If you have a home networkโwith a dated Wi-Fi standard or no Wi-Fi at allโand want to upgrade it straight to Wi-Fi 7, the Zyxel WBE660S BE22000 Wi-Fi 7 Triple-Radio NebulaFlex Pro Access Point would be right up your alley.
This first Wi-Fi 7 access point on the market has everything for a super-fast network. You can use one as a standalone unit or get a couple and mesh them into a Wi-Fi system.
The latter would require a cloud-based Xyzel Nubula account and will likely be a topic for another post. This review focuses mostly on the access point as a single broadcaster.
In either case, be prepared to invest a good amount of cash. While the $600 retail price is friendly enoughโit is already significantly lower than the $850 MSRPโyou need more than that to turn this access point into action, namely a 10Gbps-ready PoE++ switch or equivalent injector.
That's not to mention a 10Gbps-ready router, preferably a non-Wi-Fi one. But if you have all that, the Zyxel WBE660S will give you a formidable Wi-Fi network. So consider one today!
Zyxel WBE660S: A solid Wi-Fi 7 multi-Gigabit access point
The WBE660s is like no other standard Wi-Fi access point I've seen. Out of the box, it feels super solid, with a metal base and a hardened plastic top. The AP is oval-ish with four rounded corners and seems so tough that I originally thought it was built for the outdoors until I saw "Indoor Use only" on its underside. That was a bit of a letdown.
What makes it unique, at least for now, is that it includes a 10Gbps BASE-T PoE++ LAN port and features 320MHz Wi-Fi 7 inside. There's also a Gigabit LAN port to host a wired device for the network, such as a network speaker.
It's safe to say the WBE660S is the most souped-up member of Zyxel's NebulaFlex product line. But as part of the family, it's similar to the previous access point, including the Wi-Fi 6 WAX630S I reviewed over a year ago.
At the least, neither includes a power adapter or a PoE injector. And in the case of the WBE660S, you'll need a PoE++ unit that's 10Gbps-capable, and that can be pricey. Alternatively, you'd need an equivalent PoE switch, such as the Zyxel XS1930-12HP, which is even more expensive.
The table below shows the differences between the two. It's not a fair comparison.
Zyxel WBE660S vs. WAX630S: Hardware specifications
Name | Zyxel WBE660S BE22000 Wi-Fi 7 Triple-Radio NebulaFlex Pro Access Point | Zyxel WAX630S AX3000 Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Radio NebulaFlex Pro Access Point |
Model | WBE660S | WAX630S |
Wi-Fi Standards | BE22000 | AX3000 |
Broadcasting Power | US (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz): 29/28/23dBm EU (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz): 19/25/22dBm | US (2.4GHz/5GHz): 23/28 dBm EU (2.4GHz/5GHz): 19/25 dBm |
6 GHz Speeds (channel width) | 4x4 BE: Up to 11530 Mbps (20/40/80/160/320MHz) | None |
5 GHz Speeds (channel width) | 4x4 BE: Up to 8646 Mbps (20/40/80/160/240MHz) | 4ร4 AX: Up to 2400Mbps (20/40/80MHz). Or 2ร4 AX: Up to 2400Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
2.4 GH Speeds (channel with) | 4x4 BE: Up to 1376 Mbps (20/40MHz) | 2ร2 AX: Up to 600Mbps (20/40MHz) |
Number of SSIDs | 8 (single or multiple bands) | |
Operating Mode | Standalone or via Controller/Nebula Cloud-managed (Nebula account required) | |
Roaming Standard | Pre-authentication, PMK caching and 802.11r/k/v | |
Backward Compatibility | 802.11/axe/ax/ac/n/g/a/b | 802.11ac/n/g/a/b |
Power over Ethernet (PoE) | 802.11bt (PoE++) | 802.11at (PoE+) |
PoE Power Draw | 41W | 19.5W |
Injector Induded | None | |
DC input | USB PD 15 VDC 3 A (USB-C port) | 12V DC at 2 A |
Adapter Included | None | |
Multi-Gig port | 1 x 10GBASE-T PoE++ Multi-Gig LAN | 1x 2.5GBASE-T PoE Multi-Gig LAN |
Gigabit Port | 1 x 1 Gbps LAN | |
Wireless Security Methods | WEP/WPA/WPA2-PSK/WPA3 | |
Authentication | IEEE 802.1X/RADIUS | |
Access Management | L2-isolation/MAC filtering/Rogue AP detection | |
Mobile App | Zyxel Nebula | |
Dimensions (W x D x H) | 12.21 x 7.01 x 2.21 in (310 x 178 x 56 mm) | 7.09 x 7.09 x 1.54 in (180 x 180 x 39 mm) |
Weight | 3.11 lbs (1412 g) | 1.17 lbs (530 g) |
Operating Environment | Temperature: 0ยฐC to 45ยฐC/32ยฐF to 113ยฐF Humidity: 10% to 90% (non-condensing) | Temperature: 0ยฐC to 50ยฐC/32ยฐF to 122ยฐF Humidity: 10% to 95% (non-condensing) |
Processor | Qualcomm 4-Core CPU | |
Release Date | October 17, 2023 | March 15, 2022 |
US Price (at launch) | $599.99 | $380 |
A standard access point
Despite the multi-gigabit specs, the WBE660S is a standard PoE access point. When you have a PoE++ injector or switch, you can set it up just like any PoE device. Specifically, here are the two simple steps for the hardware:
- Mount the access point to where you wantโthe included accessories make this an easy job.
- Use a long network cable to connect its 10Gbps PoE port to the existing network via an injector or a PoE switch.
That's it. The hardware installation is complete. After that, you have two options to make the access point work: its local web user interface or Zyxel Nebula cloud management.
If you only use a single unit as a standalone broadcaster, the web user interface is the way to go. In this case, you can use the access point completely independently from the vendor. However, if you have two or more units, including previous Nebula-enabled access points, cloud management, which requires a login account, is the only way to mesh them into a single Wi-Fi system.
It's important to note that you can use either of the two. If you have already set up the WBE660S using the local web user interface, you must reset itโvia the interface or the reset button on its undersideโbefore you can link it to the Nebula Control Center. The other way around, you must first remove it from Nebula, which will automatically reset it.
As mentioned, this review treats the access point primarily as a standalone broadcaster.
Self-explanatory but intimidating local web user interface
You access the WBE660S's local web user interface via its IP address. This address is given out by your routerโit changes. It's fairly easy to figure out the IP address of a connected device, but if you're not familiar with the process, this post on the IP address will explain it in detail.
After that, from a local computer, navigate a browserโChrome, Safari, or Edgeโto the IP address of the access point. In the example screenshots below, that IP is 192.168.88.16. Yours will likely be something else of a similar format.
Tip: Since it's a local web user interface, you can ignore the security message and proceed to access the IP address. The AP's default username and password are admin and 1234, which you'll be prompted to change immediately.
Once logged in, you'll be greeted with a standard yet comprehensive menu-based web interface that's self-explanatory for anyone who's worked with a similar interface before. Still, as an advanced access point, the WBE660S has lots and lots of settingsโlikely all those available in enterprise-class access pointsโwhich can be intimidating for the uninitiated.
For most situations, however, you only need to care about the SSIDsโthe Wi-Fi networks. The WBE660S supports up to 8 SSIDs. You can manually make each SSID to handle all three bands (2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz) or just one or two bands. Generally, it's best to use one SSID for each band. But that's generally a personal preference.
And after that, you can leave the rest alone. The Wi-Fi network is now ready.
Nebula cloud-based management is a viable option
While using Zyxel's Nebula cloud-based management is not necessary if you have a single access point, it can be a good option. Nebula comes in two flavors: free and Pro. The latter requires a 39.99/year per device subscription, though the former is more than enough for any home or small business.
The idea of Nebula is that the web interface is now tied to a Zyxel login account, which allows you to manage the Wi-Fi network from anywhere in the world. You can also manage multiple networks at different geographical locationsโwith the option of pinning on a world mapโin one place. Each network has different network profile(s) (SSIDs and other settings). Once added, a new access point automatically picks up the profile(s) and works with existing APs, if any, to form a unified mesh system.
Additionally, with Nebula, users have the option to use the mobile app of the same name, which makes adding access to the network and remote management more convenient.
Overall, Nubula is similar to the TP-Link Omada or EnGenius FIT but geared more toward enterprise applications. For this reason, it can be overwhelming for home or small business users.
Zyxel WBE660S: Reliable coverage, real Wi-Fi 7 performance
I tested the WBE660S for over a weekโwith the help of a Zyxel XS1930-12HP on top of a 10Gbps fiber-optic lineโand was happy with it. It was the second Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster, besides the Asus RT-BE96U, to offer "real" Wi-Fi 7 performance. Specifically, my test clients connected to it at around 3Gbps and sustained consistently over Gigabit.
Wi-Fi 7 is not yet fully ratified, and my testing method has also slowly evolved. I did more tests on the WBE660S than with previous Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters by using Wi-Fi 7 clients also on the 5GHz and 2.4GHz bands, and the result was quite interesting. Specifically, out of this Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster, I noted that:
- on the 5GHz band, Wi-Fi 7 clients were not necessarily faster than Wi-Fi 6/E devices of the same dual-stream (2x2) specs.
- on the 2.4GHz band, the speed was virtually the same no matter what clients you use, Wi-Fi 7, Wi-Fi 6, or Wi-Fi 4.
Like previous Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters, the WBE660S didn't support Multi-Link Operation or Automated Frequency Coordinationโneither feature was yet available to the standard. For this reason, the access point worked like a simple tri-band broadcaster.
The Zyxel WBE660S passed my 3-day stress test with no disconnection, and it had excellent coverage, similar to that of the Asus RT-BE96U. If you live in a home of around 2500 ft2 (232 m2) without thick walls, place the WBE660S at the center, and it likely will blanket the entire place. Still, Wi-Fi coverage depends greatly on the environment, and your mileage will vary.
The access point has no internal fanโit seemed that way, but I didn't open it up to checkโand it remained relatively cool during operation. It became only slightly warm when I touched its top, even during heavy operation. Its underside metal base was a bit warmer, indicating the fact it worked well as a heatsink.
Overall, considering the current unfinished stage of Wi-Fi 7, the Zyxel WBE660S proved to be an excellent broadcaster, performance-wise. Hopefully, things will only improve when the standard is finalized sometime next year.
Zyxel WBE660S Wi-Fi 7 Access Point's Rating
Pros
Wi-Fi 7 support with reliable Gig+ sustained performance; excellent coverage
10Gbps PoE++ network port, extra Gigabit port
Excellent design, ready to mount; full local web user interface; generous free-tier cloud-based management
Cons
No power adapter or PoE injector is included
Wi-Fi 7 performance could comparatively be better
Daunting amount of features; Nebula Control Center is sluggish and can be confusing
Conclusion
The Zyxel WBE660S BE22000 Wi-Fi 7 Triple-Radio NebulaFlex Pro Access Point makes an excellent one-stop upgrade for anyone who wants Wi-Fi 7 today.
It best fits those with a non-Wifi router but can also be a device to add to a network that currently has a 5 or older standard. Or you can turn off the Wi-Fi function of your existing router. And if you have a 10Gbps PoE++ switch at the current street price of $600, it's almost a must-have. Give it a try!
There’s a minor typo in the specs — 5GHz band supports 240MHz operation, not just 160.
It’s listed correctly in the spec comparison table on the WBE750. ๐ https://dongknows.com/netgear-wbe750-wi-fi-7-access-point/
Fixed. Thanks. Next time you can just highlight the text and hit the red button that jumps out.
Would you choose this ZyXel overthe Omada AEP783? They cost about the same.
I haven’t tested this TP-Link AP, but in terms of platform, Omada requires a hardware controller while Zyxel doesn’t. As a single unit, I’d go with the Zyxel since it’s local web-based management is more comprehensive.
This is not truth. You can download the software based controller to configure the EAP783. I have the EAP783 and use the software controller under windows. They also have a linux version and you can decide to run it 100% of the time to collect statistics if you want or just run it, configure the AP and shutdown the software.
And where do you run that software controller, Diego? A computer is more expensive hardware than an actual controller. I mentioned that in the post about TP-Link Omada (link in the previous reply), read it! The point is you need additional hardware to run TP-Link APs as a system.
Hey Doug,
Thanks for the detailed review as always. Do you know if the AP now supports MLO (with firmware updates?)
Reading your review of the lower end model from the same manufacturer (Zyxel NWA130BE), it looks that that one does support MLO? (or perhaps that review just doesn’t mention/measure)?
Would love an update / clarification.
Thank You!
I don’t work for Zyxel, Shaunak, but that’s the idea. I think it’s just a matter of time.
Hi Dong. Iโm searching for 2 Zyxel AP to connect them to the Zyxel EX5601-T0 (with WAN and LAN 2.5 GbE ports) via two MG108 switches (my house has three floors). In this moment I recycled three Fritz AP/extender and Iโm not satisfied. Iโve read your test on NEA220AX and this above, but I donโt know if there are better alternatives and not too expensive. Any suggestion?
You don’t need to use Zyxel APs, Mauro. So maybe a couple of these.
What street did you purchase this on? It’s $200 dollars higher on Amazon than your street price of $600.
The street price changes, bean. It used to be $599.99 on Amazon.
Since you did connect to a 10G switch.. why is the performance always under 2.5G?
A connection depends on all parties involved and is limited by whichever slowest. So far, there are only 2×2 clients. Also, Wi-Fi has crazy overhead. More here.
Hey Doug,
Any chance you could include latency performance in your future posts? I know it’s extra effort, but it could add some really interesting data for your readers!
Appreciate your dedication,
Woundman
Thought about it, but it’s impossible to have a consistent, repeatable test on latency unfortunately. Without one, you’d always compare apple to oranges.
Also, the name is Dong.