Saturday, May 18, 2024 • Welcome to the 💯 Nonsense-Free Zone!
🛍️ Today’s 🔥 Deals on An image of Amazon logo🛒

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Review (vs. ZenWifi XD4): A Solid and Improved Mini Mesh

Share what you're reading!

The ZenWiFi XD5 does not complete what the ZenWifi XD4 set out to start—it's similarly stripped-down hardware in terms of features. But it does have everything the older cousin had and then some noteworthy improvements.

I reviewed the ZenWifi XD4 in June 2020 and called it the first "complete AiMesh set," thanks to the fact it features AiMesh 2.0, supporting system-wide Guest networking right out of the box. But its online protection and QoS features were not as robust as other AiMesh hardware of larger physical sizes.

More than two years later, the ZenWiFi XD5, released in late 2022, has improved performance. But it retains the mini designs and the miniaturized feature set.

Here's the bottom line: If you're living in a wired home, the ZenWifi XD5 is still an excellent buy, considering its friendly current price tag of $300 for a 3-pack. Better yet, you can use it as the wired satellite for an AX3000 AiMesh router, such as the RT-AX58U or GS-AX3000, to form a relatively inexpensive yet robust Wi-Fi system.

The ZenWifi XD5 works well in a fully wireless configuration, too, but in this case, you'll need to cut its speed at least in half at the satellites.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 3 pack
The Asus ZenWifi XD5 is available in a 3-pack of three identical routers.

Asus ZenWiFi XD5: Everything the ZenWifi XD4 is and a bit more

Out of the box, the new ZenWiFi XD5 looks practically identical to the older cousin. It's a 3-pack mesh that includes three identical compact routers.

The ZenWifi XD4 originally included a router unit and a satellite-only unit, but since its launch, it has also been available as three identical routers.

You pick one to work as the primary router of the network, and the other two will function as mesh satellite nodes to extend the coverage for a large area.

For now, it's available as a 3-pack, but chances are you'll find it as a single router or a 2-pack in the future.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 AiMesh
Here's the Asus ZenWifi XD5 working as a 3-pack mesh system. You can daisy-chain the satellite wirelessly (not recommended) or via wired backhauling.

If you get a pack, the hardware is pre-synced—all you have to do is set one up as the router and plug the other two into power, and they will form a mesh network.

However, the hardware will work as a member of an AiMesh system when coupled with other support routers. In that case, you can set them up the way you do any AiMesh router, as I detailed in this post.

Asus ZenWiFi XD5 vs. ZenWifi XD4: Hardware specifications

The most significant difference between the ZenWifi XD5 vs. ZenWiFi XD4 is that the former is a dual-band system that supports the 160 MHz channel width, while the latter doesn't.

Consequently, the XD5 has double the Wi-Fi bandwidth on the 5GHz band. Specifically, the current 2x2 Wi-Fi 6 client can connect to it at 2.4Gbps instead of 1.2Gbps.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Router UndersideZenWiFi XD4 Router Underside
ZenWifi XD5 vs. ZenWifi XD4 (right): Note how the former is wall-mount-ready, and the latter is not. Their undersides are the only place you can tell them apart, by the way.

However, considering both are Gigabit hardware, they will deliver the same sustained speed in any particular connection since their network ports are the bottleneck.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Top and BottomAsus ZenWiFi AX Mini XD4 Mesh System 12
Full NameAsus ZenWiFi XD5Asus ZenWiFi
AX Mini (XD4)
Hardware ModelsZenWiFi XD5Mesh: ZenWifi XD4
Router: XD4R
Satellite: XD4N
Mesh Availability3-pack
(identical routers)
(identical routers, or
router + satellites)
Wi-Fi BandwidthDual-band
Dedicated Backhaul BandNoneNone
Wired BackhaulYes
Dimensions (WxDxH)3.54 x 3.54 x 3.14 in
(9.0 x 9.0 x 8.0 cm )
3.54 x 3.54 x 3.14 in
(9.0 x 9.0 x 8.0 cm )
0.67 lb (304 g)
XD4R: 0.65 lb (295 g) 
XD4N: 0.64 lb (290 g)
ColorBlack or whiteBlack, white, wood pattern
5GHz Wi-Fi Specs2x2 AX: Up to 2400 Mbps 
2x2 AX: Up to 1200 Mbps 
2.4GHz Wi-Fi Specs2x2 AX: Up to 574Mbps2x2 AX: Up to 574Mbps
Wi-Fi SecurityWPA3 / WPA2 / WPA WPA3 / WPA2 / WPA 
Backward Compatibility802.11b/a/g/n/ac802.11b/a/g/n/ac
Mobile AppAsus RouterAsus Router
Web User InterfaceYes Yes 
AP ModeYes 
(single unit or a system)
(single unit or a system)
USB PortNoneNone
Gigabit Port1x WAN
1x LAN
XD4R: 1x WAN, 1x LAN
XD4N: 1x LAN
Link AggregationNoNo
Power Input100-240V100-240V
Power Consumption
(per 24 hours)
105 Wh
(measured at the router unit)
Not measured
Processing PowerUndisclosedQuad-core SoC Processor,
256MB Flash, 256MB RAM 
US Price
(at launch)
Hardware specifications: Asus ZenWiFi XD5 vs. ZenWifi XD4

Other than that, the XD5's hardware is wall-mount-ready and includes mounting accessories, while the XD4 is not.

Asus ZenWiFi XD5: Detail photos

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Retail BoxAsus ZenWifi XD5 Box Content
The Asus ZenWifi XD5's retail box and the content. Note the mounting accessories.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Includes three idential routers
Asus ZenWifi XD5 Includes three identical routers. Or you can say this is a picture of a ZenWifi XD4 set. Nobody can tell.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Underside
The underside of an Asus ZenWifi XD5 router. Note how compact the hardware is.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Power Adapter
Each Asus ZenWifi XD5 router comes with a relatively compact 100-240V power adapter.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Underside Plugged InAsus ZenWifi XD5 Ports
A ZenWifi XD5's underside with and without network cables is installed.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Front Light
An Asus ZenWifi XD5 in action
Note its front status light, which flashes or pulses to show the condition of the hardware.

The same (stripped-down) set of features and settings

At the time of this review, the ZenWifi XD5 shares the same major firmware version (386) as the ZenWifi XD4 and an identical feature set.

Tips on Asus's firmware

Considering the vast number of hardware options, most of which can be combined into a mesh system using the AiMesh feature, firmware can be tricky for Asus, especially with hardware running firmware versions that start with the kernel.

When it comes to updating—especially in an AiMesh setup of mixed hardware units using wireless backhauling—keep the following three items in mind:

  1. Avoid the initial major release: This is the first firmware version of a model where the middle three digits of the firmware version change, such as from 384 to 386 or from 386 to 388. Generally, the latest minor update of the previous major firmware release is always the most stable.
  2. Avoid using Auto-Update for firmware: Instead of letting the hardware update itself, you should update the firmware when you see fit.
  3. Version consistency (in a mesh system): Generally, it would be best to use the firmware version of the same major release for all AiMesh members. (Mixing hardware of different major releases can produce mixed results.)

On the one hand, moving between major releases might break your AiMesh setup or even your standalone router. On the other hand, new hardware comes with a specific initial version that is out of the box—you have no option to downgrade it—and some old models won't get the latest release. So, depending on the mesh combo, your luck will vary.

As a rule, when using hardware with the kernel in a mesh system, it's best to wait for a few minor updates of a major release before upgrading. Depending on the hardware combo, you might need to rebuild the system from scratch or reset and re-add a satellite node if you change the major firmware version (in one or all hardware units involved.)

And that's significant in the sense that the two share the same shortcomings, which are not present in other ZenWifi mesh sets (such as XD6, XT8, or ET8). That's likely because they have a similar mini-physical size and relatively low processing power.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 AiProtectionAsus ZenWifi XD5 QoS
The ZenWifi XD5's QoS and AiProtection are equally poor as the case of the XD4.

Specifically, the ZenWifi XD5's QoS feature is also somewhat simplistic. All you can do is turn it on and hope for the best. Additionally, the AiProtection feature's network protection part doesn't have the Two-Way Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) portion

Two-way IPSP is significant since it protects the network from spam, DDoS, and other attacks, even when a computer within a network is compromised.

Note on Asus's privacy policy

By default, all Asus routers don't require users to use a third-party login account or provide personal information to the vendor.

However, turning on specific features that require scanning the hardware's traffic, such as Traffic monitoring, AiProtection, or Parental Control, or binding the hardware with a third-party account would increase the privacy risks.

Privacy and security are a matter of degree, and data collection varies from one company to another. Here's the Taiwanese hardware vendor's Privacy Policy.

But despite that, the ZenWifi XD5 still has vast home networking customization. It has more settings and features than virtually all non-Asus canned mesh systems.

Most importantly, you won't need to pay for any add-on or log in with a vendor account to use and manage it, locally or remotely, via the web user interface or the Asus mobile app.

And if you have used an ASUS router before, you'll feel at home with the new mesh.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 VPNAsus ZenWifi XD5 Guest Network
Though modest compared to other Asus routers, the ZenWifi XD5 still has a far better feature set than any other non-Asus canned mesh system. Shown here are its VPN and Guest networking features.

ZenWiFi XD5: Excellent performance

I put a 3-pack ZenWiFi XD5 through its paces for over a week and was happy with it. The system proved reliable with zero disconnection.

For Internet speed, in a wireless star topology, we generally got between 200Mbps to 600Mbps—out of a 10Gbps Fiber-optic connection that was throttled down to Gigabit by the router's WAN port—around the house. That was fast enough for virtually all applications.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Router Long Range PerformanceAsus ZenWifi XD5 Router Close Range Performance
The ZenWifi XD5's sustained Wi-Fi speed when working as a single router or a wired satellite node.

In terms of Wi-Fi sustained speeds, in my testing, the ZenWifi XD5 landed right between the XD4 and the XD6, which was expected. Considering the Gigabit ports, there's no way the system could deliver anything faster than a Gig, despite its support for up to 2.4Gbps on the Wi-Fi front.

Asus ZenWifi XD5 Satellite Close Range PerformanceAsus ZenWifi XD5 Satellite Long Range Performance
The ZenWifi XD5's sustained Wi-Fi speed when working as a wireless satellite with a direct connection to the primary router.

In terms of coverage, the ZenWifi XD5 was slightly better than the XD4. But that's more likely because its 5GHz band has a high ceiling speed.

It's hard to put this in a number, but generally, you can expect a single unit to cover some 1600 ft² (149 m²) though your mileage will vary. For best performance and coverage, wired backhauling is recommended.

Asus ZenWiFi XD5's Rating

8.3 out of 10
Asus ZenWifi XD5 Box
8.5 out of 10
8.5 out of 10
Design and Setup
8 out of 10
8 out of 10


Supporting 160MHz channel width; reliable performance with fast performance (for the specs)

Excellent set of network and Wi-Fi settings and features

No vendor account or add-on subscription is required; Guest networking works throughout the system

Compact design; wall-mount-ready


No Wi-Fi 6E, Multi-Gig port, Dual-WAN, or Link Aggregation

Stripped-down QoS and AiProtection features

Only two network ports per unit


The ZenWiFi XD5 is a clear improvement over the ZenWifi XD4 that came out some two years ago. It has enough to justify its current $300 cost for a 3-pack.

If you're looking for a reliable mesh system for a sub-Gigabit home network, this new set of mini hardware is an excellent buy.

And if you have a wired home, it'll consistently deliver Gigabit-class bandwidth throughout by itself or when working as AiMesh satellites hosted by a similar-specced router.

As it seems, the ZenWifi XD5 is the base for Asus's upcoming first MoCA-enabled mesh set, the ZenWiFi hybrid XC5.

But if you can live with a slightly slower connection speed, the ZenWifi XD4 is now also an excellent deal thanks to its reduced price tag.

So if you have relatively modest Wi-Fi needs, check either of them out today!

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily.  

  1. Strictly no bigotry, falsehood, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming, including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product, a brand, a piece of content, a webpage, or a person (•).
  2. You're presumed and expected to have read this page in its entirety, including related posts and links in previous comments - questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

Thank you!

(•) If you have subscription-related issues or represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.

42 thoughts on “Asus ZenWifi XD5 Review (vs. ZenWifi XD4): A Solid and Improved Mini Mesh”

  1. Hey, great evaluation. I will be changing from an old apple airport (which is struggling to get into some rooms) to a small mesh system. I only receive 300 mbs in my 3000sq’ home because of spousal approval (size and color) I am considering either the tp X55 or the Zen XD5, IYO which may be the better fit.

  2. I have a Bluecave+2xTrio setup in a three storey row house, with fiber ONT and Bluecave in the basement, and wired backhaul.

    Have been very happy with the stability of the setup, but as the Bluecave in particular is showing increased signs of tiredness (loosing internet, forced to reboot), I’m thinking of installing a new system.

    What would you think of an all-XD5 set vs XD6+2xXD5 vs 2xXD6+XD5? The needs aren’t the biggest when it comes to speed. Stability, ease of use, longevity and discretion (white gear) are Key.

    Thanks for an excellent site!

    • Any of those you mentioned will be better than what you have now, Gustav, but they are all entry-level, just keep that in mind in terms of your expectations for speed. The reviews will give you an idea of what you’ll experience. If you want to save, you can replace the Blue Cave with the RT-AC86U. Good luck!

      • Thanks!
        You do confirm my suspicions.

        I do believe that the specs of all alternatives are more than enough for our current and future needs.

        Have you experienced any differences in stability between xd5 and xd6?

        Regards, Gus

  3. I have an asus ZenWiFi XD5 mesh system set up with wired backhauling. From one of the satellite devices, I’d hoped to be able to use the LAN port to connect a pc to the network for internet access. However the pc doesn’t seem to get a signal – the nic shows as disconnected. Why would this be true, is there a setting I can change to get it to fly? The router software shows that DHCP is turned on, and both devices I’ve tried to run from the satellite by wire use DHCP to get an ip address. The backhaul connection priority on the two satellites is set to 1G WAN first; the other options are 5Ghz WiFI first and Auto (it defaulted to auto).

      • Interesting reply. Certainly the pcs have good nics, I will check the cable. But you’re confirming that the LAN port on these units can operate much like the port on a switch, relaying the incoming signal from the WAN/LAN port. Thank you.

        • Yeap, that’s the case — more here. And I tried that out in every review. If something amiss, I’d note that in the review of the particular hardware. So far, I’ve never run into the issue. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen from one firmware version to another but it’s highly unlikely and definitely unintended.

      • Hey Dong I love your reviews and your input!
        Can I use a single wired to fiber ZenWifi XD5 router in a small 3 rooms house?

          • Hey Dong, I have another question,
            For a house of 3 smart TV’s over WiFi, 1 PC via Ethernet, 2 smart phones and sometimes a tablet or laptop, would this 1 unit of XD5 be enough?
            I just ordered this unit as main router.
            But I can always change to XT9.

          • That depends on how you define “enough”, Shephard, and it also depends on the broadband you have. But for generally connection, it should do. The XT9 is much better however.

          • Then you want a router with at least a Multi-Gig (2.5Gbps or faster) WAN port, Shepard. So the XT9, ET8, RT-AX86U, or one these (check the alternatives, too.)

            But the XD5 will likely do, assuming you only need one broadcaster.

          • Thanks for the reply!
            I saw your reviews for these units you suggested, but for my house I need a white one, to put it on a wall or a shelf.

            I need a single router unit, small house.
            I saw the speed of the XD5 in your reviews that looks great, but yeah maybe I should get the XT9, I will consider it.

  4. Hello Dong,

    I have an Asus RT-AX86U for my router. Can i connect a pair of these to my aimesh network as wireless nodes? I would do ethernet backhauling but unfortunately I cannot so I would like to use these as range extenders.

    Thanks and cheers!

  5. hi dong. can i use a 3 pack of the XD5 as wireless nodes of a mesh system with a ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX11000 as the main router?

  6. Hi Dong,

    I wonder if you can help, as you’ve knowledge of the Asus mesh range.

    What’s the difference between the XD4 Plus, the AX Mini (XD4) and the XD5?

    Many thanks,


  7. Hi Dong.

    I currently use a AX5400 as my primary router (connected to a Fibre ONT for 500Mbps) and wanted to improve wifi coverage across a large, 2 storey home.

    Would the XD5 provide a solution to this, working with the AX5400 as the main router (and connection to the modem)?
    Would the XD5 with more nodes, provide better coverage than something like the XT8/9 with fewer, more powerful nodes?

    Thank you


      • Thanks for the link. I’m still a little confused, though as I can’t use wired backhauling (Powerline networking is my only wired option, but that’s the buttleneck I’m trying to overcome now), it would appear that I’m after tri-band units, such as the XT8/9s. Though with my current setup, the TUF AX5400 would be a new bottleneck, being only dual band!

        Haha, this is more complex than I expected!

        Feels like a bit of a gamble now! at least Amazons return policy is pretty good.

        Thanks again Dong 🙂

  8. Will this work? My home is wired and I use wired as much as possible, including for AP wired backhaul. This works currently with Eero (2020, basic model), but I want to get away from Eero. I can’t use Netgear or TP-Link because they cannot provide a guest network for IoT while in AP mode. Additionally, I need 3 nodes for townhome coverage. Thank you!
    Modem (bridge) OPNsense/Zenarmor 2.5g Switch PC, AppleTV, Mac, Asus XD5 (access point) x3

  9. Doug
    I sent you this by email and you answered and pointed me here for comments.

    I’ve been reading your site now for 5 days, it’s outstanding. My system now is HughesNet and DirecTv, I live in the country. I’m getting ready to dump both and go to InterMax, they have a tower close by. I will be under 100MBps, but that’s better than HughesNet.

    Coverage-I have 2,000 sqft rectangular basement with a 2,000 sqft rectangular main (4,000 sqft) total. House is wired with CAT6, 3 TV’s downstairs, 3 TV’s upstairs with two wired offices (total 8). Mechanical room downstair (modem & router), with 5 additional devices wired (audio/video). Modem to router to 16 port switch (no PoE). I will be 90% wired use and 10% WiFi use (tablet/laptop, and guest). Based on your articles, I’m a prime candidate for dual-band WiFi6 mesh system. I plan a mesh router in mechanical room, and 1-2 nodes in offices. They are located at each end of the main floor. I will hardwire the nodes and then wire the desktops from the node, thus backhaul is accomplished wired.

    Speed-is not an issue, not with less than 100 MBps.

    Features-TBD since I’m not a Tech person.

    Unit-Based on your 5 recommendations for a wired house and minor WiFi, ASUS ZenWiFi XD6. This is only a 2-pack system. No Multi-Gig or Link aggregation, I do not think I need either. No USB port, nice to have. How do I determine 2 or 3 pack is required for WiFi?

    Based on my input, am I reading you correctly?

    You answered: For your case, almost any combo would work. But I’d recommend the XD5. You can also pair and nice router with a couple of cheaper satellites. Make sure you follow this post for setting things up.

    From above you said: Better yet, you can use it as the wired satellite for an AX3000 AiMesh router, such as the RT-AX58U or GS-AX3000, to form a relatively inexpensive yet robust Wi-Fi system.

    I understand about your recommendation to me about using the ADX5 ‘s over the ADX6, my question is the alternative?

    Alternative: GS-AX3000 as my router (better than the ADX5 as a router), what would be my 2-nodes/satellite for the office space? What matches my parameters?

    Again, thank you for your feedback on my email! I have sent your site to three of my friend working on a new WIFI system.

      • Doug
        Per your feedback: Deductive Reasoning, me?
        Read your two post and others

        DX5 AiMesh System
        Simple setup with 2 nodes with 2 Lan ports for wired backhaul and wired desktops
        Cost: $220

        Comb: Better Router
        ROG STRIX GS-AX3000-router
        DX5 nodes
        Need 2-Lan ports for wired backhaul and wire desktops
        Extra node place in basement end room as wireless
        Cost $170 + $220 = $390

        Any recommendation for primary router vice the GS-AX3000 you recommended? From the router then pick the nodes.


          • Dong
            Two question:

            Projected comb mesh system; GS-AX3000 and XD5. One node will be in my office, wire it only has 1-LAN remaining out. I can buy a switch to feed printer (network), laptop and desktop. Or, buy another AX-3000 with 4-LAN ports. Economics not an issue, reliablity is !

            I’m dropping HughsNet and getting InterMax (Idaho). They said I do not need a modem, they use radio signal and CAT6 wire to router. Is the signal digital and not analog that needs converting by a modem?

            Thanks again for you assistance!


          • First, it’s helpful to understand things in princple, Michael.

            1. If you have a LAN port that’s part of a network then you can use a switch with it, that’s how a switch is — it turns a single port into multiple ports. As for AiMesh, this post details how to set one up.
            2. Generally a modem is only needed to convert a service signal (TV, phone, etc) into network signals. That’s what a modem is. A network device attach a device of any fucntion to a network. For example, a printer prints but if it’s a network printer then you can connect it to a network (instead of a single computer via an USB cable). We don’t use a modem to convert data signal into papers.

            Then with a bit of deductive reasoning, you can answer your questions yourself.

  10. Hi Dong. Thanks for all the info! I purchased an XD5 pack and planned to use two satellites with wired backhaul to the primary node. I overlooked the fact there are not enough LAN ports to support both satellites. In a sub-gig home, is attaching a network switch to the primary sufficient, or should I opt for a more sophisticated AiMesh host?

  11. Kinda wondering if 160mhz and improved range, however marginal, is worth the upgrade from xd4 to xd5…
    Oh and I think there’s a mistake in the hardware specifications table, because 160mhz is missing from xd5 in there.


Leave a Comment