or slow, your device will suffer.

Netgear Tri band Extenders
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: In the world of Wi-Fi 5, these traditional Tri-band extenders from Netgear—the EX7500 (left) and EX8000—generally work better than their Dual-band counterparts. Starting with Wi-Fi 6, Dual-band extenders are the norm—vendors count on the extra bandwidth to compensate for the signal loss. In any case, extenders are only suitable for low-bandwidth environments.

Possible interference with existing network, hard to manage

Since an extender has an independent Wi-Fi network of its own, its Wi-Fi signals don't play well with the existing environment and might interfere with those of the original network it extends, adversely affecting the speeds of both.

On top of that, even when you program the extender's SSID (or network name) to share the same name and password as that of the original router, you still have two independent Wi-Fi networks in the same air space. And that means:

  • You can't manage them in one place—if you change the SSID or password on the router, you'll have re-set up the extender or it'll be disconnected.
  • There's generally no seamless handoff when you move around the house. Clients tend to cling to their current broadcaster until you disconnect and reconnect them manually.

So managing a home network that includes an extender can be a pain.

The issue with virtual MAC addresses

When using Wi-Fi extenders, keep in mind that most of them use virtual MAC addresses for connected clients.

Specifically, devices connected to an extender will register to the network using a random MAC address instead of their own.

If a device first connects to the primary router using its true MAC address and then later connects to the network via an extender using the same MAC before its original IP lease expires, the system might interpret the situation as multiple devices sharing the same MAC—the device might not get connected at all.

Consequently, any features that rely on MAC to identify a device, such as MAC filtering, IP reservation, Parental Controls, and so on, will not work well, if at all.

Specific IoT (Internet of Things) devices also need to connect using their real MAC to work. At the very least, the MAC address change will cause the device to get a new IP address each time it connects to the network, and that alone can be problematic, as described here.

Depending on the situation and hardware, there might be ways to overcome this virtual MAC issue, but the process is quite involved.

Wi-Fi extenders: The recap

Extenders tend to be terrible at real-world speeds due to signal loss and overhead. Most of them are also of low Wi-Fi tiers, further lowering their real-world performance.

Still, they are popular Wi-Fi "quick fixes" due to the fact they can conveniently give users the full Wi-Fi bars at a location where you used to get low or no bars at all. In a way, they are an illusion of "better Wi-Fi."

These bars are also the base for lots of false advertisements on this type of device, claiming they are fast and "plug-and-play". I've seen many folks literally plug an extender in a power socket, and that's it, thinking it'll somehow magically make things better.

The reality is this: Most of the time, extenders are much worse than general expectations. But they work and can work pretty well, even very well, if you know how to pick the correct one.

And that brings us to the next part.

Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: The real-world tips

To get the best of anything it's always about applicability. So let's see when an extender makes sense and when it doesn't.

When getting an extender makes sense and when it doesn’t

Extenders don't make sense in situations where you can avoid them or need the best performance. Specifically, if:

  • your home is wired with network cables, avoid extenders and go with access points instead. (Wi-Fi access points are similar to extenders except they use a network cable for the backhauling.)
  • you need the fastest-possible Wi-Fi performance, or if you have Gigabit-class or faster, then you need to think of running network cables around the house.
  • you need to use more than one extender to cover the entire home. That's time to get a mesh system instead.

Extra: Extenders vs. wireless mesh satellites

A mesh system consists of multiple Wi-Fi broadcasters (access points or extenders) that work together and can be managed in one place, such as a mobile app or the primary router unit's web user interface.

In a mesh with wireless backhauling, each satellite unit is essentially a centrally managed Wi-Fi extender. In a mesh with wired backhauling, each satellite unit is essentially a centrally managed access point.

The most significant difference between a mesh system and using multiple individually managed broadcasters is that the former gives you better ease of use, low (or no) interference between broadcasters, and seamless handoff, while the latter doesn't.

On the other hand, getting an extender makes sense when:

  • you only need to extend the coverage just a bit more to fully blanket the area.
  • you are OK with modest connection speeds—something that is sustained at around 200Mbps or lower.
  • you have no better option.

The most important thing to note is that not all extenders are created equal. That brings us to what to note on picking the actual hardware.

Picking the right Wi-Fi extender

A couple of things to note in choosing the right extender.

  • Network port: If an extender has a network port, chances are it can also work as an access point. It's a great option in case you get your home wired later on. The ability to host a wired device never hurts, either.
  • Wi-Fi standard: It's best to pick an extender of the same Wi-Fi standard (and tier) as the existing router. So if you have a Wi-Fi router, get a Wi-Fi 5 extender. Rocking a Wi-Fi 6 network? Pick a Wi-Fi 6 extender.
  • Mesh mode: All extenders work as a generic device by default and will fit in any Wi-Fi network. However, some extenders, when coupled with supported routers from the same vendor can become a managed mesh satellite unit.

That said, it's best to get an extender from the same hardware vendor as your existing router.

For example, the Asus RP-AX56 is a standard extender, but when coupled with an AiMesh router, it becomes a full-feature satellite node of a robust mesh system.

The same thing can be said about TP-Link's OneMesh-ready extenders, such as the RE700X AX3000 or RE715X. So if you have a TP-Link OneMesh router, these are a perfect match to form a mesh system.

But the point is this: If you can avoid it, don't pick a generic no-name extender. The performance and reliability will suffer. Instead, when possible, pick one that's designed to work well with the particular router you have.

In the best-case scenario—and you won't need to look very hard—you'll end up with a real wireless mesh system, which is much better than the combo of a standard router and a standard extender.

If you're in a hurry, below are my three top choices.

Best three Wi-Fi 6 extenders to bring home today

These Wi-Fi 6 extenders will work with any network, but they all can form a mesh if you use them with the correct router.

If you use a gateway provided by your Internet service provider, it might have extenders of its own. For example, Comcast's Xfinity gateways work with xFi Pods to create a mesh.

But in this case, it's best to replace it with a terminal device and use your own mesh system on top.

1. Asus RP-AX56: An excellent extender for an AiMes router

Asus RP AX56 AX1800 Dual Band Wi-Fi 6 Repeaters quite compactAsus RP AX56 AX1800 Dual Band Wi-Fi 6 Repeater Network Port
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: The Asus RP- AX56 comes with a Gigabit network port, allowing it to host a wired device (in extender mode) or work as an access point (or wired mesh satellite.)

The RP-AX56 works fine as a generic extender or access point. However, it's part of Asus's AiMesh ecosystem and therefore can be an excellent mesh satellite unit for those with an AiMesh router.

Alternatively, you can pick any other AiMesh-ready extender—pick one of the same Wi-Fi standards as your current Asus router.

Asus RP-AX56/58 Repeaters' Rating

8.4 out of 10
Asus RP AX5x Extender
8.5 out of 10
8.5 out of 10
Ease of Use
8 out of 10
8.5 out of 10



Reliable and relatively fast Wi-Fi (for the specs) with good coverage

Can work as an Access Point, a Media Bridge, an Extender, or an AiMesh node (via wireless or wired backhaul)

Convenient design, excellent web interface


Modest 2x2 specs; only one Gigabit port; no Mulit-Gig support

Bulky for a snap-on device

2. TP-Link RE715X: Excellent for those with a OneMes-ready router

TP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 Range Extender portTP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 Range Extender in action
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: A bit bulky but the TP-Link RE715X works very well for its Wi-Fi grade, especially when coupled with a TP-Link Archer router.

The RE715X is one of the latest and "highest-end" Wi-Fi 6 extenders TP-Link makes for its OneMesh ecosystem. It's an excellent choice if you have one of these Archer routers and need to extend the Wi-Fi just a bit more to that far corner of the house.

Alternatively, you can pick any OneMesh-ready extender, of the same Wi-Fi standard as your router, to get a similar experience.

TP-Link RE715's Rating

7.6 out of 10
TP-Link RE715X Wi-Fi 6 Range Extender mounted
7.5 out of 10
7 out of 10
Ease of Use
8 out of 10
8 out of 10


Versatile and easy to use; can work as an extender, an access point, or a OneMesh satellite

160MHz support, reliable performance with decent data rates and coverage

Convenient design, full web interface


No wired backhauling as a OneMesh satellite

Super-bulky, no pass-through socket

Slow performance as a standard extender with virtual MAC address issue.

3. Netgear EAX80: An excellent Wi-Fi 6 access point

NETGEAR EAX80 Nighthawk Wi-Fi 6 Mesh Extender
Picking the best Wi-Fi extenders: The Netgear EAX80 is an excellent companion for a Nighthawk router.

I haven't tested the Netgear EAX80 for an in-depth review but have used a few units for personal and business purposes, and they proved to be reliable and fast—for an extender, that is.

Most importantly, the EAX80 has four Gigabit ports and can work as an access point, making it also an excellent buy for a wired home.

Sharing the same Netgear Nighthawk app, the EAX80 works best with a Netgear Nighthawk router but it can work as a standard extender for any existing network.

Netgear EAX80 Extender's Quick Rating

8 out of 10
NETGEAR EAX80 Nighthawk WiFi 6 Mesh Range Extender
8 out of 10
8 out of 10
Design and Setup
9 out of 10
7 out of 10


Top Wi-Fi 6 tier with fast performance

Four Gigabit ports; can work as an access point

Easy to set up, helpful mobile app


Expensive, bulky design

The final thoughts

Wi-Fi extenders are somewhat of the last resort in scaling up your wireless coverage. Generally, the results range from good (best case scenario) to really bad. Your mileage will vary somewhere in between.

But it's safe to say you'll never get a great Wi-Fi network with extenders. Even in the best-case scenario—like when you pick one of the above and use it with a supported router—you'll only get a wireless mesh system.

And wireless mesh system is never as good as using a standard access point, which by default works via wired backhauling. And for that check out this post on how to pick the best access points for your network.

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily.  

  1. Strictly no bigotry, falsehood, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming, including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product, a brand, a piece of content, a webpage, or a person (•).
  2. You're presumed and expected to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments - questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

Thank you!

(•) If you have subscription-related issues or represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.

6 thoughts on “Extending Coverage the Easy Way: A Guide to Picking the Best Wi-Fi Extenders”

  1. Thanks for amazing resource.
    I got cheap (£20 in UK) tp-link ac750 extender to work with my EE WiFi 6 router.
    Without extender I could not connect my Amazon Fire max 11 tablet to my router reliably. I was getting signal strength of -65 to -70 dBm and SN of less than 20 with constant connection dropouts etc.
    There were 3 walls on the way and running the cable would be at least day work.
    With extender I am getting about -40 dBm signal strength and SN of at least 35 and very often 40 plus.
    So for little money it was perfect solution.
    In UK WiFi 6 extenders (to match my router) don’t make much sense.
    They are more expensive than basic WiFi 6 router.
    So why fully agreeing with your take on WiFi extenders as far from best solution, they are incredible value for non technical people.
    Just press WPS button and type router password.

  2. Hi Dong, great article. One thing that was not mentioned is latency.

    My internet connection is 100mb/s downstream & 10mb/s upstream and in one room, where my gaming PC is, my wireless connection is ok for everything except gaming.

    The latency is not good and I often get ping spikes which cause lag. Do you think a wifi extender could reduce latency? If I were to buy an extender that has an ethernet port, would that improve latency?

  3. I have had problems connecting WiFi IP cameras and doorbells when using an extender. Is this because an extender uses its own IP address and my cell phone is connected to my main router but the cameras connect themselves to the stronger extender’s IP?


Leave a Comment