Those are crazy prices, but not for reasons you might think! And many of you have asked me when I’d publish my review on it. Well, the quick answer is probably never.
What you’re reading right now, despite the in-depth analysis, is not a review in my standard since there’s no real-world hands-on testing involved.
Despite having reviewed the eero Pro 6 and eero 6 (plus most of the rest of the older variants in my past life), I’ll likely take a pass on this one.
This post will explain briefly why and offer my quick, no-nonsense take on the new device.
Dong’s note: I have updated this piece since its published date above to clarify the wording on Wi-Fi intricacies without changing my original assessment. This post is not an in-depth review of the eero Pro 6E. Rather, it explains why the router will not be reviewed on this website.
Table of Contents
eero Pro 6E: Another data mining Wi-Fi machine of low-end hardware
I had a lot of hesitation testing the previous eero variants, to tell the truth.
Generally, all variants of a brand of purpose-built mesh Wi-Fi systems — eero, Linksys Velop, Netgear Orbi, TP-Link Deco, etc. — share the same firmware.
Consequently, despite the possible differences in physical sizes and hardware capabilities, they have a common mobile app, user requirements, and feature set.
In other words, they are the same in principle with minor variations in capacities. This article on popular canned Wi-Fi systems explains the main differences between major brands.
Generally, it’s never fun to work with devices designed to collect user data. And among those, the eero is by far the worst, in my opinion.
My testing always includes real-world experience where I use the product extensively in my own home with my family. Consequently, I don’t feel comfortable plugging something in that doesn’t give me control — at least to some extent — over what it does.
And the eero gives users no control at all — you can’t even set it up or make any changes without first going through the vendor. The device won’t even initiate without having a live connection to eero — the company.
Privacy is a matter of degree. While many networking vendors use a similar approach to router management, which is always not a good thing, they do so to a certain level. Most importantly, these are relatively small networking companies.
On the other hand, Amazon is a giant data-hungry company that touches many aspects of modern life. And that makes the eero scary. If you don’t feel that way, that’s because ignorance is bliss.
That expected hype
If not already, you’ll soon run into “reviews” on the eero Pro 6E (and eero 6+). Many will sing their praises by practically repeating eero’s marketing.
In my experience, eero tends to overwhelm journalists with false but cool-sounding information. Those with limited networking know-how will easily cave in. On top of that Amazon has lots of influence, and there are generally more incentives for folks to hype it up than otherwise.
If you evaluate the eero’s favorably, among other things, your work will be promoted and used by its “fans” as evidence of how wonderful it is, across social media — it’s a win-win.
So, it’s kinda foolish not to do so. But all legit reviewers I know do not use the eero for themselves at home.
In any case, I’m nobody to judge. I’m myself an Amazon associate, meaning if you buy the eeros over the links above, I might get a small commission. I’d hope so anyway. We all have mouths to feed.
To be fair, there are impressive things about the eero Pro 6E. The cute, compact design, the integration of home automation wireless standards, and the general ease of use have their allure.
So, if you’ve been in the ecosystem and waiting for an upgrade, you understandably get excited. The new mesh router is far from completely useless.
But if you think the new eero Pro 6E is decidedly better than the previous Pro 6, you’re fooling yourself, or you just (want to) believe in the marketing nonsense.
Wi-Fi is invisible and, therefore, an area where vendors can easily sprinkle in nonsensical snazzy tech terms that are about as true as voodoo and magic. Real-world performance is always adversely different from things on paper and what you hear, even greatly so.
After thoroughly testing virtually all other Wi-Fi 6E broadcasters available on the US market, I can say the eero Pro 6E is no good, at least in terms of performance, just by looking at its hardware specs.
So let’s check them out.
eero Pro 6E vs eero Pro 6: Hardware specifications
eero didn’t reveal the details of the eero Pro 6E’s specs on its website.
But from what I could glean (and extrapolate from the information provided), it’s clear that the Pro 6E is a “weaker” Wi-Fi machine than the previous model, which is already entry-level hardware. In fact, it’s the lowest compared to all other Wi-Fi 6E hardware I’ve tested.
In any case, the eero Pro 6 and Pro 6E share almost identical designs.
|Full Name||eero Pro 6 |
Wi-Fi 6 Mesh Router
|eero Pro 6E |
Wi-Fi 6E Mesh Router
|Model||eero Pro 6||eero 6 Pro 6E|
|Wi-Fi Designation||Dual-band AX4200||Tri-band AXE5400 (?)|
|Dimensions||5.3 x 5.3 x 2.1 in |
(13.5 x 13.5 x 5.3 cm)
|5.5 x 5.5 x 2.2 in|
(13.9 x 13.9 x 5.5 cm)
|Weight||1.49 lbs (676 g)||1.55 lbs (703 g)|
|1st Band||2.4GHz AX: Up to 600Mbps|
|2.4GHz AX: Up to 600Mbps|
|2st Band||5GHz 4×4 AX: Up to 2400Mbps |
|5GHz 2×2 AX: Up to 2400Mbps|
|3rd Band||5GHz 2×2 AX: Up to 1201 Mbps|
|6GHz 2×2 AXE: Up to 2400Mbps|
|Possible Dedicated Backhaul Band||5GHz||None|
|Wired Backhaul Support||Yes||Yes|
|Wi-Fi Security||WPA2, WPA2/WPA3||WPA2, WPA2/WPA3|
|Web User Interface||None||None|
|AP (Bridge) Mode||Yes||Yes|
|USB Port||USB-C (power)||USB-C (power)|
|Gigabit Port||2x Auto-Sensing (LAN/WAN)||1x Auto-Sensing|
|Multi-Gig Port||None||1x 2.5Gbps Auto-Sensing|
|Processing Power||1.4 GHz quad-core CPU, |
1GB RAM, 4GB flash
|1 GHz dual-core CPU, |
1 GB RAM, 4 GB flash storage
eero Pro 6E vs eero Pro 6: Another misleading case of the old tri-band vs new tri-band
The new eero Pro 6E has consistent mid-tier 2×2 Wi-Fi specs. Its ceiling Wi-Fi speed will likely cap at 1.2Gbps on the 5GHz band, making the real-world speed significantly below Gigabit.
While the router’s 5GHz is supposedly capable of 2400Mbps, you can’t expect it to use the 160MHz bandwidth at all times. And the vendor itself says that the router delivers up to 1.3Gbps of Wi-Fi bandwidth.
eero Pro 6E: (Maybe) better as a single router
So, the eero Pro 6E is only better than the eero Pro 6 when working as a single router, and in only one small area: its support for Wi-Fi 6E devices via the new 6GHz band — the Pro 6 doesn’t have this band.
The Pro 6E does have a 2.5Gbps port, but in most, if not all, cases, that’d make no difference since there’s no way for any device to connect at that speed on the front end — even when using the 6GHz band you’ll only get Gig+ sustained speed at best.
What is Gig+
Gig+, or Gig plus, conveys a speed grade faster than 1Gbps but slower than 2Gbps. So, it’s 1.5Gbps, give or take, and it’s not fast enough to be qualified as Multi-Gig.
Gig+ generally applies to the sustained speeds of Wi-Fi 6 or 6E (via a 2×2 at 160MHz connection) or Internet speed, not wired local connections.
The only time this port is meaningful is if you have 2.5Gbps Internet but in that case, you shouldn’t get this router, or any entry-level hardware if you want to enjoy ultra-fast broadband.
Nonetheless, eero uses this port to prop up the Pro 6E with the “fastest eero to date” marketing nonsense. The 2.5Gpbs port is nothing new. There are some two dozen Multi-Gig Wi-Fi 6/E home routers that have this port or faster, all with better specs than the eero Pro 6E. And I’ve thoroughly tested all of them.
In a mesh setup, things will get complicated.
Extra: The case of multiple Wi-Fi broadcasters
This portion of extra content is part of the explainer post on mesh systems.
A Wi-Fi connection between two direct parties occurs in a single band, using one fixed channel, at any given time. This principle applies to all existing Wi-Fi standards, at least up to Wi-Fi 6E.
Fronthaul is the Wi-Fi signals broadcast outward for clients or the network ports for wired devices. It’s what we generally expect from a Wi-Fi broadcaster.
Backhaul (a.k.a backbone,) on the other hand, is the link between one satellite broadcaster and another, which can be the network’s primary router, a switch, or another satellite unit.
This link works behind the scene to keep the hardware units together as a system. It also determines the ceiling bandwidth (and speed) of all devices connected to the particular broadcaster.
The connection type, a Wi-Fi band or a network port, used for the backhaul is often referred to as the uplink. A Wi-Fi broadcaster might use one of its bands (2.4GHz, 5GHz, or 6GHz) or a network port for the uplink.
When a Wi-Fi band handles backhaul and fronthaul simultaneously, only half of its bandwidth is available to either end. From the perspective of a connected client, that phenomenon is called signal loss.
When a Wi-Fi band functions solely for backhauling, it’s called the dedicated backhaul.
In a mesh system, only traditional Tri-band hardware — those with an additional 5GHz band — can have a dedicated backhaul band without ostracizing clients of the same band.
Generally, it’s best to use a network cable for backhauling — wired backhauling. And that’s an advantage of mesh hardware with network ports. In this case, a satellite broadcaster can use its entire Wi-Fi bandwidth for front-hauling.
In networking, network cables are always much better than wireless in speed and reliability.
eero Pro 6E: Decidedly worse as a wireless mesh
The old eero Pro 6 is a traditional Tri-band device — it can dedicate one of its two 5GHz bands as the backhaul in a fully wireless setup. Specifically, in most cases, it’ll dynamically use one of its two 5GHz bands solely for the backhaul link and the other 5GHz for the fronthaul.
On the other hand, the eero Pro 6E is a new Tri-band router — it needs all three bands to serve clients.
Now we have two scenarios: using the eero Pro 6E mesh in a place with mixed clients of all standards or in a place with only 5GHz (or 6GHz) clients.
eero Pro 6E mesh in a mixed environment (common)
In a mixed environment where you have clients of all three bands (6GHz, 5GHz, and 2.4GHz), whichever band the eero Pro 6E uses for backhauling will suffer signal loss.
This reduced backhaul speed will then be that of the entire mesh system — all devices connected to the satellite unit will share the backhaul’s bandwidth.
eero Pro 6E mesh in a 5GHz-only or 6GHz-only environment (rare)
The second is where you have only 6GHz or 5GHz clients — the 2.4GHz is too slow to matter — and therefore, the system can use either the 5GHz or the 6GHz band solely as the backhaul, with the other functioning solely as the fronthaul.
In this case, the system’s clients’ speed will cap at that of the backhaul band or the fronthaul band, whichever is slower. Per the specs, that’d be 1.2Gbps of theoretical speeds (2×2 Wi-Fi 6 at 80MHz). Expect the real-world speed to be well below 1Gbps — you likely get 500Mbps at best on a good day.
It’s important to note that the 6GHz band has a shorter range than the 5GHz (or the 2.4GHz). Consequently, we can’t count on it to work as a reliable backhaul — that’s consistently been the case in my experience. It’s the nature of this band.
In reality, depending on the environment, the eero Pro 6E will automatically pick the band with the strongest signal as the backhaul in real-time — that’s how dynamic backhaul works. And when it uses the 2.4GHz band for this job, the mesh will be super slow.
Again, keep in mind that a Wi-Fi connection between two direct devices takes place in a single band, using a fixed channel, at any given time. In other words, there’s no way to combine two bands in a connection.
Wi-Fi 7 might make things different on this front, but that remains to be seen.
The use of empty buzz words like “TrueMesh,” “Dynamic,” “parallel network,” etc., doesn’t change that fact. They are nonsensical terms cheaply propagated across social media to confuse or mislead impressionable users.
Wired backhaul is a must
In short, in a fully wireless setup, the eero Pro 6E will likely be slower than the eero Pro 6. And generally, there’s no scenario where it will be fast compared to all other existing Wi-Fi 6E solutions, considering its hardware specs.
While both the Pro 6 and Pro 6E can work via a wired backhaul, the latter needs this type of backhaul to work well. That’s the common case with any Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E mesh systems, including the higher-end ZenWiFi ET8 or Linksys AXE8400.
By the way, since there’s just one 2.5Gbps port per router, you can’t have Multi-Gig wired backhaul out of the eero Pro 6E mesh, like the case of the ZenWiFi Pro ET12. But that’s not a huge deal considering the router’s expected slow Wi-Fi speeds.
In the best-case scenario, an eero Pro 6E mesh will cap at Gigabit, which is its wired backhaul speed. In reality, expect significantly lower real-world wireless rates, most of the time and in a large part of the mesh network.
Like the eero Pro 6, the new eero Pro 6E is not what it’s cracked up to be by the vendor’s exceedingly misleading marketing ploys. And to make matter worse, it’s a Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E device that’s generally not ideal for a wireless mesh setup.
To those who just opened that fancy box, I don’t mean to rain on your parade. If you love the eero Pro 6E, go ahead and love it. I’m happy for you. And for a modest sub-Gigabit home network, chances are it’ll work out.
However, if you expect me to agree with the superlatives you’ve been fed about it, I can’t. How a router works is physics, not hype or wishful thinking.
At the core, the new eero Pro 6E is a low-end, entry-level Wi-Fi 6E device. It will likely be the slowest among its peers in real-world usage. So it’s outrageously over-priced, and the “Pro” notion is laughable.
The combo of insignificant hardware, misleading marketing, and the extreme level of privacy risks makes it apparent to me that the eero Pro 6E is not worth the time and effort I normally put into a review.
Like all eero variants, the Pro 6E is designed primarily to further enrich the vendor via data collection or subscription add-ons. As such, eero should give it to you for free. In any case, you don’t own it — literally, you can’t use it on your own.
The bottom line is I wouldn’t bother with the eero Pro 6E even if you paid me to use it. And the growing number of better Wi-Fi 6E options makes that decision a no-brainer.
But if I had to choose between the eero Pro 6 and Pro 6E for a wireless home, I’d go with the former.
There’s a way to use this eero Pro 6E, or any eero for that matter, without risking too much on the privacy front: use them in the AP (Bridge) mode as I mentioned in this post on the eero 6 vs eero Pro 6. Why you’d want to do that is another question entirely.
For more on how eero stacks up against other canned mesh systems, this post on popular mesh brands will give you an overview. In the meantime, check out the quick ratings below.
Amazon eero's Overall Rating
Easy to set up and use
Reliable and scalable Wi-Fi coverage
Middling hardware designed to collect user data, slow Wi-Fi speeds
Login account, live Internet connection to vendor required for setup and ongoing management,
Minimum ports, limited port-related features (no Dual-WAN, Link Aggregation, etc.)
Online Protection and Parental Control require a monthly subscription
Home automation feature requires Amazon integration
No web interface, spartan Wi-Fi, and network settings
Not sure which to pick between two other similar Wi-Fi solutions? Check them all out here!