TP-Link’s Deco 7 Pro BE63, also known as Deco 7 Pro BE11000, is a mid-tier Wi-Fi 7 mesh system formerly known as the Deco 63. As if that’s confusing enough, it’s also available as the Deco BE65 Pro at some retailers, such as Best Buy, and then the outdoor version is the Deco 7 BE65 Outdoor.
All of these variants share the common tri-band BE10000 hardware specs. Other than that, they are essentially the lower-tier version of the flagship Deco 7 Elite BE85 (formerly, Deco BE85), which is tri-band BE22000 hardware.
As I have already done the in-depth review of the Deco 7 Elite BE85. This preview will help you understand how this lesser alternative compares to its higher-end older cousin. After all, as Decos, they are very similar.
The quick takeaway is that, at the current friendly price of just $500 for a 3-pack (often with deep discounts), the Deco 7 Pro BE63 (and all its variants) make a sensible fit for many homes, as long as you’re OK with an app-controlled mesh system.
Dong’s note: I first published this post on March 29, 2024, and updated it on February 2, 2026, with the latest information.
TP-Link Deco 7 Pro BE63: An entry-level multi-gigabit purpose-built mesh system
Like the Deco BE85, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 is a mesh system that includes identical routers with no additional band for backhauling. Each shares the same tube design but is smaller.
Still, it has the same number of ports, including four 2.5Gbps Multi-Gig auto-sensing WAN/LAN ports and a USB 3.0 port. Compared to the higher-end version, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 has no 10Gbps ports and doesn’t support SFP+, which is a minor point.
The table below shows the similarities and differences between the two.
TP-Link Deco BE63 vs. Deco BE85: Hardware specifications
As you will note, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 has less than half the Wi-Fi bandwidth of the Deco BE85, which makes its lack of support for 10Gbps Multi-Gig understandable—chances are its real-world rates won’t be much faster than 2.5Gbps anyway.
 |  | |
| Full Name | TP-Link Deco 7 Pro BE63 BE10000 Tri-Band Mesh Router | TP-Link Deco 7 Elite BE85 BE22000 Tri-Band Mesh Router |
| Model | Deco 7 Pro BE63, Deco 7 Pro BE11000, Deco B63, Deco BE65 Pro | Deco BE85, Deco 7 Elite BE85 |
| Mesh Availability | 3-pack, 2-pack, or signle router | |
| Dimensions (each unit) | 4.23 × 4.23 × 6.93 in (107.5 × 107.5 × 176 mm) | 5.04 × 5.04 × 9.29 in (128 × 128 × 236 mm) |
| Processor | Undisclosed | |
| Wi-Fi Bandwidth | Tri-band BE10000 | Tri-Band BE22000 |
| 2.4GHz Band specs (channel width) | 2×2 AX: Up to 574Mbps (20/40MHz) | 4×4 BE: Up to 1376 Mbps (20/40MHz) |
| 5GHz Band Specs (channel width) | 2×2 BE: Up to 4324 Mbps (20/40/160/240MHz) | 4×4 BE: Up to 8640 Mbps (20/40/160/240MHz) |
| 6GHz Band Specs (channel width) | 2×2 BE: Up to 5188 Mbps (20/40/160/320MHz) | 4×4 BE: Up to 11520 Mbps (20/40/160/320MHz) |
| Backward Compatibility | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi | |
| Wireless Security | WPA2, WPA3 | |
| Mobile App | TP-Link Deco | |
| Web User Interface | Limited | |
| Bridge Mode | No | |
| AP Mode | Yes (as a mesh or a single unit) | |
| USB Port | 1x USB 3.0 | |
| Internal Fan | No | Yes |
| Gigabit Port (WAN/LAN auto-sensing) | None | |
| Multi-Gig Port (WAN/LAN auto-sensing) | 4x 2.5Gbps (Deco BE63 or Deco Pro BE63) 3x 2.5Gbps (Deco BE65 Pro) | 2x 2.5Gbps 1x 10Gbps 1x 10Gbps / SFP+ Combo |
| Link Aggregation | None | |
| Firmware Version (at review) | Not yet tested | 1.0.14 Build 20231124 Rel. 32537 |
| Power Input | 110-240V | |
| Power Consumption (per 24 hours) | Not yet tested | ≈ 485 Wh (router unit) |
| Retail Price (at publication) | $599.99 (3-pack) $349.99 (2-pack) $199.99 (single unit) $299.99 (outdoor unit) | $1199.99 (3-pack) $799.99 (2-pack) $499.99 (single unit) |
A Wi-Fi 7 Deco variant
As part of the Deco family, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 shares the same feature set and management app as other Wi-Fi 7 Deco sets.
Specifically, you’re required to sign in with a TP-Link account and use the Deco mobile app as the only way to set up and handle the hardware. As a result, a live Internet connection is required for the setup process and ongoing management.
Additionally, managing your home router via a vendor-connected account increases inherent privacy risk.
TP-Link and your privacy
Signing in with a vendor-linked online account generally means your hardware connects to the vendor at all times, which translates into inherent privacy risks.
On this matter, the China-origin company, among other things, insists that it’s a “global multinational group” and offers this assurance:
“TP-Link takes privacy seriously and complies with U.S. policies to protect consumers.”
TP-Link’s Privacy Policy page.
Managing your home network via a third party is never a good idea. Privacy is a matter of degree. Data collection and handling vary vendor by vendor and region by region.
Other than that, in terms of Wi-Fi, you can expect the following:
- A primary SSID (network name) for the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands via Smart Connect. A couple of things to note about this network:
- You can’t split these bands into two SSIDs, but you can turn off either band, making the network exclusively 2.4GHz or 5GHz.
- There is an option to set the 5GHz band to 80MHz, 160MHz (default), or the new 240MHz channel width.
- A second SSID for the 6GHz band—automatically takes the primary SSID’s name and adds the “-6GHz” suffix. You can change this name to anything you want, including the same as the primary SSID. (This is new since the Deco XE200 doesn’t allow the 6GHz to share the same SSID name as the others.)
- An optional third SSID with Wi-Fi 7’s Multi-Link Operation (MLO) feature. This SSID automatically has the “_MLO” suffix, but you can also name it to your liking. A couple of things to note:
- This SSID uses all three bands by default, but you can turn off the 2.4GHz band and use only the 5GHz and 6GHz bands.
- Wi-Fi 7 clients can connect to this SSID using two bands simultaneously to increase the bandwidth. Wi-Fi 6 devices can only use one band at a time.
- This SSID only supports WPA3 encryption, which generally doesn’t work with Wi-Fi 5 and older clients.
- Two optional Guest Network SSIDs, one for the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands and the other for the 6GHz band. You can also name these networks to your liking as long as they are different from those used in #1, #2, or #3.
- An optional IoT Network SSID for the 2.4GHz band (default) or the 2.4GHz + 5GHz combo, which is a virtual SSID within the primary network for low-bandwidth smart devices.
As usual, users can choose whether to have the SSIDs broadcast (default) or hidden from the public.
As for the hardware, if you get a 2- or 3-pack, the units in the same set will be pre-synced—just pick one as the primary router, and the rest will work as satellites when plugged in. However, you can easily add more units to an existing setup. Generally, for a Wi-Fi 7 system, it’s best to use the same hardware units for a fully wireless setup, as that’s the only way to have the MLO feature in the backhaul link.
Additionally, considering the four 2.5Gbps ports, you can get a wired system with multi-gigabit backhauling right out of the box without getting a switch.
New to the idea of backhaul? Open this cabinet
When you use multiple Wi-Fi access points—in a mesh Wi-Fi system or a combo of a Wi-Fi router and an extender—there are two types of connections: fronthaul and backhaul.
Fronthaul is the Wi-Fi signals broadcast outward for clients or the local area network (LAN) ports for wired devices. It’s what we generally expect from a Wi-Fi broadcaster.
Backhaul (a.k.a. backbone), on the other hand, is the link between a Wi-Fi satellite unit and the network’s primary router, or between satellite units.
This link works behind the scenes to keep the hardware units together as a system. It also determines the ceiling bandwidth (and speed) of all devices connected to the particular Wi-Fi satellite unit.
At the satellite/extender unit, the connection used for the backhaul—a Wi-Fi link (wireless) or a network port (wired)—is often called the uplink. In a wireless uplink, keep the following in mind:
- Hardware of Wi-Fi 6e, Wi-Fi 6, or Wi-Fi 5 standards uses one of its bands (2.4GHz, 5GHz, or 6GHz) for the uplink. In this case:
- When a Wi-Fi band handles backhaul and fronthaul simultaneously, only half its bandwidth is available to either end.
- When a Wi-Fi band functions solely for backhauling, often available traditional Tri-band hardware, it’s called the dedicated backhaul.
- Most Wi-Fi 7 satellite units can use multiple bands for the backhaul link thanks to the MLO feature.
For the best performance and reliability, network cables are recommended for backhauling—wired backhauling, which is an advantage of mesh Wi-Fi hardware with network ports. In this case, a Wi-Fi satellite unit can use its entire Wi-Fi bandwidth for the fronthaul.
Besides that, like other Decos, the BE63 has a standard set of networking settings, including Dynamic DNS (with a free domain from TP-Link), port forwarding, VPN (server or client), IPTV VLAN tagging (required by certain Internet providers), and the ability to work in the AP mode (as a single router or a mesh system.)
Basically, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 does the same thing as the Deco 7 Elite BE85 and other Wi-Fi 7 Decos. The only noticeable difference is in performance.
TP-Link Deco 7 Pro BE63: Entry-level multi-gigabit performance
As mentioned, I haven’t tested the Deco 7 Pro BE63, but its performance will likely be limited by its 2.5Gbps network ports—and that’s plenty fast in most cases, as most homes don’t have faster-than-Gigabit broadband connections.
In fact, for a home with slower-than-2.5Gbps broadband—Gigabit or Gig+—the Deco 7 Pro BE63 will deliver the same performance as higher-end, more expensive hardware, such as the Deco 7 Elite BE85 or BE95.
Tip
Gig+, or Gig Plus, denotes a speed grade between 1Gbps and 2Gbps. So, it’s 1.5Gbps, give or take a couple of hundred megabits per second, and it’s not speedy enough to qualify as Multi-Gig Ethernet or multi-Gigabit. Intel coined the term to describe its Wi-Fi 6E client chips, the AX210 and AX211, in terms of their real-world speeds.
Gig+ primarily applies to sustained Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 speeds via a 2×2 at 160MHz connection, or to broadband internet speeds.
However, if you want the fastest possible local bandwidth, especially in a wired backhauling setup, the Deco 7 Pro BE63 is decidedly inferior to higher-end hardware.
TP-Link Deco 7 Pro BE63's PRELIMINARY Assessment
Pros
Four 2.5Gbps Multi-Gig ports, multi-Gigabit wired backhauling out of the box
Wi-Fi 7 support, backward compatible with existing clients; excellent overall real-world performance;
Easy to use; fanless
Cons
No 10Gbps ports or SFP+ support; mid-tier Wi-Fi 7 specs
Vendor-connected mobile app required; HomeShield Pro costs extra
Conclusion
The TP-Link Deco 7 Pro BE63 BE10000 Tri-Band Wi-Fi 7 mesh system—a.k.a. the Deco BE65 Pro, depending on where you are—is not meant to be the greatest and greatest. It’s not to replace the top-tier Deco 7 Elite BE85.
However, with four 2.5Gbps network ports and multi-Gigabit-capable Wi-Fi specs, it’s still an excellent Wi-Fi solution for most homes, especially those with 2Gbps or slower broadband, already wired with network cables. At $500 for a 3-pack, it’s definitely worth the consideration. Check it out today.
Hi Dong – As mentioned in a separate post, I’m currently comparing the be63 to the be85 (bought both 3 packs) and, as you hypothesized, the speed clocks the same with my 1 gig internet. But as a consumer who only knows so much, what other factors that I’m not taking account (if any) might give the edge to the be85s? For example, I keep hearing about the bandwidth difference (10,000 vs 22,000) but have no idea how numbers like that might affect real world situations like managing over 100 devices or the lag in my son’s PlayStation! Basically I’m happy to pay the more than twice the difference pricetag if there are advantages beyond mere speed but don’t want to waste my money if it doesn’t. Any sage wisdom welcome!
Hi Marc,
I can’t give you specifics since I’ve never been at your place. Imagine you listen to my advice and then didn’t what you expect. Details matter and I can’t pretend I know what’s what simply by hearing you expressing what you want. That said, I can only point you in the right direction. You need to make an educated decision and be responsible for that yourself.
1. Here’s what those number means. Here’s what MLO means.
2. If you really want and advanced network I’d stay away from Deco (not to mentioned TP-Link might get banned in the US).
3. For the best expreince, you need to run network cables and use that to link your devices. You can’t avoid lag when using wireless backhauling.
4. For that many devices, I’d recommend UniFi or ASUS.
Generally, understanding how stuff work and setting the correct expectation is the key.
Good luck!
Hey Dong, I’ve got a small question regarding Tp-link Decos, this model in particular… Tp-link proudly lists throughout their marketing material support for VLAN tagging. Mostly it’s around IPTV, so I wonder if it offers solely VLAN tags in on the WAN port split into specific LAN side ports each with dedicated VLAN for either regular Internet or IPTV VLAN, same as most products on the market do, or if it is a full LAN side VLANs tagging and trunking as well… Then again in the mesh set-up, can you put main unit at WAN entry point, the 2nd mesh unit near where multimedia/TV device is placed, connect them over wire and/or using wireless backhaul, and have that IPTV VLAN tagged traffic configured to be going through a port on the satellite, not one on the main router unit? Or does it only allow IPTV traffic be assigned to a port on the main router unit and you need to wire it up from said main unit to target consumer device?
I’ve never used this feature, Marcin, but generally, tagging is based on the IP address and not a port. So you can tag any devices within the network.
Hey Dong, agree with you its almost impossible to test out all TP link routers but would like to check if you are aware ISP are now starting to offer similar variant but branded as Aginet instead of Deco. An example is Deco BE85 vs Aginet BE22000 which essentially is the same router but backend system seems to differ. Wonder if you have any views on deco vs aginet system?
They are the same thing with the latter being a variant made for ISP. That’s partly why the US is considering banning TP-Link altogether for flooding the market.
Hi Dong,
Thank you for providing real world testing data and detailed information about all these routers. It is so helpful in a market that is saturated with misleading claims. I’ve been experimenting with many routers in my apt home (1 gig fiber). I am currently testing this router against the Netgear RAXE300 (which is enormous in size), but I am curious, if you just have an apt home less than 1000 sq feet (and using only one router), would the TP-Link BE9300 be a better choice? Both TP links seem similar, but perhaps if you’re only using one unit, the Deco BE63 is not as good as standalone?
I’d go with the Archer router in this case because it give you more option in terms of management, Jackson. Specifically, among other things, you can use the web interface and keep your privacy intact. You don’t have that option with the app-operated Deco. Along that line, an Asus router will give you even more. Good luck!
I am looking at the Deco BE65 (in UK). Can you clarify, if there is no dedicated wireless backhaul and you rely on WBH this uses the 6Ghz band? If so – what happens to your wifi 6e/7 performance?
Can you achieve efficient Wifi 6e/7 performance without a wired backhaul? Thanks
More on how a Deco handle it’s band in this post, David. As for efficiency, this post on how to set up a mesh system will help. Good luck!
Hey Dong,
I know you said you will probably not review the BE63, but I think it would be really interesting to see the differnce the 2×2 vs 4×4 Bands make, especially for a wireless backhaul.
My use case is a bit weird, I will have wired backhaul between the main Router and 1 Satellite and then wireless backhaul between the 1st and 2nd Satellites and want to know if the difference in Band Specs (2×2 vs 4×4) makes much of a difference on the last jump.
If you donate the fund to buy the hardware, I’ll review it, Tani. We have a budget. Otherwise, more on mesh in this post. Of course there’s big difference between 2×2 and 4×4.
Haha thats fair enough.
Do you think realistically for my use case with gigabit internet on the last hop (about 10 metres with line of sight) it is going to be a huge difference? The devices will be connected by ethernet to the last satellite.
Just worried about it losing a lot of speed going from the 1st to the 2nd satellite. And since its over double the cost for the BE85 in the UK.
No, it likely won’t make a huge difference. If you a top-tier client, chances are you still get your Internet speed in full, or almost full. Good luck!
Hi Dong, are you aware of the latest TP-Link Deco HB710? Any reviews on that model?
No and no, Teck, the compnay has been making lots and lots of pointless variants, it’s impossible to keep up with. I’m sure it’s another variant of an existing set.
Hi Dong. Really helpful!
Do you think I would benefit from the deco BE85 if I have a 1 Gb fiber optic plan or will not see the difference and would be OK with the BE 63?
Also… why did you put fanless as a pro of the BE 63? Thought that a fan would help prevent overheating and lagging.
Thanks again for all that useful information.
No you wouldn’t since the BE63 has 2.5Gpps which is much faster than you need, Mats. No fan means no noise and no chance of having something that might break over time. Many high-end hardware (you’ll see) doesn’t need fans thanks to better thermal control. The case of the BE63, it’s mid-tier hardware that doesn’t produce lots of heat. Still, no fan is a plus.
Thank you for answering so quicky.
By any chance… do you know if it is compatible with fiber optic internet providers?
They all are, or not. More here.
Thanks Dong!
I have a last question… if I have a one floor 3000 sq feet house, would i benefit from 2 or 3 bodies?
I actually own a regular tp link router AX3000 and despite being in the middle of the house, signal does not go to the corners (where the bedrooms are unfortunately)… my guess is the walls given that all the rooms are on the first floor.
“No fan means (…) no chance of having something that might break over time”
I agree: I’ve had to replace a BE85 due to fans that became faulty after 3 months, leading to WiFi shutdowns
Thanks for your Quick Take article on the Deco BE63. It sounds like it’s a pretty solid and affordable mesh system. One thing I wasn’t aware of is that the BE63, and even the BE85, don’t support Link Aggregation or have a dedicated band for wireless backhaul—which are not deal breakers for me as I’ll likely be using a wired backhaul setup.
That said, I’ve narrowed my choice to either the Deco BE63 or the forthcoming Asus BQ16, the latter of which seems to have better specs. Where do you think the BQ16 (non-pro) version will fall price-wise, and is there any downside to only having two mesh units versus three in a 3,700 SF 2-story house?
Thanks again, Dong!
No Deco support LG or Dual-WAN, Kelly. For that you need the Archer lineup, or go with Asus.
Thanks, Dong. I hadn’t considered Archer. Is there a specific model you like? Also, any word on the Asus release?
Archer is TP-Link’s lineup for standalone routers. I don’t have updates on the Asus. We just have to wait and see.