In late December 2021, I realized that Netgear had been quietly and retrospectively removing major features from its existing Nighthawk and Orbi devices via firmware updates, effectively reducing the hardware’s capability.
I published this review before that time. Consequently, while the hands-on experience remains largely relevant, the rating or recommendation might no longer fully apply.
The 3-pack Netgear MK63 Nighthawk Dual-Band AX1800 Wi-Fi 6 Mesh System (or MK62 for a 2-pack) is, for now, a one-of-a-kind mesh system despite the fact it’s supposed to be a universal one.
Considering Netgear’s other well-known Orbi mesh family, it’s a bit hard for me to find the right place to put the MK63 at first. After all, it’s a dual-band system seemingly without anything new to offer.
But at just around $280 (or less than $200 for a 2-pack), the compact mesh system is quite enticing. And its reliable performance can quickly grow on you.
So here’s the bottom line: If you’re looking for a budget Wi-Fi 6 mesh system for a wired home or one with a modest Internet connection, the Netgear Nighthawk MK63 can be an excellent buy.
Just make sure you have a little patience for its potentially problematic initial setup process.
Table of Contents
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk: First Wi-Fi EasyMesh System
If you’re wondering why Netgear makes the MK63, you’re not alone, considering its well-known Orbi brand. The thing is, with this entirely new mesh, Netgear tries to achieve a couple of meaningful objectives it can’t do with the completely proprietary Orbi.
But first, let’s take a look at the MK63’s hardware.
A familiar mesh design
The Netgear MK63 includes two types of hardware: router (model MR60) and satellite (MS60). Similar to the case of any Orbi set, you can’t use these interchangeably. When you buy a 3-pack, you get one router and two satellites. A 2-pack (MK62) includes just one of each.
The MS60 satellite is also available as a single add-on unit. Netgear says you can use up to four MS60 units with an MR60 router for a total of five broadcasters in a system.
The two hardware units look the same from almost any angle. Each is a compact square box with shiny plastic chassis that’s a fingerprint super-magnet. Touch it once, and you can never make it look clean again.
On top, the box has little openings for ventilation. On the back, you’ll note that the router unit has one gigabit WAN port and one Gigabit LAN port. The satellite unit has one Gigabit LAN port to host a wired client or the wired backhaul link.
Again, the system supports wired backhaul, but considering the limited number of ports, you will need a switch in between if you want to use two or more satellite units. Specifically, you can connect just one satellite to the router, and that’s it. There’s no way to daisy-chain them with network cables.
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk’s detail photos
Why Netgear makes the MK63
Now, here’s the big picture behind the MK63. There are two things of note.
The first Nighthawk mesh system
First, with the new system, Netgear wants to bring a mesh option to its robust Nighthawk brand, which is often associated with performance and geared toward advanced users.
In this regard, the Netgear MK63 hits these notes:
- It shares the same familiar web interface and mobile app as existing Nighthawk routers, such as the RAX120, RAX200, or RAX50.
- By being super simple to use, probably even too much so, the new system makes the Nighthawk brand feel more user-friendly.
- Soon, there’s a chance the MS60 satellite (and alike) will work with existing Nighthawk routers. Considering everyone wants to turn their standalone routers into part of a mesh system — Like Linksys with its Velo Intelligent Mesh, Asus with the AiMesh, etc. — it only makes sense if Netgear decides to do the same. And that’s a good thing.
And secondly, this is the very first mesh system that’s designed based on the EasyMesh concept.
What is Wi-Fi EasyMesh
Wi-Fi EasyMesh is Wi-Fi Alliance’s new certification program, first announced early this year, that aims to simplify the building of mesh systems. The idea is any Wi-Fi EasyMesh-certified hardware from any vendor will work with one another to form a Wi-Fi mesh system.
For that to work out, we need to wait until more vendors participate. For now, the MK63 is only in this space. But starting in 2021, when the EasyMesh program gets certified, chances are we’ll see more supported hardware.
So why does Netgear want to be ahead of this game so badly? Well, that’s because the company has been introducing its own “universal” mesh-like add-on hardware that works well with (almost) any router.
Examples are the Nighthawk extenders that can replicate the Wi-Fi settings of any existing network, such as the EX8000 or EX7500. Considering the networking vendor is part of the Wi-Fi Alliance, it’s probably safe to say these Nighthawk extenders are how the concept of EasyMesh came to life.
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk: Pre-synced hardware, simple to use, spartan Wi-Fi settings
Out of the box, the MK63’s hardware is pre-synced. Thanks to that, the system can be straightforward to set up and use.
All you have to do is get the router unit up and running, the way you do any standard router with a web user interface, and then the satellites automatically become part of the system.
You only need to add them manually if you get additional add-on units. In that case, it’s quite easy to add them, too, using the web UI or the mobile app.
A bit of a setup hiccup
In my trial, though, I did run into some issues, mostly because my review hardware came with a problematic (pre-release?) firmware version.
Specifically, the router setup part went well. I accessed its web user interface by pointing a connected computer to its default IP, 192.168.1.1, and follows the wizard. In all, it took me less than 5 minutes.
(Alternatively, as an option, you can also use the Nighthawk mobile app for this process. In this case, you’ll need to have an account with Netgear. I always prefer the web user interface, however.)
I then checked for the satellites, but none appeared to be part of the system as expected. Instead, I saw a note that a new firmware is available. Thinking that updating the firmware only on the router might create issues. I ignored that and proceeded to add the satellites by following the onscreen step-by-step wizard manually.
The first satellite synced immediately. However, the second wouldn’t do, and I had to try for a long time via restarting, resetting, and so on before it finally hooked up.
Long story short, as it turned out, the satellite performed a self firmware update during my setup and was not available to the system. Unaware of that, I tried to “fix” it and made things worse. Good thing I didn’t brick it.
The whole experience reminded me of what I ran into while testing the Asus ZenWiFi AX Mini, which also shipped with a pre-release firmware version. And similarly, this was also the Netgear MK63’s only hiccup during my testing.
A note of caution for those getting the Netgear MK63
That said, if you get the MK63, make sure you set up the router unit, plug the satellites in around and wait for a while (like 10 – 15 minutes) for the auto firmware update process to finish before trying any troubleshooting.
Specifically, in my case, the firmware that worked is V220.127.116.11_2.0.42, and the one that had issues is V18.104.22.168_2.0.28.
Chances are yours might already come with the latest firmware. In that case, you can expect it to work smoothly. And the setup process, only necessary on the router unit, will take less than 5 minutes.
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk: Hardware specifications
|Unit Name||Nighthawk AX1800 |
Wi-Fi 6 Mesh Router
|Nighthawk AX1800 |
Mesh Wi-Fi 6 Satellite
|Dedicated Backhaul Band||None||None|
|Dimensions (WxDxH)||4.8 x 4.8 x 2.5 in |
(12.19 x 12.19 x 6.35 cm)
|Same as Router|
|Weight||0.63 lb (286 grams)||Same|
|5GHz Wi-Fi Specs||2 x 2 AX: Up to 1200 Mbps||Same|
|2.4GHz Wi-Fi Specs||2 x 2 Wi-Fi 6 up to 574 Mbps||Same|
|Wi-Fi Security||WPA3 / WPA2 / WPA||Same|
|Channel Width Support||20Mhz, 40MHz, 80MHz||Same|
|Mobile App||Netgear Nighthawk||n/a|
|Web User Interface||Yes (Full)||n/a|
|AP Mode||Yes (as a single unit or a mesh)||n/a|
|Gigabit Port||1x WAN/LAN, 1x LAN||1x LAN|
|Processing Power||Quad-Code 1.5GHz CPU, |
128MB Flash and 256MB RAM
|Same as Router|
Close to zero Wi-Fi settings
Netgear generally doesn’t offer many Wi-Fi settings for its Nighthawk routers, and the Netgear MK63 brought this to a new level of modesty.
You can’t separate the two Wi-Fi bands into two SSIDs (Wi-Fi network names). In fact, the only settings you can change are the name and password of the single Wi-Fi network, as well as the channels of each band. And that’s it.
Again, note that the router doesn’t support the 160 MHz channel width, but even if it doesn’t, there’s no way to make it work in any channel width anyway.
Standard network settings, no noteworthy features
The Netgear MR60 comes with a standard set of network settings. It has enough for general setup, including IP reservation, port-forwarding, and Dynamic DNS. On top of that, you’ll also file a VPN server and a Traffic Meter, which is useful in case you’re worried about running over your monthly data cap.
And the router doesn’t have much else as features.
There’s a QoS engine that was quite finicky in my tests. The feature gives you the option of letting it figure out the broadband speeds via a speed test. But when I picked this option, the page just reset after the test, and QoS never turned on.
I ended up having to punch in the download and upload speeds manually. Only then was I able to prioritize the bandwidth to certain devices. There’s no way to do that by applications.
Like most new Wi-Fi 6 routers from Netgear, the MR60 supports Netgear Armor, a subscription-based online (and offline) protection service that costs some $70/year after a short free trial. To use Armor, though, you’ll need to resort to the Netgear Nighthawk mobile app. There’s no way to configure it using the web UI.
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk: Good performance
With modest dual-band hardware specs and no multi-gig port, the MK63 is not designed to wow anyone. And its number showed. But it doesn’t mean it’s not a formidable contender.
Among those of the same price point, it did well in my tests.
Comparatively fast Wi-Fi speeds
As a single router, the MR60 delivered a sustained speed of more than 870 Mbps to my 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 client, which connected to it at 1.2 Gbps at a short distance. Farther away, at 40 feet (12 m), the pair now registered almost 695 Mbps. Both were faster than the router unit of the TP-Link Deco X60 and comparable to those of the Asus ZenWiFi XD4R.
Wi-Fi 5 clients performed well with the router, too, averaging some 760Mbps (4×4 client) at 10 feet (3 m) away and some 550Mbps (3×3 client) from 40 feet. Again, there were clearly faster than the Deco X60.
As a mesh system, I placed the Netgear MS60 40 feet away from the Netgear MR60, which did comparatively well.
Without a dedicated backhaul band, the satellite indeed showed a signal loss, just like the case of any other dual-band system.
Still, my 2×2 Wi-Fi 6 client averaged 355 Mbps and 280 Mbps at the close range long-range, respectively. And my 3×3 Wi-Fi 5 registered some 250 Mbps and 220 Mbps at similar distances.
Netgear says the MK63 can deliver an Internet connection of 100 Mbps in full –that’s not an exaggeration.
One thing to note, I tested the MK63 in the star topology where the satellites were placed around the router. In a daisy-chain (linear) setup, the speed at the unit farthest away will get quite slow. I tried that out and generally averaged just around 50 Mbps to 100 Mbps.
Excellent range and reliability
What is so not an exaggeration on Netgear’s part is the system’s range.
I was impressed with the MR60 alone. By itself, it delivered a better range than many routers of the same or even better specs, such as Linksys MR9600. I’d say it alone can handle at least some 1800 ft² (167 m²) when placed in the middle.
So, with all three hardware units, chances are they can take care of 4500 ft² (418 m²), as Netgear claims. But with Wi-Fi, your mileage always will vary.
I used the MK63 for more than a week non-stop as my primary system and had no issue with it. So, the MK63 proved to be reliable.
Netgear MK63 Nighthawk's Rating
Reliable performance, excellent coverage
First EasyMesh system
Wired backhaul support
Modest Wi-Fi specs, no dedicated backhaul band
and limited number of ports; switch required for wired backhaul configuration
Lacks basic Wi-Fi settings, no 160 MHz channel width
No multi-gig port, Dual-WAN or Link Aggregation
Finicky QoS, online protection, require a mobile app and is not free
As the first EasyMesh-based solution, the Netgear MK63 Nighthawk Dual-Band AX1800 Wi-Fi 6 Mesh System is exciting.
We’ll have to wait to see how EasyMesh pans out, but for now, by itself, the MK63 is a reliable Wi-Fi 6 system that won’t burn a hole in your pocket. Coming from Netgear, which sells the Orbi AX6000 for an arm and a leg, the MK63 is a welcome affordable Wi-Fi 6 alternative.
Make sure you note the setup process above — hint: patience is a virtue. After that, if you have a modest Internet connection or have wired your home with network cables and have a switch, this new mesh system is an excellent buy.
Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.
It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search. Your question/comment is one of many Dong Knows Tech receives daily.
(•) If you represent a company/product mentioned here, please use the contact page or a PR channel.
25 thoughts on “Netgear MK63 Nighthawk Mesh Review: A Modest but Reliable (Wired) Mesh”
Hi everyone, I bought this MK62 a month ago, but was about to put them up for sale as the 2.4Ghz band in my apartment building was overly congested and unusable. The older firmware features a single SSID shared by both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz bands, and was not user configurable. Then I found the latest firmware on Netgear’s MK62 downloads section and gave the satellite and router their respective updates. Lo and behold, a new feature appeared under ‘Advanced Settings’ that allowed me to add my own 5Ghz network and all is good.
Coverage is excellent for a 3bedroom apartment around 1500sqft, very stable and never experienced any downtime, lags nor router-freeze situations. No dead spots. I’m on a 500Mbps broadband plan and achieve between 400Mbps to 500Mbps all the time across all my devices. Of course individual uses are different for everyone. Totally worth it.
Thanks for the input, Des. Glad it’s working out for you and good job on figuring out the way to separate the bands.
I just purchased this setup thanks to this review. I’m loving it. Great performance per dollar.
One tip I can give is immediately turn off Armor Now if you want to be happy with this setup. It was unusable for me with Armor Now enabled. I would constantly have issues with the internet on WiFi clients. Ping times were doubled and overall throughout was terrible at times even with great signal quality.
I was getting so frustrated and then I turned off Armor Now. It’s been a dream ever since I did that. Went from me about ready to return it to loving the sweet deal I got. For the $170 on sale price I got, it is the best networking purchase I’ve made for the money.
Thanks for the tip, Mac, which I agree – I’d never use Armor. Glad it worked out. You really got a great deal! 🙂
Thanks for your helpful information. This looks like what I need with my DSL modem to stream TV since my cable company is going to streaming and I want to stay with my DSL provider and not get their cable modem.
You might want to use YouTube TV instead, Kim. Much better and cheaper. Also, cable internet is generally much faster than DSL. In any case, all mesh systems or routers will work with any cable or DSL modem.
I just installed a Nighthawk MR60 in 4000 sf home this week and now Costco has the MR63 on sale for less than I paid for the MR60. Should I exchange the MR60 for the new MR63?
MR60=Router, MS60=Satellite, MK(62/63)= a kit of two or three units. (There’s no MR63). You’re talking about the same thing. Read the review for more.
I purchased the mk62. Was easy to setup and it installed the newer firmware easily. I like the interface.
I ran into problems with devices choosing the main router over Satellite (with the satellite being closer) and connecting with a weak signal in the bedroom with frequent disconnects. It is such a pity that you cant manually select which one it should connect or at least create some sort of rule.
I had to move the satellite pretty close to the bedroom for most devices to connect to the satellite. Now it connects correctly 90% of the time.
Thanks for the good read.
I am currently using the Netgear RAX80 as Access Point and my ISP modem as router. If I would go for the MK63, does that mean I have to remove the RAX80 as it is working as Access Point or will it blend in?
In order to make it blend in; does this mean I have to connect the RAX80 to the eth-backhaul of the MK63 router? I want to configure the MK63 router as AP, so my ISP modem stays my network router.
You can use an AP with any existing network, Raymond, as long as you have a wired connection to it. That’s how an AP is. More here.
What I mean is; what will happen with the Mesh? Or is the MK63 not a real mesh system and is it more just a group of three access points? I initially thought that the MK63 router was working as a mesh controller for its satelites, hence my question in regards to the blend in of the RAX80. Or are only the ORBI products mesh products that are controlled? Maybe I do not understand mesh right.
A couple of things, Raymond:
1. Read this review again. Pay attention.
2. Check out this post on mesh in general. Pay attention.
3. Read the post I link in the previous reply. Pay attention.
Great website. Thank you for all of your analysis.
I am trying to decide between the Netgear MK63 and the Asus XD4. I’ll set it up with wired backhaul for a 3 story 4500+ sq ft house. I’m most concerned about maintaining speed/performance in all parts of the house as well as the easy of use.
Any recommendations about which one of these two models would be better for my situation? What should I be looking for regarding features/functions that will differentiate the two
Go with the XD4, or another dual-band combo, David.
I am French and in France we have a box with our fiber or adsl subscription to have telephony and Tv package via the subscription. I bought 2 MK63 systems.
So I have 2 routers and 4 satellites.
At the moment I have:
– left my box as a router and deactivated its wifi.
– put the 2 routers as an access point (1 directly connected to my box by the WAN port of the MR60, and 1 in a garden shed connected by the WAN port to a network outlet connected to my switch).
I configured the SSIDs of the 2 access points identically for the main WIFI. And I did the same for the 2 access points for the guest WIFI.
– associate my 4 satellites with the access point connected directly to my box.
1 – Now I have WIFI in the garden and no cut-off between inside and outside. I therefore think that the access point of the garden shed is on the same wifi network and is part of the same mesh. Even though I see this access point as a device not connected to the other MR60 in the mobile app or web user interface.
2 – The configuration at the access points is almost non-existent. No possibility of managing WIFI time slots etc ….
1 – when I connect my satellites to network sockets connected to the switch, I always see 5ghz link in the mobile application or the web user interface. Why ?
2 – Do you think that it is possible to remove the box from the internet provider and use one MR60 as a router and the other as an access point. Thus allowing the use of the router functions of the MR60?
In this case, could I connect the satellites to the network sockets and finally take advantage of the ethernet backhaul?
Thanks and sorry for the length 😉
To and answer you questions, Coutard: Yes and yes. In fact you should do that, or use a double NAT setup. Then use just one of the MR60 units as the router for all of the Netgear hardware. More here: https://dongknows.com/double-nat-vs-single-nat/
Just hooked one of these up with 3 satellites to my Virgin router – really patchy cover before – have cat 5e through house and wired back haul – pretty much 350 mb / s download speed through whole hose now (big 4 storey Victorian with thick walls and kitchen extension) – some areas had nothing before. Seems perfect! Great advice thanks.
Excellent! Good job, Paul.
I enjoyed your article as I am a novice when it comes to understanding Networks, and recently bought the Nighthawk MK63 mesh system from Costco. I have new Centurylink Fiber and the Modem/Router they installed (C4000xg) is crap. On one tech visit they set up separate networks for the 2.4 and 5 ghz, but we basically use the 2.4 around the house. Wife is a teacher and have 2 young kids doing online schooling and have signal loss and drops around the house so need more reliable wifi in the basement and 2nd floor bedrooms so thought a mesh system would be a good option.
I tried installing the TP-link deco, but was told by one Centurylink tech that it was not compatible, so took it back and bought the Nighthawk. I was hoping to get something that would plug into the ONT device so could get rid of the C4000xg, but after some reading it sounds like need to keep the C4000xg and just alter it to only being a modem. Does that make sense?
That makes sense, Kris. I talked more about that and other options in this post.
If I’m going to use wired backhaul with 150mb Internet service, do you have any thoughts on how this Nighthawk mesh system compares against the others, particularly the Eero?
I might just put them all in AP mode. If that’s the case, would I be better off using all-in-one routers as APs? Or actual APs?
I’m not necessarily interested in managing a prosumer or business class system. I just need better coverage in our home and something that will reliably handle us all working/learning from home at the same time.
I’d never use the Eero, nor will I ever recommend it. If you have wired backhaul, it’ll work out great. Don’t bother with the AP mode.
Thanks for the reply. What don’t you like about the Eero?
I was thinking about keeping my Edgerouter X for the SQM and then finding something to use as APs, such as this nighthawk system.
Its only purpose is to mine user information, Greg.