🔥
In this post, you’ll find the answers to picking the best AiMesh router combination that fits a particular situation.
When through, chances are you’ll be able to build yourself a flexible, feature-laden, privacy-friendly Wi-Fi solution that’s also well-performing and reliable.
Unlike popular canned mesh systems — like the eero, Netgear Orbi, TP-Link Deco, or Linksys Velop — AiMesh can be a bit hard to set up and use.
It can also be buggy, especially when you pick the wrong combo, which is why I wrote this piece — make sure you read the top part where I’ll explain the best way to pair AiMesh hardware.
But AiMesh also has the most to offer among all home mesh options. You’re opting for a somewhat adventurous, albeit exciting, Wi-Fi approach here. It’s worth it!
This post is part of my series on Asus’s AiMesh. Check out the related post below if you have questions on the topic.
Dong’s note: I first published this piece on February 28, 2021, and last updated it on February 11, 2022, to add more relevant information.
Table of Contents
How to pick the best AiMesh Router Combos: The rules of thumb
Below is the list of existing Asus routers that can work as part of an AiMesh Wi-Fi system. It’s not complete and only includes broadcasters available in the U.S. market.
AiMesh hardware
The way it works, you use one router as the primary node, and the rest will work as a satellite node(s) to scale up the coverage. The primary router decides the features of your mesh.
Extra: Current AiMesh broadcasters
Note: This extra content was originally published in the AiMesh overview post.
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) AiMesh broadcasters
Most of these are legacy broadcasters that might not support the latest version of AiMesh.
- Tri-band: GT-AC5300, RT-AC5300, Lyra, and ZenWiFi AC.
- Dual-band: RP-AC1900, RT-AC1900, RT-AC1900P/U, RT-AC2900, RT-AC3100, RT-AC5300, RT-AC68P/R/RW/U/UF/W, GT-AC2600, Lyra Trio, Blue Cave, RT-AC86U, RT-AC88U, and possibly more.
Wi-Fi 6/6E (802.11ax) AiMesh broadcasters
These non-complete lists only include the latest broadcasters already covered on this website.
- Tri-band (Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E):
- Traditional Tri-band (5GHz + 5GHz + 2.4GHz): GT-AX11000, RT-AX92U, ZenWiFi AX, ZenWiFi Pro XT12, and more.
- Wi-Fi 6E Tri-band (6GHz + 5GHz +2.4Ghz): GT-AXE1100, ZenWiFi ET8, ZenWiFi Pro ET12, GT-AXE16000, and more.
- Dual-band (Wi-Fi 6): RT-AX88U, RT-AX89X, RT-AX3000 / RT-AX58U, RT-AX56U, ZenWiFi XD4, RT-AX86U, RT-AX82U, RT-AX68U, RP-AX56, GS-AX3000, GS-AX5400, ZenWiFi XD6, GT-AX6000, ZenWiFi AX Hybrid XP4, and more.
Technically, you can arbitrarily use a combo of any broadcasters above to create a mesh system, and it will work. It’s a matter of degrees. The point is don’t do that. Instead, follow these tips to make sure you get the best out of your hardware.
For the most part, though, picking AiMesh hardware is similar to that of any mesh system.
Wired backhaul is generally recommended, especially for Dual-band (or Wi-Fi 6E Tri-band) hardware
Like all home mesh systems, you should use the wired backhaul. That is when you use a network cable to connect the main router and a satellite unit.
In this case, you can use CAT5e (or higher-grade) network cables — Gigabit or faster wiring is a must. You can daisy-chain the hardware units or place (unmanaged) switch(es) in between them.
By the way, I talked about Multi-Gig wired backhaul AiMesh combos in this post.
Extra: 6GHz wireless backhaul is no good in an Asus AiMesh setup
If you can’t run network cables and think the new 6GHz band of the latest Wi-Fi 6E standard will bail you out, you’ll be deeply disappointed. (This applies to other non-Asus systems, too, such as the Linksys AXE8400.)
After trying out two GT-AXE11000 units, the 2-pack ZenWiFi ET8, and a combo of these two, I can say for sure that you can’t count on the 6GHz band as backhaul in an AiMesh setup at all. Its range is just too short.
Chances are a Wi-Fi 6E AiMesh wireless system will use the 5GHz or 2.4GHz band as backhaul when you place the hardware units father than 50 feet away from each other or if there’s a wall in between them. As a result, you’ll get a system with much inferior performance to a traditional tri-band alternative, such as the ZenWiFi XT8.
Again, the point is this: Don’t count on the 6GHz unless you live in a small or open space.
But with network cabling, you can use almost any router combo without worrying about performance or reliability.
(“Almost” is the key here. There are some specific sets that you might want to avoid using wired backhauls — more below.)
That said, if you intend to mix hardware of different Wi-Fi grades or standards — dual-stream (2×2) vs. three-stream (3×3) vs. quad-stream (4×4), or Wi-Fi 5 vs. Wi-Fi 6 — then you should think about getting your home wired first.
But generally, if you use dual-band hardware or mix Wi-Fi grades, it’s best to use wired backhauls. And vice versa, if you have wired your home, there’s no need to use traditional tri-band hardware.
Finally, wired backhauling is generally recommended if you use Wi-Fi 6E hardware — such as the GT-AXE11000, or the ZenWiFi ET8.
Traditional tri-band hardware is generally recommended in a fully wireless setup
In a fully wireless setup, you should consider tri-band hardware. Specifically, you want to use broadcasters with an additional 5GHz band that works as the dedicated backhaul. (Again, Wi-Fi 6E hardware doesn’t apply.)
In most cases, using dual-band hardware works, too. However, you will get only 50 percent of the satellite (node) unit’s speed due to signal loss.
So, if you don’t need the node’s top Wi-Fi speed, then dual-band hardware will do. The key is what type of performance you want.
Minimize mixing hardware
It’s always safest in terms of performance and reliability when you use the same routers across the entire system.
However, that’s not a must, and also not exactly economical. Sometimes, you want to mix a router with the best feature set with a more affordable node. Of course, in this case, you’ll get the Wi-Fi performance at each mesh unit according to their hardware specs.
Again, if you use wired backhaul, there’s not much concern here. But if you think of a wireless mesh, it’s best to use routers of the same Wi-Fi standard (Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6) and performance tiers for better reliability.
Specifically, if you use a 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 router as the primary node, the rest of the nodes should also be 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 hardware. The same goes for Wi-Fi 5 equipment.
Rules in mixing hardware
If you have broadcasters of different Wi-Fi standards or Wi-Fi performance tiers — often the case when you buy a new router and want to keep the old one as part of a mesh — then here is what you should do in this particular order when possible:
- Use wired backhaul. A mix of wired and wireless backhaul is still better than full wireless. In this case, the primary router unit should be wired to the first node, but you can also wire just the nodes together.
- Pick the best router for the primary node (this is the device that decides the features of your network):
- It should be one of the highest Wi-Fi tiers, measured in the number of streams (4×4, 3×3, 2×2, etc.).
- It’s the one with the most bands. So, pick the tri-band instead of the dual-band if you have both.
- Use the latest router with the most feature. So pick the Wi-Fi 6 router if you also have Wi-Fi 5 broadcasters.
- Pick the right nodes (you generally have little or no control over the node’s feature or settings):
- Wireless backhaul:
- Use nodes of the same Wi-Fi tier as the router, at least on the 5GHz (backhaul) band. If not, make sure the main router and the satellite node use the same Wi-Fi standards and tier.
- When mixing Wi-Fi standard (Wi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5) you have to use the higher standard hardware in the compatibility mode. Else, they can’t connect reliably if at all.
- Wired backhaul: Use (dual-band) nodes with the performance (when working as a standalone router) of your choice. (The AP mode mentioned in #5 below gives you more options.)
- Wireless backhaul:
- Expect some bugs: Since there are so many possible combos, mixing hardware arbitrarily likely will result in unexpected bugs. This is especially true when you use a fully wireless setup. Again, think about running network cables!
- AP mode (applicable only to a wired home): Consider using a node as a standard access point (AP). While this setup will not give you a real mesh system — you can’t control the AP’s Wi-Fi settings via the main router — it’ll give you excellent performance, reliability, and more control. Specifically:
- You can take full control of the satellite hardware, including some extra features available in the AP mode (Wi-Fi settings, USB-related, lighting, and others).
- If your primary router is a dual-band and the AiMesh satellite is a tri-band, you can then use the node’s 5GHz-2 band, which is not available in the AiMesh mode.
- You can use a third-party router (or AP) or a non-AiMesh Asus router, such as the RT-AC3200.
With that out of the way, below are my experience with certain AiMesh combos.
AiMesh has gone Multi-Gig wired backhaul
For all mesh networks with wireless or Gigabit wired backhauling, you’ll generally get the real-world throughputs slower than Gigabit (sub-Gigabit.)
That’s because a gigabit wired connection has overhead. And the currently fastest wireless connection, between the fastest client and the fastest router, sustains at around 1.5Gbps (Gig+) in a best-case scenario — most of the time, you also get around 1Gbps or slower.
If you want a faster-than-Gigabit network, you must use Multi-Gig wired backhaul.
Going forward, I’ll update the AiMesh performance of Asus’s Multi-Gig-ready routers — such as the GT-AXE16000, GT-AX6000, ZenWiFi Pro ET12, and RT-AX89X — in the post on the Multi-Gig wired backhaul instead.
This post you’re reading is my take on older or sub-Gigabit AiMesh options.
Best AiMesh routers and combos: The battle-tested list
This part results from many hours — days, weeks, and months in most cases — of testing and real-world usage via dozens of AiMesh combos I’ve used (or had access to) since Asus first introduced this feature in early 2018.
Indeed, it consists of AiMesh routers and purposed-built systems, all after my extensive first-hand experience from a couple of weeks to tens of months.
I sorted this list in the order of my experience, newest on top — the order is not the ranking. Go through the entire post, and you’ll find out which fits your needs and budget.
16. ZenWiFi XD6
If the ZenWiFi XT8 (below) is the AiMesh choice for a wireless home, the ZenWiFi XD6 is the wired alternative.
This dual-band purpose-built mesh system is ideal for a home already wired with network cables. Sure, it’ll work well in a wireless setup, but if you want the full Gigabit performance, getting your house wired is the way to go.
Notes on using AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable, only as a 2-pack).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Wi-Fi 6 router with a 4×4 5GHz band, namely itself.
- Wired: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 5 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with the initial firmware.
The ZenWiFi XD6 works best as a wired system by itself (you can use up to six hardware units) or the satellite for a similarly-specced or higher-tier router, such as the RT-AX86U, RT-AX82U, GS-AX5400, RT-AX88U, or the RT-AX89X.
Asus ZenWiFi XD6's Rating
Pros
Fast and reliable Wi-Fi performance
AiMesh 2.0 fully supported
Lots of network settings and useful features, including free real-time online protection for life
Compact design
Presynced hardware, 160Mhz support
Cons
No Multi-Gig or Link aggregation
No USB port
15. GS-AX5400 or TUF AX5400 (or GS-AX3000)
These three gaming routers are the alternatives to the RT-AX82U and RT-AX3000 mentioned below. And they are excellent AiMesh members.
The three are very similar in terms of design and features — they are part of Asus’s new ROG STRIX and TUF gaming series.
The GS-AX5400 and TUF-AX5400 are virtually identical in terms of hardware specs while looking totally different. On the other hand, the GS-AX5400 and GS-AX3000 look exactly the same but of different Wi-Fi tiers.
Since these are dual-band broadcasters, it’s best to use them (either as primary routers or satellite nodes) in a wired setup. But a wireless configuration works, too, especially in the case of the two AX5400 broadcasters, which have the top-tier 5GHz band.
Notes on using AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Wi-Fi 6 router with a 4×4 5GHz band, namely itself.
- Wired: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 5 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with the initial firmware.
- Nodes I’ve used: Themselves, RT-AX86U, RT-AX82U.
Asus ROG STRIX GS-AX5400's Rating
Pros
Excellent overall performance
Complete AiMesh 2.0 support, including system-wide Guest network
Robust web interface, well-designed mobile app, no login account required
Lots of useful features, including those for gamers
Cool-looking front-facing AURA Game light
Cons
No Multi-Gig port or Gamer VPN (WTFast)
Performance as a NAS server could be better
The ROG logo doesn't light up, a bit boring
14. RP-AX56
The RP-AX56 is an extender (repeater) by design and can work with any router. But it works best as an AiMesh node in a wired (recommended) or wireless setup.
Note, though, that this is a modest piece of hardware. It features 2×2 80MHz Wi-Fi 6 and therefore caps at 1.2Gbps at best. Most importantly, it can’t handle DFS or 160MHz channels and won’t work with a router that uses these settings in a wireless setup.
That said, this is a node for those using an entry-level AiMesh router or a high-end one set up with wired backhaul or in compatibility mode (wireless backhaul).
Notes on using AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable).
- Recommended router:
- Wireless: Dual-band 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 routers without the use of DFS or 160MHz channel width.
- Wired: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 5 routers. AP mode is available.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes, with a system-wide Guest network (with the latest firmware.)
- Routers I’ve tried: RT-AX82U, RT-AX3000, RT-AX89X.
Asus RP-AX56 Repeater's Rating
Pros
Affordable
Reliable and relatively fast Wi-Fi with good coverage
Can work as an Access Point, a Media Bridge, an Extender, or an AiMesh node (via wireless or wired backhaul)
Convenient design, excellent web interface
Cons
No 160MHz bandwidth, modest specs
The Initial firmware is a bit buggy (at launch)
Bulky for a snap-on device
13. RT-AX68U
The RT-AX68U is a bit special. It’s the only 3×3 Wi-Fi 6 router on this list, and it’s also quite affordable. It’s a better version of the RT-AC68U that came out a couple of years ago.
Notes on using AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Wi-Fi 6 router with a 3×3 5GHz band, namely itself.
- Wired: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 5 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with the initial firmware.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX68U, ZenWiFi Mini XD4 (wired backhaul).
Asus RT-AX68U's Rating
Pros
Fast performance, excellent range, reliable
Tons of helpful networking features and settings, including AiMesh 2.0
Robust web UI, well-designed mobile app
Excellent NAS performance and features when hosting a storage device
Comparatively affordable
Cons
No Multi-Gig ports or 160MHz channel width support (at launch)
Not wall-mountable
12. RT-AX86U
The Asus RT-AX86U is a safe choice to be an AiMesh host. It’s so far the best dual-band router on the market, after all.
On top of that, this router is an excellent Multi-Gig satellite when working with the RT-AX89X.
Notes on using AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable when using same-tier routers).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 routers with a 4×4 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41535.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX86U, RT-AX82U, RT-AX88U, RT-AX58U, RP-AX56, ZenWiFi XD4, GS-AX5400, and GS-AX3000.
Asus RT-AX86U's Rating
Pros
Fast performance, excellent range, reliable
Tons of helpful networking features and settings
Useful settings for online gaming
Robust web UI, well-designed mobile app
Multi-Gig, WAN/LAN Link Aggregation support
Excellent NAS performance and features when hosting a storage device
Comparatively affordable
Cons
Single, low-speed (2.5Gbps) Multi-Gig port
Not wall-mountable
Gaming features turn Adaptive QoS off
No support for WTFast Gamer VPN
11. RT-AX3000 / RT-AX58U
The RT-AX3000 is virtually the same as the RT-AX58U, and the pair makes an excellent AiMesh setup when you use the wired backhaul.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (not recommended).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 router with a 2×2 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers of the same tier or lower.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41700.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX58U, RP-AX56 (wired and wireless), ZenWiFi XD4 (wired), RT-AC86U (wired).
Asus RT-AX3000 / RT-AX58U's Rating
Pros
160 MHz channel support
Fast and reliable performance
Tons of useful features with excellent AiMesh support
Full web interface and well-design mobile app
Compact design, wall-mountable
Cons
No multi-gig port or Link Aggregation
Modest hardware specs
Relatively short Wi-Fi range
The Parental Control feature could use some improvement
10. RT-AX82U
The Asus RT-AX82U is almost the same as the RT-AX86U above in terms of performance and features. The two share the same 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 band, which is strong enough to handle both backhaul and clients in most cases.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable when using same-tier routers).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 routers with a 4×4 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41700.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX86U, RT-AX58U, ZenWiFi XD4, RT-AC86U, GS-AX5400, and GS-AX3000.
Asus RT-AX82U's Rating
Pros
Excellent performance
Beautiful design with tons of helpful networking, game-related features, and settings
Robust web UI, well-designed mobile app
Comparatively affordable
Cons
No support for WTFast Gamer VPN
No multi-gig network port
Network storage performance (when hosting a portable drive) could use some improvement
Not wall-mountable
9. RT-AX89X
The Asus RT-AX89X is quite different since it’s the only Wi-Fi 6 router on this list that uses a Qualcomm chip. As a result, it doesn’t have the best support for AiMesh — it works best as a standalone router.
But if you’re building a wired network, it can still work as an excellent host. In fact, when coupled with the RT-AX86U (as a satellite), the RT-AX89X is one of the best router options to build a Multi-Gig AiMesh network.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired only. I didn’t have a good experience using this router in a wireless AiMesh setup.
- Recommended nodes: Any dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 5 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes with a system-wide Guest network (via the latest firmware).
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX88U, RT-AX58U, ZenWiFi XD4, RT-AC86U, GS-AX5400, and GS-AX3000.
Asus RT-AX89X's Rating
Pros
Excellent Wi-Fi performance
Uniquely cool design with two 10Gbps network ports
Eight Gigabit network ports with Dual-WAN and Link Aggregation
Super-fast network-attached storage speed when coupled with an external drive
Tons of useful features, including free-for-life real-time online protection and AiMesh
Cons
A bit buggy at launch, relatively expensive
Bulky physical size with an internal fan — potential heat issue in hot environments
Web interface needs work
Not wall-mountable, no universal backup restoration
8. RT-AX88U
In many ways, the RT-AX88U is the Wi-Fi 6 version of the RT-AC88U, which is an excellent router. The two look almost identical and share many similar features, including the eight Gigabit LAN ports and the lack of a multi-gig port.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable when using same-tier routers).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 routers with a 4×4 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41700.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX88U, RT-AX86U, RT-AX58U, ZenWiFi XD4 (wired backhaul), RT-AC86U (wired), RT-AC88U (wired).
Asus RT-AX88U's Rating
Pros
Fast Wi-Fi performance
Tons of useful features
Eight network ports with Dual-WAN and Link Aggregation
Universal setting backup and restoration
Fast network-attached storage speed when coupled with an external drive.
Merlin firmware support
Cons
No multi-gig network port
Buggy firmware (at review)
7. RT-AX92U
A 2-pack Asus RT-AX92U makes an excellent AiMesh wireless mesh system. It also supported wired backhaul well. In many ways, it’s the mini version of the GT-AX11000 below.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired or wireless (tri-band routers only).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers of the same tier, namely itself. 5GHz-band works as the dedicated backhaul.
- Wired: Any Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band is available only at tri-band nodes.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41712.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX92U.
ASUS RT-AX92U's Rating
Pros
Compact design, tri-band specs
Good performance, large coverage
Excellent set of features, including online protection, WTFast VPN for gamers, and system-wide Guest network when working as a mesh
Link Aggregation and Dual-WAN support, wall-mountable
Comparatively affordable
Cons
Wi-Fi 6 available only on one of the 5GHz bands
No Multi-Gig port
6. GT-AX11000
The GT-AX11000 is the full-size version of the RT-AX92U above. It’s an excellent full-feature AiMesh host.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired or wireless (tri-band routers only).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers of the same tier, such as itself or the RT-AX92U. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band works as the dedicated backhaul.
- Wired: Any Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 (dual-band) routers. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band is available only at tri-band nodes.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41712.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX92U, RT-AX88U, RT-AX86U, RT-AX58U, ZenWiFi AX XT8, ZenWiFi XD4 (wired back), Lyra (wired), RT-AC86U (wired), RT-AC88U (wired), Blue Cave (wired).
Asus GT-AX11000's Rating
Pros
Fast and reliable Wi-Fi performance with an excellent range
Lots of useful features for home users
Unique and effective settings for online gaming
Multi-Gig network port, Dual-WAN, Link Aggregation
Mesh ready
Cons
Expensive
Bulky design, loose antennas, non-wall-mountable
Fewer LAN ports than the previous model
Long boot-up time, buggy (at launch), fluctuating Wi-Fi throughputs
5. ZenWiFi AX XT8
This set is the first purpose-built tri-band Wi-Fi 6 AiMesh set. As such, it’s intended primarily to work as a standalone wireless system (no network cables or other hardware involved.)
As a result, while this set support wired backhaul well, using a network cable to connect the two might cause issues when new firmware is released or deliver worse performance, which has happened multiple times since its release.
Important note: Unless you have issues, don’t update to a new firmware immediately. Instead, wait for a subsequent version. When running into problems after an update, revert to the previous firmware version.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (with caution) or wireless (recommended).
- Recommended nodes: Itself.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (vis latest firmware). with system-wide Guest network.
- Nodes I’ve used: 2-pack set.
Asus ZenWiFi XT8's Rating
Pros
Fast Wi-Fi performance and large coverage at a comparatively affordable cost
Improved and flexible AiMesh
Lots of network settings and useful features, including free real-time online protection for life
Full 4×4 dedicated backhaul band with optional wired backhaul support
Multi-Gig WAN port with Dual-WAN and WAN link aggregation
Cons
No 160MHz 4×4 support for Wi-Fi 6 clients in a dedicated wireless backhaul setup
No Multi-Gig LAN port or LAN link aggregation
Only four network ports on each hardware unit
Firmware can be buggy, especially via wired backhaul
Storage performance (when hosting an external drive) could be better
4. ZenWiFi AX Mini XD4
As the name suggests, the XD4 is the mini version of the XT8 above. It works best in the wired backhaul setup, either as a standalone system or the nodes of another dual-band router among those mentioned above.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommend) or wireless (OK with low performance).
- Recommended nodes: Itself.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes, with a system-wide Guest network, right out of the box.
- Nodes I’ve used: 3-pack set.
Asus ZenWiFi AX Mini XD4's Rating
Pros
Reliable performance
Improved AiMesh feature
Guest networking works throughout the system
Useful network settings and feature
Cons
No dedicated backhaul band or 160MHz channel width support
No multi-gig port, Dual-WAN or Link Aggregation
Stripped-down, borderline useless QoS and Parental Control features
Limited number of network ports, switch needed for a complete wired backhaul setup
Non-pre-synced hardware, not wall-mountable
3. ZenWiFi AC CT8
The CT8 is the Wi-Fi 5 version of the XT8 above. It would help if you used it as a standalone mesh set via the wireless backhaul without other AiMesh routers. While it supports wired backhaul, using a network cable to link the hardware might cause firmware-related issues.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (with caution) or wireless (recommended).
- Recommended nodes: Itself.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Partially. No system-wide Guest network yet.
- Nodes I’ve used: 2-pack set
Asus ZenWiFi AC CT8's Rating
Pros
Significantly improved AiMesh feature
Fast performance, excellent Wi-Fi coverage
Tons of useful features and settings, including free network real-time online protection for life
Fast dedicated backhaul, wired backhaul supported
Helpful mobile app
Cons
The web user interface doesn't always work as intended (bugs)
Only 3 LAN ports per router
Not enough setting instructions
Guest networking still has issues
The combo of buggy firmware and auto-update
2. RT-AC88U
This one is the Wi-Fi 5 version of the RT-AX88U above, and that’s the only difference between the two. In an AiMesh system, though, the RT-AC88U, when working as the primary router, should host only Wi-Fi 5 nodes unless you use wired backhauling.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable when using same-tier routers).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 routers with a 4×4 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41535.
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AC88U, Blue Cave, RT-AC86U.
Asus RT-AC88U's Rating
Pros
Fast Wi-Fi performance with excellent coverage
Tons of valuable features, including the ability to guard the network against online threats
Eight LAN ports with Dual-WAN and Link Aggregation
Excellent support for Asus's AiMesh
Merlin firmware support
Cons
Awkwardly placed USB 3.0 ports
Slow network storage speed when coupled with an external hard drive
1. RT-AC86U
This router is the first that supports AiMesh. In other words, together with it, Asus released these mesh features, paving the way to scaleable home Wi-Fi.
Notes on AiMesh:
- Backhaul: Wired (recommended) or wireless (acceptable when using same-tier routers).
- Recommended nodes:
- Wireless: Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 routers with a 4×4 5GHz band.
- Wired: Any Dual-band Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 routers.
- AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.40451
- Nodes I’ve used: RT-AC86U, Blue Cave, Lyra Trio (wired).
Asus RT-AC86U's Rating
Pros
Excellent performance both as a single router and as part of an AiMesh system
AiProtection security for the entire network
Plenty of useful features for home users as well as gamers
Can be restored using backup files of other Asus routers
Cons
No extra network ports like other high-end Asus routers
Not wall mountable
The takeaway
There you go. Pick a combo mentioned above (using the recommended backhaul), and I can almost guarantee you’ll get yourself an excellent mesh system.
Keep in mind that there might be other excellent combos I’ve not tested, and also, I haven’t used all the different scenarios of those mentioned here.
The key is not to mess around too much when everything is working. Keep that in mind, especially when you choose to use the Asus mobile app.
I need a wired mesh setup due to my new larger house/property and the need for better range. I currently have an AX88U. I have gigabit fiber service to my house, a NAS using 2 aggregated LAN ports, and a few other hardwired devices. I’m leaning towards turning the AX88U into a node, and getting one of the new 6e routers, either the AXE16000 or AXE11000. Curious if the 160000 is worth the extra $150 as it will be paired to the AX88u. Thanks!
I’d recommend the AXE16000 over the AXE11000, Caesar. However, in your case, they will likely deliver similar experiences in terms of performance. If you want to save money, get the RT-AX86U instead. That’s the best bang for your buck.
Much appreciated Dong 🙂
Hi Dong,
Great site and info. Thanks for sharing this with the public.
I want a stable mesh network but also a strong wired connection with my main pc. I am thinking getting the RT-AX86U as the main router for the multi-gig support.
Is it possible to connect my main PC with the 2.5g port. And use another 1g port with an AiMesh node? or does it need to be connect via 2.5g. I need wired backhauling.
I prefer stability over speed. What AiMesh nodes would you recommend?
To summarize, cable speed to main pc is most important. After that stability. After that “future proof”. After that cost. After that WiFi speed.
Thanks!
Check the related posts on AiMesh, Thomas. They will answer this question more, in great details.
Hi Dong,
Thank you so much for all your work & posting Information for us!
Quick question:
Recommendation at a secondary router/satellite node to work with my RT-AX88U (as a primary)? It will be wired.
Thanks again!
You can get any AiMesh hardware, Ethan, depending on the speed you’d like. One of these. If you have modest Internet, the RP-AX56 will do.
Hello Dong,
I had 3 RT-AX55 routers.
1 used as main router
2 used as nodes using wired ethernet backhole (each one individually)
The problem with both the nodes was that after a few weeks they lost connection. I had to reset them completely and assign them as nodes all over again. This happenend every few weeks, so I sent them back to where I bought them.
The reason I tell this, is because I didn’t see this combo in your test. It also might be important for other people who would buy the same combo.
It would be interesting if someone else with the same set-up could share their experiance.
They are not on my list for a reason, Peter. Thanks for the input though.
Hi Dong,
Which one will you suggest?
-ASUS RT-92U AX6100 2 pack or
-Linksys Velop MX4200 2 pack?
I can get both at similar price ($260 now)
My internet is 600MB, and I can wired them together as mesh.
When I read the spec. the RT92U has only 1 ax radio and the other 2 are only ac and n,
while Linksys MX4200 have all ax on all 3 radios.
Does that means I can have a more stable speed with Linksys?
ASUS RT92U
• 4804 Mbps – 4SS 5GHz 802.11ax (160MHz chan.),
• 867 Mbps – 2SS 5GHz 802.11ac (80MHz chan.),
• 400 Mbps – 2SS 2.4GHz 802.11n (40MHz chan.) = AX6100 class
Linksys MX4200
• 2402 Mbps – 4SS 5GHz 802.11ax (80MHz chan.)
• 1201 Mbps – 2SS 5GHz 802.11ax (80MHz chan.)
• 574 Mbps – 2SS 2.4GHz 802.11ax (40MHz chan.) = AX4200 class
I’d go with the Asus, and open it Wi-Fi 6 band to clients, read the reviews for more. Don’t get too hung up on the specs.
Thank you Dong for the informative posts.
I’d appreciate some advice on my home upgrade.
I currently have an old AC1900 RT-AC68U to cover whole home. However signal is very poor in the upstairs bedrooms (concrete walls)
For compatibility & price, I was thinking of upgrading to AC86U as main router and using the old 68u as a wireless satellite node if the 86u does not improve the coverage upstairs.
Wired backhaul is unfortunately not possible.
Is there any advantage going with AX86 or AX88 instead of AC86 as main router given the majority of equipment on the network is Wi-Fi 5?
Similarly, would there be any benefit in upgrading system to newer Zen Wi-Fi XD6 (hub & satellite)? XT8 looks like better solution though is too costly.
From what I can gather based on your posts, the additional cost for newer Wi-Fi 6 options may not be very beneficial in my case. (Basic home use with 10-15 devices and max 1000Mbps fibre to home).
What would you recommend:
1/ AC86u (with AC68u if required)
2/ AX86 or AX88 (with AC68u if required)
3/ XD-6 (2 pack)
4/ other cost effective option?
Thank you for your feedback
You can try any of those options, but you should generally use routers of the same Wi-Fi standard. Note, though:
1. Depending on how the concrete wall is, none of them will help much. You’d still get a slow Internet connection (despite having a full-bar Wi-Fi signal upstairs.) More in this post.
2. Your home is not “basic”, it’s as demanding as any home, if not more demanding than most.
3. Running a cable is a must, it’s the only way in your case.
Dong – Thank you for the quick response
Whilst I appreciate that wired backhaul is by far the best option it’s unfortunately the most impractical in this instance.
I understand that the beam strength/coverage can be quite site specific though is there a particular model router I could expect better signal from to use at the hub?
If I cannot get a suitably strong wireless signal from the hub to the satellite, I may have to try a powerline extender.
Under this scenario – and understanding that powerline in general is slow, unpredictable and may not even work – would it make sense to use a kit with built-in Wi-Fi or to use non Wi-Fi extender and connect my old AC68u to the extender in the bedroom?
Not ideal though possibly better than my current setup
Thank you
I don’t have specific answers, Paul. It’s really impossible to know from afar. Try one and find out. Follow my suggestions in the post linked in the previous reply.
Thanks Dong – very informative site. I’ll play around with some options to see what works best
Sure, Paul. Good luck 🤞! And thanks!
Hi Dong, I have a AC88U which is now 6 years old, and perhaps showing its age. I want to upgrade my network, and was looking at GT-AX6000, ASUS RT-AX89X, or GT-AX11000 &/or its expensive brother GT-AXE11000.
My network bands 2.4Ghz are crowded with ‘smart devices’ maybe 6-8 of them, and my 5Ghz is also crowded with (6-8) devices + 4: 1/100 & 1/1000 plugged in. My current only Wifi 6 device is my iPhone 12, but need to look to the future. I 4K stream allot, but dont necessary ‘game’ – i know my routers are mostly gaming choices. Having a 2.5G or 10G port isnt a must, but could be useful as I am now using Cloud NAS (AWS), as opposed to local NAS.
What I am looking for is strong radio antenna’s that can manage at least 20 devices on my network, with strong coverage (2000sq), I like QoS function for priority, firewall/anti (as standard) and having a VPN on the device is great, but find they significantly degrade speeds compared to client apps on Shield (at least on the AC88U) .
I could/would maybe use the AIMESH using the old AC88U (for while), but a backhaul wire may be challenging (unless I use a 1GB powerline) option.
That being said what would you suggest. I saw some of these ‘new routers’ manage the 2.4Ghz bands poorly, which would defeat my upgrade purpose (somewhat). I do like ASUS, but could be tempted to other brands. Any advice on what I should pick?
I’d strongly recommend you read this post, Ramy. You’d understand what a router can do instead of just caring about what you want one to do for you. The latter is fine but will not help in finding what you need/want. After that, pick one on this Wi-Fi 6 list or this Wi-Fi 6E list.
Hi Dong, thank you firstly for this treasure trove of information.
But if you could assist me in understanding.
Under your section “Rules in mixing hardware” I’m getting lost on the terminology when you say “primary node”, “node” and “satellite”.
For example, I’d like to take the RT-AX68U path you proposed above.
But I’m trying to work out the network configuration.
So from the broadband providers modem, you connect to a WAN port of the RT-AX68U. This is what you call the Primary node?
Then I could use another RT-AX68U as a downstream Node? This would also be a wired connection. Which ports of each device would I connect to? An LAN of the Primary node and the WAN port of the downstream Node?
I currently have a RT-AC87U, which I know isn’t Aimesh compatible, but could it be used as an AP or what you class as a Satellite in your terminology above?
Lastly, doesn’t eh AiMesh system have some degree of self-configuration once 2 AiMesh models see each other?
Sorry for all the noob questions, but I want to make sure my purchases will work with each other and how they go together.
Regards
Brad
More on that in this post, Brad. But
1. Router, primary router (or primary node): That’s the main router of your mesh system.
2. A satellite node (or node): A device that extends the Wi-Fi network within your system — more in this post.
I think you’re confused because you’re, like many, still at the stage of not caring/knowing know what is what. You’ve probably read too many articles with nonsensical terminologies, hype, and “advice” from popular tech sites. (There’s no such thing as “downstream node,” by the way.) I’d recommend starting with this explainer post, things will be clear when you’re through with it. Also, make sure you follow the related posts/links. They are there for a reason.
Hi Dong, thanks for the response. I’ve done more homework based on your feedback.
As I’m on a budget, I’ve looked at your list, being a little expensive I’ve ventured into older models:
I’d like to deploy 3 nodes around the house/garage.
Primary Node: RT-AX55U (AUD$170)
802.11a : up to 54 Mbps
802.11b : up to 11 Mbps
802.11g : up to 54 Mbps
WiFi 4 (802.11n) : up to 300 Mbps
WiFi 5 (802.11ac) : up to 867 Mbps
WiFi 6 (802.11ax) (2.4GHz) : up to 574 Mbps
WiFi 6 (802.11ax) (5GHz) : up to 1201 Mbps
Satellite Nodes: RT-AC59U V2 (AUD$109)
802.11a : up to 54 Mbps
802.11b : up to 11 Mbps
802.11g : up to 54 Mbps
802.11n : up to 600 Mbps
802.11ac (5GHz) : up to 867 Mbps
Although for around the same money ZenWiFi AX Mini XD4 could give me presence in 3 locations.
802.11a : up to 54 Mbps
802.11b : up to 11 Mbps
802.11g : up to 54 Mbps
WiFi 4 (802.11n) : up to 300 Mbps
WiFi 5 (802.11ac) : up to 867 Mbps
WiFi 6 (802.11ax) (2.4GHz) : up to 574 Mbps
WiFi 6 (802.11ax) (5GHz) : up to 1201 Mbps
In both scenarios they will use Ethernet Backhaul.
I can see the major advantage of the Zen Wifi is WiFi 6 in all locations, but that’s not my main goal.
Can you advise on my 2 suggestions? Performance, drawbacks?
Thanks again.
Brad
I haven’t tested any of those, Brad, but the RT-AX55U should work well via wired backhauls. It’s similar to the RT-AX56U and RP-AX56. For setup, check out this post.
Thanks Dong!
Thank you, Dong!
Sure, Josh! Good luck!
Hi dong,
I currently have 2x Rt-Ac86u units in ai mesh, do you think it’s worth it to upgrade to the XT8 2 pack? I have 750 mb/s and might upgrade to gigabit in the future. The XT8 would set me back 465 canadian.
That depends on if you use wired or wireless backhauling, Andrew. Try this post again in its entirety, especially the top part. And read the review of the XT8 for more.:)
The setup I have for the last couple of months is the following:
GT-AX11000 – Wi-Fi 6, Triband
TUF Gaming AX5400 x2 – Wi-Fi 6, Dual Band
RT-AX55 x2 – Wi-Fi 6, Dual Band
My house is quite long with thick walls so during the summer I installed Cat 8 cables (serious overkill, I like futureproofing) all over the house, ports in most rooms so I connect the AiMesh via ethernet Backhaul, and I have to say it is the strongest and most reliable internet I have ever come accross in a residential home. I have a long ethernet cable going outside underground to our sheds to one of the AX55’s and and an access point (Cheap TP Link AP, struggle to find outdoor Asus AiMesh AP) on the roof sending up to around 150mbs over 250 meters away for camera’s etc. The seconnd 5GHz network from the AX1000 is used for gaming and file transfers to and from the cloud, this router is placed centrally in the house for these purposes. When I’m not working then the 2.4 and other 5ghz networks are everywhere else for any device. No problems with the second 5ghz network not being spread through the AiMesh because of the dual band nodes. We have approx 80-90 devices connected at all times. Flawless performance.
Recently I installed a full ubiquiti network in my home as I thought I would further improve it. But it didn’t by a long shot, the phrase, you cant improve on perfection comes to mind. I returned it all the same week.
I have also used my AiMesh setup wirelessly as well to compare and it still pushed out 750mbs everywhere (apart from outside obviously) from my gigabit connection.
No matter what you do or how your house is layed out, I highly recommend using ethernet backhaul, Install it, or hire someone to do it if you can’t. You simply can’t go wrong.
Rant complete!
Thanks for the rant, Cian. And yes, I totally agreed on getting the home wired.
Does guest ssid work in your aimesh setup?
This post will answer that question and others, Peter. https://dongknows.com/asus-aimesh-overview/
HI Dong,
Could you comment on wired mesh versus wired access point configuration. I have two RT-AC68U routers, with one set up as an access point for a dead zone, running Merlin. Seems to work but am wondering if handoffs would be smoother moving from one zone to the other.
Thanks,
I already did in this post on mesh systems, Joe. Check out the hand-off section.
Hello Dong,
I am about to get google fiber multigig services and am going to use the RT-AX6000 as my primary and was thinking to AiMesh two AX92U in a ethernet backhaul. The reason I am going with the RT-AX6000 is its dual wan/lan 2.5g ports and the Asus brand for the QOS control and Parental controls. Luckily I will also be utilizing a 2.5g switch with this setup using the full potential of that extra 2.5g LAN port.
The question I have for you is what features will I be limited to while using the AX92U’s as my mesh routers? I am assuming just the AX92U second 5-GHz band?
One thing to note that I am not worried about the best wifi speeds as I prefer to use hardwire when gaming or downloading.
You got it, Chris. You can also use the node as a separate mesh in AP mode on top of the GT. The RT-AX92u has no multi-Gid port tho. https://dongknows.com/best-multi-gig-wired-backhaul-aimesh-combos/
Hi Dong,
I have an AX-86U. I want to extend my wireless system. Do you have any recommendations for a decent device with a good price?
Pick one that has the same 5GHz specs as the RT-AX86U, Kit. So another unit, or the RT-AX82U, or TUF-AX5400, or GS-AX5400, etc. It’s best to run a network cable though.
Hi Dong,
Thanks for your reply. It is kinda hard and expensive to run a network cables system here. I prefer to use a wireless mesh system. are those mentioned devices still good options? And, which one should be the main router, and which one is the satellite?
They are, Kit. And read the post for your answers.
Hi Dong
Thanks for the great posts.
I am using an AX 92u mesh setup with 2 units. It seems the 5ghz-2\802.11ax is only available on one of the bands and only for backhaul. When I try to connect my wifi 6 compatible smartphone to that band, speeds drop. I also recently purchased tplink W7200 which seems to be using 802.11ax on all three bands. Is that correct?
What you experienced was the difference between dedicated and non-dedicated backhaul, Ash. As for the TP-Link its datasheet will tell you what it is.
With non dedicated backhaul, when I connect my phone to the 5ghz-2 bandwidth, speeds are slower. Likely because of its small range.
Either that or your device doesn’t support Wi-Fi 6 and therefore works better with the 5GHz-1 which is Wi-Fi 5. More in this post.
Thank you for the excellent article! I have a dual XT8 wireless setup in a 2×1300 sq ft house. Had to place the primary node in one corner of the house as I have the internet input there. I have a good reception in the surrounding rooms, and as the second node is below it the coverage is ok at the lower floor as well.
I still have some coverage issues on the floor with the main node – I get poor reception on the other side of the house, with a Google Chromecast unit loosing connection occasionally.
Is there any cheaper option for a reliable 3rd wireless unit other than an additional XT8 to place in that area? AFAIK the Chromecast would require only about ~50 Mbps tops for 4K streaming, can I “risk” to add a cheaper dual-band Wifi 6 unit like the AX55? Or is it worth to try mixing the tri-band routers with an AX92U, I could buy that one for about 30% cheaper than the XT8.
You want another tri-band unit, K. Or if you can run a cable, the RP-AX56 works, too.
I have a GT-AC5300and an existing RT-AC68U in mesh mode (wireless).
Would adding another RT-AC68U be the best option to extend coverage?
Thanks in advance
I don’t know about “best” since I haven’t tried the exact combo, but it should work as well as the current setup, Andy. For really the best result, though, you should run a network cable or two for wired backhaul.
Perfect.. Done and its working well .
Thanks for your help.
hi Dong, Will it be work if i setup 2 x Asus XD6 with mesh and add a TPLink AX6000 (my old router) as AP?
i’m re-using the old router as AP if the mesh can’t cover the area across 4 storeys. Or will it be better just to use only AP mode if i need to use all 3 routers?
Yes, you can use an AP with any existing network that has a network port for it, Kean.
hi, i realised i need more LAN ports at the main node and my current tplink ax6000 has enough. In your opinon, which is a better setup:
1. tplink AX6000 + 2 x Asus XD6 (as AP)
2. tplink AX6000 + 2 x tplink ax73 or deco x60
3. asus AX82u + 2 x Asus XD6 (most costly as all will be new)
or any other suggestions?
Thanks!
Assuming your place is wired, I’d go with #3, K. Get a switch if you need more ports. Gigabit switches are very affordable these days.
Hi Dong, thanks so much for all the info – it’s super helpful!
I’ve currently got an AX88u as my main router and it’s really great. However the range is not quite good enough to reach my extension at full speed so I’m currently thinking about expanding my network using a wireless only aimesh setup (yes I know, not the best especially given it’s dual band and no dedicated wireless backhaul but it’s the only decent option as I can’t get my home wired at the moment and I think I would still get better performance using this than powerline adapters, especially given I’m in an old property and my extension has a different power circuit to the rest of the house).
I wanted to see whether you had any views on what would happen if I added an aimesh router (maybe another ax88u) as a node wirelessly (with no dedicated wireless backhaul given dual band only) but then plugging in all the devices needing to connect to the node via ethernet gigabit LAN. Would that prevent any of the performance loss given that it would only have to send wireless signals and not receive them, effectively functioning as a wireless bridge? To be clear, the 5Ghz band on the node would function as a backhaul to the main router and as a usable network but no devices would connect to it in the extension. If I do in the future have any wireless devices in the extension I’d connect them to the 2.4Ghz band only (having split 5ghz and 2.4ghz networks) to give maximum bandwidth to the 5Ghz backhaul and the ethernet devices in the extension.
What do you think?
Sure, Jake.
It’s all about specificities, so I can’t say much. However, first of all, you should check out this post on the mesh to know how to arrange the hardware in a wireless setup. With that, you need to use the 2nd unit as an AiMesh node if you want the best coverage — you can place it between the main router and the area that needs better Wi-Fi. But in this case, it’s hard to use network cables to hook your far devices to it, and there’s no way to not make its Wi-Fi unavailable to clients. But generally, it should work.
Alternatively, you can use the 2nd unit in bridge mode — it’s now a Wi-Fi-to-Wired adapter. In this case, you can make the 5GHz band work solely as the backhaul for wired clients. But you must place it near the clients themselves, which might be restrictive in terms of placement.
It’s best to run a network cable, but you already know that.
Hi Dong.
You said to consider using the node as an Access Point. But wouldn’t I have the problem of being close to a router and my cell phone still being connected to another router farther away with worse signal?
Do you think it’s better to use the same ssid for AP?
Thank you
Yes, Vlad. But that’s still better than the alternative. The hand-off is a very tricky business. More here.
##if you have wired your home, there’s no need to use traditional tri-band hardware##
1) isn’t tri-band hardware better to connect users to different bands at the same time?
Read this post. You’ve been asking way too many questions without reading… Take your time, and respect the rules. This is the last warning.
##if you have wired your home, there’s no need to use traditional tri-band hardware##
aren’t those bands also used by client hardware(smartphone, PCs, etc) to communicate?
Check out this post on what the bands mean.
thanks for answering and congratulation on making so many good articles.
1) I have read that article before writing my question. but even if I have read it slowly and googled for many of the terms that I found in the article, I am aware that there are still some things that I haven’t properly understood and reading it again wont help me, so that is why I am have asked and I would like that you answer.
2) I am deciding now to buy a new router and I think that I will buy an ASUS mesh system but I talked with a guy and he said that he had also an ASUS top router but sold it because it doesn’t have many security features as the enterprise routers have. he is working in an IT company and has access to enterprise hardware. so, would u consider of making a small article about enterprise vs non enterprise router?
No, I don’t have time for #2. But getting an enterprise router for your home is like getting a school bus for your commute. And considering you have to ask questions like these, an enterprise router sure is not a good fit. My advice is stop taking advice from those who want to show off their “knowledge”. Instead, spend time on these articles and you’ll figure things out. Other than that, I have no additional suggestions or answers for you.
please answer the question 1), i am not able to figure it out. thanks
There was no question in your #1 above. But again, this post will help. You need to spend time and read to find out yourself.
Is there a config where the ASUS router can be used as a router alone without Wi-Fi but then have other routers connected to them with WiFi and mesh enabled?
Yes, Abbas, you can just turn its Wi-Fi radios off, one band at a time. You can do that using its web interface: Wireless -> Professional tab.
Thank you. I should have described in a bit more detail. If I turn the radios off on the main router, can I still use AIMesh with other ASUS nodes connected to it?
That depends on the combo you use and whether or not you use wired backhaul. In any case, I wouldn’t do that.
Gotcha. So if I wanted to go ahead with ET8s with a wired backhauld as nodes and use all three bands for WiFi (2.4/5/6), which router would you recommend I use as my main? One thats compatible with Merlin as it will replace FWG.
Appreciate your help.
Hi Dong,
I have Asus AXE11000 with two AX92U working as nodes in a mesh. When I set them up it configured the router with 3 wifi channels 2.4, 5 and 6Ghz.
I have the AXE11000 setup downstairs and one node upstairs and one in my garage. Works pretty well but I connect my iphone to the 6ghz in the garage where I work and it stays connected fine and when I go upstairs it is fine there. But when I go down to where the axe11000 is I lose signal even though I am just a few feet away. Its like it is not broadcasting from the main router. It seems t broadcast the 5ghz network from there okay. Would this be normal or did I miss something?
By the way I came across your site looking for information and I very much enjoyed reading through some of your articles. Very informative with very good real world information along with enjoyable reading style. You have a new fan!
Thank you,
Steve
Thanks, Steve. Happy to have you! 🙂
I assumed you mean you set up three bands as three SSIDs. In that case, the 6GHz is only available at the GT-AXE11000 location. If so, your case is not normal, the 6GHz band should work better when you’re close to the router. However, if you set up the three hardware units in a wireless configuration, things can be unpredictable. The GT-AXE1000 should be used in a mesh only if you have a wired backhaul as I mentioned in its review. More about AiMesh combos in this post.
I am considering the Asus BRT-AC828 Dual WAN AC2600 for the primary and my existing AC86U as a node. Anyone have any experience with this combo? I will have a wired backhaul connecting these two routers. Also, open to other suggestions. I have no need for AX/WIFI6 for the near future but Dual WAN with failover is essential. TIA.
Most Asus routers support failover Dual-WAN. I haven’t tried the BRT-AC828 but if it features AiMesh then the combo you have will work well via the wired backhaul. If it doesn’t, you’ll need to use the RT-AC86U in the AP mode and that should work out well, too.
Ugh! Turns out the BRT-AC828 does NOT have aimesh at all. Silly me, I just assumed these features would be there as I went up the price range.
That’s too bad. It happens.
PS: Is there an error in the AC86U’s ratings section? It says Asus RT-AX86U’s Rating and the pros and cons look like they’re from the AX versions including the picture.
It was a typo in the coding. 😳 Fixed. Thanks!
Hi Dong,
I am in need of some mesh advice though before I get there into the details, please take note that a wired backhaul solution would not be possible given that I am staying in a rental home and as such would like to look at a wireless option.
What AX-based Asus main router and node (1x) combo would you recommend if one has Gigabit internet connectivity? I know that realistically it will be difficult to attain Gigabit speed at the wireless clients’ ends due to several factors, though which setup would get me close to it (700-900Mbps) in real world scenarios for clients connecting from the node with a wireless backhaul in between ?
I looked at the RT-AX92 as an option given the strong wireless backhaul though I am of the understanding that the other 5Ghz band only supports WiFi 5 (AC) which would give a theoretical throughput of ~800Mps, though will likely be quite a bit less.
Many thanks!
Read the post, Charl. You’re at the right spot. The entire post is my advice to you, so make sure you pay some attention.
Hi Dong… thanks for this article. Based on your experience, I have a proposed solution to my networking issues.
I currently have a network in a 3-story home (5,500 sq.ft.) that is limping along. My main router is the Asus RT-AC86U, and I have 1 Apple Airport Extreme and 3 Apple Airport Express routers in bridge mode all using the same SSID. I have been using this setup (with earlier Asus routers) for several years as my form of mesh system.
I am now looking at getting the Asus RT-AX68U as my main router and using the RT-AC86U as a node, plus adding in the 3 pack of ZenWiFi XD4 as additional nodes. My house is wired (Cat5e) so connecting them together is not an issue.
My main issue, with the current setup, is that recently I seem to have a lot of dead WiFi spots that are a problem when we are on our iPhones or iPads! Since every room is wired, our direct connections to computers continue to work well
Does this setup make sense?
Remove the Wi-Fi 5 hardware and it’ll make a lot of sense, Gary. Do it!
Hi Dong. Thanks for sharing your valuable knowledge and experience! I have an RT-AX86U and now need to strengthen my wifi signal on the other end of my house for a newly installed Ring Floodlight Cam Pro. It isn’t going to be easy to run a wired backhaul and in the short run, I may have to go wireless. I’ve read your article but still not certain which aimesh router would be a good option for me. I’m looking for something less expensive than my AX86U, preferably $150 or less. I have 1 gig AT&T fiber coming in to my AX86U. Do you have any suggestions or can you point me to one of your articles that might help me decide? Thanks!
Hi Eric. I have this type of question a lot — more in this post. So you start with that one. After that, this post on using multiple broadcasters will help. You’re close, but only you can figure this out since you’re there.
I appreciate your reply Dong. Lot’s of info in those articles, some of which I know plus lots of new stuff. Thanks for sharing your knowledge & expertise. I’m pretty sure I’ll be looking at the RT-AX58U/AX3000 or if I want to spend a little more or get refurbished, the AX82U. More than likely I’m going to get the AX58U. I guess I’ll give it a try in wireless mode recognizing it will hurt my WiFi speed but perhaps the drop in performance will not make a big difference for how my network is used. If it does, in the short run, I can just get a very long patch cable and temporarily run it across my house until I can get a professional wiring job done. I knew this was going to be an issue for me when I chose the 2-band router rather than a more expensive 3-band router but I’ll just need to make the best with what I have for now.
Thanks for all your posts. Really helped me decide on the Zenwifi XT8 for my setup having just moved house. It is definitely overkill as fibre to property hasn’t reached my area yet but I am getting the maximum speed over most of the house now.
I would like to set up some PoE cameras monitoring the garden from the outbuilding and was wondering if I could use a much cheaper XD4 node for this instead. Now I know you recommend not pairing the XT8 with a dual band node, but would it work if I turned off the wireless signal for the node and purely used it for an ethernet connection to a network switch to power the cameras? Slightly out of the box but seems a lot simpler than running a lots of cables outside.
Your question is a bit confusing, Mikey. You don’t need the XD4 if you use PoE. More in this post. https://dongknows.com/power-over-ethernet-poe-explained/
Sorry I mean to avoid running an ethernet cable a long way as the position of the cameras would be a long way from an existing ethernet port. My idea was to use an XD4 for its ethernet connection into a PoE injector
The XD4 likely won’t work. It doesn’t have enough ports on the satellite unit. But you can use any other AiMesh router.
Hi Dong,
Since you’ve tried both these options for the Asus ax11000, which would you suggest as nodes for aimesh?
XT8 or AX92U
Thanks
Either is fine. Check their reviews for more.
Hi Dong,
I’m trying to decide between an XD6 Zen Wifi setup OR an AX82u (router) and AX3000 pair (node). My home is about 3500 sf, 3 stories, and wired with cat5e, so I plan to use wired backhaul. Internet service is 1Gig and I have a synology ds220+. I think the only thing I would be missing with the Zen wifi setup is the link aggregation to increase throughput to/from the NAS. However I think 1gbps would be sufficient for my wired devices (desktop, printer, NAS, and wired backhaul to the node).
Is there any reason that you feel i’d be better off with the aiMesh setup with the pair of routers vs the Zen wifi setup? Based on your reviews, it appears that the XD6 seems to be a fairly robust system in terms of speed
I’d recommend the 82U as the main router and the XD6 as the satellites, Dominic, that’s if you need three units. But your option works, too. The only thing better to go with the ZenWiFi is the lower cost.
Hi Dong,
I’ve got a very similar set up to Dominic with 3,500 sqft over 2 levels with 3 x Cat 7 cables to key rooms in the house (1 to the office and 2 to TV rooms). Before I found your site (brilliant btw!) I was planning to go with the Asus Zenwifi XT8 (one as the main router and one as a node one level up to act as a wired backhaul). But now I’m thinking it might be better to go with an AX86U as the main router downstairs and 2 XD6 satellite units (one as a wired backhaul upstairs and the other as a mesh satellite at the other end downstairs towards the kids rooms).
Does that sound about right?
The RT-AX86U + 2x XD6 is the best option, Chris.
hi dong,
thanks for all the great articles.
i wanted to see your opinion on possibly replacing my asus ax11000/asus gt 5300 combo with either an axe11000 or 89x. i am going to keep the ax11000 and the setup would be in our new home when we move in is to use it as a wired backhaul mesh setup since our new home will have wired access throughout but would still want wifi access/coverage. thanks
I’d get another AX11000 or an RT-AX92U, Jun.
perfect, appreciate it!
or it just dawned on me, would you suggest getting 2 asus axe11000? i could have the option on changing my asus ax11000 to an axe11000. thanks again.
No, I don’t really recommend Wi-Fi 6E yet, Jun. In a wireless setup, the AXE will be a lot worse than the AX. More in this post.
ok, good read, i didn’t run into that article, thanks for pointing it out, makes perfect sense. i’ll wait until it becomes more mainstream and see where we are at then. i do love the look of the axe11000 though but if i can’t use it to its full potential then i see no point to it now. thanks again!
Hi Doug – really helpful info as I’ve recently taken a Fibre to the property connection of 550 Gig and can expand to 900gig in future.
I’ve currently got Google Wi-Fi / Google Nest Wi-Fi with 8 nodes (all bar 1 are on wired back haul).
As the Wi-Fi performance is not able to match my new service and having read your articles, the XD6 seemed to be the way to go given all bar one of my end points can be wired. I have a couple of questions..
1 – As only 1 node location (basement) would be likely reliant upon a mesh connection (from node in room directly above) would you still go for the XD6 (it might prove that if this has a stronger signal – I can do without the basement node
2 – I note in this article you state XD 6 – maximum of 6 nodes…. If I can’t cover all of the property without more than this and if XD6 can’t do more than 6 – can one put say the RT-AX86U router as the main point and then run 6 x XD6 nodes downstream or does the AI mesh system limit all combinations to a maximum of 6 units?
Many thanks
Stuart
The name is Dong, Stuart.
1. You should read the top part of this post again, closely.
2. Generally, you should use more than 3 hardware units in a wireless setup — more in this post. AiMesh allows for a maximum of 7 (including the router) — more in this post. If you need to use lots of hardware units, use an enterprise solution, like this one, instead.
Many thanks Dong for the additional links and reading – most helpful
Apologies for the error.
Much appreciated
Stuart
Hi Dong, I have been using an AC68U for a couple of years and I’m thinking of expanding my network setup with the AX86U as my main router and use the AC68U as a mesh node. I understand AC68U don´t support the Smart Connect feature by itself. Could I expand the use of Smart Connect from the AX86U when they will work together?
YOu should do that only if you use wired backhaul, Alejandro. And, no, but you can use the two bands separately but with the same name and password.
Thank you Dong for your quick answer. I intend to use a wired backhaul. If I use your suggestion how the system will decide the best connection. Will be this a sort of smart connect anyway?
Smart Connect is not that “smart” since it tends to use the 2.4GHz which always has stronger signal. It’s more of a convinience. I personally always separate them as two different networks to have better control of which I connect to.
But that way you are not able to use the stronger /faster signal when you move around your house.
That’s right. You can’t have everything. SmartConnect doesn’t work consistently, and when it doesn’t, you CAN’T pick and choose, which is more important to me. When you have multiple broadcasters, chances are the 5GHz band has enough coverage anyway.
Right now I have a tplink extender to expand the coverage of my asus router on the far end of my apartment (kitchen). When I near the router my tablet connects to it but if I move to the kitchen it lose connection and it is not able to automatically connect to the extender that have better signal in that place. I have to manually disconnect from the router signal y connect to the extender. This is the situation I want to avoid with the use of smart connect (band steering) and the reason to purchase a new router. Dou you have any suggestion to solve my case?
Check out this post, Alejandro. Make sure you pay close attenion, too.
Hi Dong, I’m thinking of getting the AX86U as my main router. My ISP offers a contract bundle that pairs it with a “free” WTFast Gamer VPN subscription. But I noticed that you mentioned that the cons of the AX86U is that it has “No support for WTFast Gamer VPN”. What are the implications if I decide to go ahead with the bundle? (Sorry if it’s a silly question. First time on your site/such a site, and am a tech noob)
That means the WTF will only work at the PC level and not the network level, Milton. Check out the review of the GT-AX11000 for more. But you’ll be fine with the 86U.
in response to your comment about not being a good combo: I know the higher rated router should be the primary and I am working on that with a GT-AX11000 soon…
but I would appreciate your comments on accessing the current correct/mesh-modified IP using “nslookup hostname” or its Powershell equivalent. I know the long way around digging through the router.
Actually no, your current router is great, Jim. You’ll know why it’s not a good combo if you read this post. But here’s the gist: you’re mixing dual-band and tri-band, and since you have wired backhauls, tri-band is unnecessary. It seems you don’t like reading and only focus on what you want to believe (which is not necessarily how things are supposed to be.) I’d not bother with nslookup and other tools, in your case. For one, it’s not working out. The “long way around” that you “know” might just be the shortest way. Just follow the link I mentioned, or not, but I’m not here to give you comments to validate what you want to believe. 🙂
if you do not know the answer, just say so! just forgetting about the issue is not an answer or an option for me. you sound like you work for Asus.
Good luck, Jim.
Hey Dong, thanks for the awesome article!
I have a GT-AC5300 and a RT-AC5300 meshed atm but it’s not enough in my two storey home for good coverage in some corners of my home. I have no option for a wired backhaul. The two routers are about 30 feet apart across different floors. (dedicated 5ghz-2 wireless backhaul connect seems okay)
What would you do to improve my setup?
Option 1 = Add GT-AX11000 as the new main router with the other two being nodes
Option 2 = Scrap both existing routers, and get two GT-AX11000.
Option 3 = Add RT-AX92U (2-pack) to the existing mesh setup. (will end up with 4 all up) (Reason being this 2-pack is cheaper than a single GT-AX11000)
Option 4 = Something else you rather recommend.
Thanks!
Run network cables, Jay. Also, read this post closely, that’d help.
Is there no good wireless solution out there for multiple stories? I’ve run into your articles a couple of times when googling for it. Each time it has been someone asking about multiple stories, each time you have answered in a way that a cable is the only good solution.
Hello Dong,
I have a AX86U working well, but I got poor reception on second floor and was considering getting another AX86U as node. With the current main router location, it would be difficult to have wired backhaul connection. After reading all your post, I think this should be an okay combination, but the problem now is AX86U is out of stock everywhere, and Amazon has increased the price by almost $100, which makes it not that good of a deal. Do you have any other suggestions?
Thanks
Ivan
My suggestions are in this post, Ivan. Give it a serious read!
I’ve done alot of reading and have narrowed it down to either the AX92u or AX82u (due to a combination of current promotions and your guides). I plan to get a second one down the line if needed for AIMesh running wirelessly but will start off with just 1 unit for a 1900sqft home. Which would you recommend?
I have gigabit fibre internet just installed also which I forgot to add.
Thanks so much again Dong!
If you intend to have wireless AiMesh down the line, then the RT-AX92U is a must, Jonathan.
Wow thanks for the quick response. And if I don’t plan on AiMesh down the line, RT-AX82U would be better as a standalone option?
I do have fiber internet and currently have the nighthawk X6S R8000P. I would like to upgrade to WI Fi 6.
If I wanted the best of the best performing Aimesh combo with no budget what would it be?
Would this combo better performing than the Orbi 6 RBK852 AX6000 or a single Rapture AX11000?
My home is about 2000 sq feet, with a bunch of smart devices(ring, security cameras, gaming pc, multiple cellphones and laptop etc…) I do have cat 5e running through my wall jacks in my home. I can hardwire my satellites.
Thank you!
Check out this post, Roederick. That’s the combo I use.
Thank you for the reply!
If I purchased the GT-AX11000 as my primary router, what would be the best node or satellite to pair it with? I would be utilizing a wired backhaul using a switch.
Thank you so much!
Read the post I linked in the previous reply, R.
Dong, I do greatly appreciate your expertise. These articles are fantastic in their breadth and depth. Really, nothing exists like it. It’s an invaluable resource.
Would you agree that this is a good solution?
Main Router: AX11000 (tri-band because at least one node will be wireless and I want the most effective backhaul possible)
Wireless Nodes: XT8
Wired Nodes: AX88 or AX86
(As mentioned in my previous comment, I’m still puzzled why you exclusively recommend the AX92U for *wireless* mesh with AX11000 instead of or in addition to XT8.)
That’s was my REAL-WORLD experience, Ira. “Exclusively” where? I didn’t test all and every scenario as I mentioned at the bottom of the post. Did I mention that you should READ?
I’m sorry if I’m annoying you. I’m really not trying to. I’m just trying to get to the bottom of your experience before I shell out a few hundred bucks on a collection of routers.
IMHO this point was left a little ambiguous in the article and I’m just trying to clarify after reading.
This is in your “Notes on AIMesh” section for the AX11000:
Recommended nodes:
Wireless: Tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers of the same tier, namely itself or the RT-AX92U. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band works as the dedicated backhaul.
Wired: Any Wi-Fi 5 or Wi-Fi 6 (dual-band) routers. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band is available only at tri-band nodes.
AiMesh 2.0 support: Yes (including system-wide Guest network) starting with firmware version 3.0.0.4.386.41712.
Nodes I’ve used: RT-AX92U, RT-AX88U, RT-AX86U, RT-AX58U, ZenWiFi AX XT8, ZenWiFi XD4 (wired back), Lyra (wired), RT-AC86U (wired), RT-AC88U (wired), Blue Cave (wired).
You mention that you tested the AX11000 with the XT8 in “Nodes I’ve used,” but you only *recommend* using the AX92U or another AX11000 as a wireless node.
My questions are arising from a careful reading of your words, not from a lack of reading.
I got it!!! That part was meant to include single routers. At the time, there were only two. The XT8, when I tested it, was only available as part of a 2-pack, and I added it later as I updated the post. I can see why it can get confusing there. I should have updated the wording… and will do that later.
Hey would love to get your recommendation. I currently run an AC86U as my main router (with a VPN) and a Google Wifi Mesh system as a double NAT. I want to do away with the Double NAT and upgrade my system with a few new ASUS routers to use AIMesh.
If money were no object, which of the above would you recommend to buy as a main router and 2 nodes? I need to run Merlin on the main router (Going to use the YazFi script to allow VPN filtering by SSID so family members can choose to use or not use the VPN easily). Is there any benefit to the AX11000 in terms of range (or anything else non-gaming related)? Or if we’re not gamers, is the AX88U or AX86U an equivalent replacement? And then for the nodes, 3 will be backhauled with Ethernet and will probably need to backhaul another one with Wifi. For one of these, I’ll use the current AC86U that I have. What do you recommend for the others?
THanks so much!
Check this post again and make sure you read the other AiMesh post mentioned at the beginning, Ira.
Thanks, Dong. Just went through both posts. Quick follow up – why don’t you recommend using ZenWifi XT8s as nodes (both wirelessly and via ethernet) with an AX11000 as main router?
Read this post again, and the review of the XT8, Ira. And I mean read them, don’t “go through”!
Hey I really don’t mean to be a pain. I did read. Let me sharpen my question.
You wrote above regarding recommended nodes using the AX11000 as the main router: “Wireless: Tri-band Wi-Fi 6 routers of the same tier, namely itself or the RT-AX92U. In this case, the 5GHz-2 band works as the dedicated backhaul.”
You mention later in that section that you have connected to the AX11000 with an XT8 in AIMesh, but it’s not in your “recommended” section.
According to your information, though, using the AX92U as a mesh with wireless backhaul will allow wireless clients a ceiling speed of 867 Mbps. (As per your ax92u review).
According to your XT8 review, in a wireless mesh set up, WiFi 6 clients can get up to 1200 Mbps.
So based on your info, the XT8 should be more recommended than the AX92U , so I guess what I’m asking is why don’t you recommend it? Is the XT8 truly not in the “same tier” as the AX11000 as you imply or was this just an oversight?
Hi Ira,
I also wrote that generally, you don’t want to use tri-band in a wired setup. If you read the XT8 review, I’d note that also said that it could have an issue win a wired setup.
Don’t pick and choose. Read the whole thing, follow the related links. Also, it’s about nuances.
Ty for having such in-depth writeups.
Chanced upon the website while searching for a specific requirement. I am moving away from the Orbi 854 since their latest firmware has turned it into a disaster.
A friend suggested i should check out Asus, and having had a good time with them in the past, i decided to get the XT8s (two sets). While doing so it did not occur to me to check, if the second set would even function as nodes. Thankfully your review clearly mentioned that they do putting my mind at ease.
Thanks
Sure, Jay. Glad you figured that out. 🙂
Hello Dong,
I currently have two RT-AC68U routers but one has died. Thinking about upgrading to Wi-Fi6 but not sure if I need to. My home is around 2400sq ft. I was thinking either getting the RT-AC86U or the RT-AX68U to pair with my existing router. Which would you recommend?
Check out this post, Dirk.
Dong,
Thank you for the great information! I have an Asus RT-AC66U (not B1) and just discovered it wont work as a node for the RT-AX88U I just ordered since it is not a B1 model. Also seems like it might not be best to pair anyway from your articles. I had been planning to hold out for a 2.5G+ LAN router but the wireless issues have been bugging me lately so I am ready for mesh.
I have a 2200 Sq ft house including an FROG and back yard to cover (FROG Router currently covers yard). Existing AP in living room covers 90% downstairs. When Router was downstairs it covered better but I moved to be by my Gaming PC. All APs wired. Devices hang between APs sometimes when in between them.
Now I need to decide from a few options. After reading your advice so far I have a few options I am considering and would appreciate your recommendation.
1. Use RT-AX88U as router and FROG AP, existing RT-AC66U in AP mode downstairs (same SSID?).
2. Purchase RP-AX56 for downstairs in Mesh mode.
3. Purchase RT-AC86U for downstairs in Mesh mode (a little better coverage/speed?).
4. Add AX1800 XD4 or return RT-AX88U and use XD4 with existing Router.
TIA
Tom
Your options don’t seem exclusive, Tom. That said, I’d go with #1, and/or #2, and/or #3. In any case, you’ve got the right assessment. Just get the hardware that fits your need. The APs option will work out but not ideal, you can try that out first.
Appreciate the quick response, I think I will try #1 first before buying additional equipment. If I dont get good results then I will go for #2 or #3.
You have been a great help, thanks again!
Dong,
I setup the new RT-AX88U, transferred my config from old router and changed RT-AC66U to AP mode and put it downstairs. So far everything is working great, full coverage around house, phones, tablets and laptops have no issue going between rooms!
Thanks again for the advice!
Good job, Tom. Congrats! 👍
Hi Dong,
Will the RT-AX86U AiMesh pair or the AX3000 AiMesh pair be faster than the XD6 or XT8, assuming all of them on wired backhaul?
And which is the fastest AiMesh pair you’ve tested for Wifi 6?
Thanks,
Richard
They will be the same if you use a wired backhaul, Richard. You can check their reviews and use the router charts as their mesh speeds. Via the wired backhaul, the satellite will deliver the same numbers.
The fastest would be a combo of the RT-AX89X (router) and a few RT-AX86U units (satellites) and a Multi-Gig switch in the middle. That’s what I’ve been using. More in this post.
Hi Dong,
I’d like to set up my house with a pair of Asus XD6s, wired backhaul. However, my only service provider option is 4G/LTE. Currently, I’m using a TP-Link Archer MR400 4G router.
What is the best way to connect 4G/LTE into a XD6 mesh? Should I just use my TP-Link router as a 4G modem (with all of its WiFi, router, DHCP, etc. features turned off) or should I instead consider the 4G-AC68U for the modem and router and some other Asus router as the node? Or something else?
I’d like a relatively future proof WiFi6 AiMesh setup with Parental Controls.
Thanks,
Erik
I just realized that the 4G-AC68U is not WiFi6 so that is out. I guess I could just continue to use the TP-Link or maybe the Asus 4G-N12 B1 as the modem.
I think I should simplify my question as I now see that my current TP-Link MR400 router is not able to just pass on the 4G connection without it being a router, too. At least that is my understanding.
Dong, if that is the case, can you suggest a 4G modem to be used with the Asus XD6 mesh? Or am I on the wrong track completely?
Thank you,
Erik
I wrote a detailed post for your specific situation, Erik. Check it out. By the way, it looks like you tend to ask fragmented questions whenever one pops in mind — it’d be best if you read the entire post with attention (and follow related links). You’ll figure it out. 🙂