Thursday, December 1, 2022 β€’ Welcome to the πŸ’― No-Nonsense Zone!
πŸ›οΈ Check out Today’s πŸ”₯Amazon logoDeals! πŸ›’

TP-Link Archer AXE300 Review: A Top-notch Standalone Wi-Fi 6E Router

Share what you're reading!

The Archer AXE16000 Quad-Band 16-Stream Wi-Fi 6E Router (model Archer AXE300) decidedly puts TP-Link on the list of prominent Wi-Fi 6E vendors. But that’s the least exciting thing about this new Wi-Fi machine.

With this Archer AXE300, you’ll also find the availability of the $799.99 Deco XE200 Wi-Fi 6E AXE11000 Tri-Band Mesh System, which I will review later. The networking company first announced these two new Wi-Fi 6E hardware in January this year.

Among other things, the Archer AXE300 is the first Quad-band Wi-Fi router with three Multi-Gig ports and SFP+ support, which its main competitor, the Asus GT-AXE16000, doesn’t have. Most importantly, the new router proved to be a formidable performer in my hands-on testing.

Here’s the bottom line: If you’re looking for a well-performing standalone router ready to host a Multi-Gig network right out of the box (which you can expand via a switch) at the current price of $600, the Archer AXE300 is an excellent buy. Go for it!

Dong’s note: I first published this piece on October 11, 2022, as a preview and updated it on October 25 to an in-depth review after thorough hands-on testing.

The TP-Link AXE300 Wi-Fi 6E is the latest Quad-band router.
The TP-Link AXE300 Wi-Fi 6E is the latest Quad-band router.

TP-Link Archer AXE300: A non-compromising home router

The TP-Link Archer AXE300 is a large square box with eight non-removable antennas mounted at its four corners. These are large antennas making the whole package relatively bulky.

It’s pretty hard to figure out which side is the router’s “front”, but you can call the side that houses the network port its “back” and go from there.

What’s important, on the inside, the Archer AXE300 practically has everything you’d want in a standalone router. (The word is put in italic intentionally and you’ll find out why.)

This third Quad-band piece of hardware — after the Netgear Orbi RBRK960 and the Asus GT-AXE16000 — has mighty processing power, three flexible Multi-Gig ports, and top-their Wi-Fi specs with a combined bandwidth of 16000Mbps.

It can also have a robust local web user interface and a great set of features and network settings. But, like all things, it’s still not perfect.

Let’s check the hardware specs.

Archer AXE300: Hardware specifications and power consumption

ModelArcher AXE300
Dimensions9.1 Γ— 9.1 Γ— 2.7 in
(232 Γ— 232 Γ— 68 mm)
Weight3.75lbs (1.7kg)
Processing Power2.0 GHz Quad-Core CPU,
1GB RAM, 256MB Flash
Wi-Fi BandwidthQuad-band AXE16000
1st Band 
(channel width)
4×4 2.4GHz AX: Up to 1148Mbps
(20/40MHz)
2nd Band
(channel width)
4×4 5GHz-1 AX: Up to 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
3rd Band
(channel width)
4×4 5GHz-2 AX: Up to 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
4th Band
(channel width)
4×4 6GHz AXE: Up to 4804Mbps
(20/40/80/160MHz)
Backward Compatibility802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi
Wireless SecurityWPA / WPA2 / WPA3
Web User InterfaceYes
Mobile AppTP-Link Tether
(optional)
Operating RolesRouter (default) or Access Point
Mesh-ReadyYes (OneMesh)
USB Port1x USB 3.0
Gigabit Port4x LAN 
Multi-Gig Port1x 2.5Gbps Multi-Gig LAN/LAN
1x 10Gbps Multi-Gig LAN/WAN
 1Γ— 10 Gbps Multi-Gig/SFP+ Combo WAN/LAN
Link AggregationLAN only
(LAN2 + LAN3)
LACP or Static
Dual-WAN SupportNo
Power Intake100-240V
Power Consumption
(per 24 hours)
β‰ˆ 465 Wh
(as tested)
Release DateOctober 2022
U.S MSRP$599.99
TP-Link Archer AXE300’s hardware specifications

Flexible Multi-Gig ports with a hint of SFP+

Like the case of the Asus GT-AXE1600, the TP-Link AXE300 comes with three Multi-Gig ports, including two 10GbE ports and one 2.5GbE port. You can use any of them as the WAN port, and the rest will work as LANs.

What sets the new router apart is its first 10Gbps port, which is also its default WAN port. It’s a 10Gbps BaseT/SFP+ combo port, meaning you can use it as a Multi-Gig port or an SFP+ at a time. (If you’re unfamiliar with SFP+ open the drawer below for more.)

Ethernet: BaseT vs SFP+

BaseT (RJ45) and SFP(+) in brieft

BASE-T (or BaseT) is the common port type and refers to the wiring method used inside a network cable and the connectors at its ends, which is 8-position 8-contact (8P8C).

This type is known via a misnomer called Registered Jack 45 or RJ45. So we’ll keep calling it RJ45.

On the other hand, the SFP or SFP+ (plus) port type is used mostly for enterprise applications. SFP stands for small form pluggable and is the technical name for what is often referred to as Fiber Channel or Fiber.

Best among Multi-Gigabit Routers: The Asus RT AX89X 10GbpsTP Link Archer AXE300 Ports Multi Gig
Base-T Multi-Gig vs SFP+: The two are generally available as separate ports, such as in the Asus RT-AX89X‘s case (left) but can also be part of a combo port in some hardware, such as the TP-Link Archer AXE300.

An SFP+ port has speed grades of either 1Gbps or 10Gbps. The older version, SFP, can only do 1Gbps, though it shares the same port type as SFP+. This type of port standard is more strict in compatibility and more reliable in performance. And that’s all you need to know about SFP/+.

While physically different, Base-T and SFP/+ are both parts of the Ethernet family, sharing the same networking principles and Ethernet naming convention — Gigabit Ethernet (1Gbps) or 10 Gigabit Ethernet (a.k.a 10GE, 10GbE, or 10 GigE).

Generally, you can get an adapter to use a BaseT device with an SFP or SFP+ port. Still, in this case, compatibility can be an issue — a particular adapter might only work (well) with the SFP/+ port of certain hardware vendors.

BASE-T is more popular thanks to its flexibility in speed support and backward compatibility. Faster-than-Gigabit Base-T is often called Multi-Gig, which includes 2.5GBASE-T (2.5Gbps) and 5GBASE-T (5Gbps).

There are routers and switches that include an RJ45/SFP+ combo port — there are two physical ports but you can use one at a time.

This flexibility means the AXE300 can host an SFP+ Fiber-optic ONT, an SFP+ device, such as a NAS server, or a standard RJ45 device of the same roles.

TP-Link told me the SFP+ port “should work with Fiber-Optic as it is a standard SFP+ port.” However, the company hasn’t tested it with locals in the US and elsewhere.

TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router has three Multi Gig ports
The TP-Link Archer AXE300’s first 10Gbps port is an RJ45/SFP+ combo — you can only use it as a 10Gbps BASE-T or an SFP+ at a time. (The SFP+ has a lid by default.) You can use any of the Multi-Gig ports as the WAN port, and the remaining will work as LANs.

Prior to this, the only other home router with two 10Gbps ports and support for SFP+ is the Asus RT-AX89X, of which the SFP+ port is unavailable in the standard Multi-Gig form.

So with the Archer AXE300, you can host two Multi-Gig devices right out of the box while hosting super-fast broadband simultaneously. For best performance, though, I’d recommend getting a Multi-Gig switch — the Zyxel XS1930-12HP or TP-Link’s own TL-SX1008 will come in handy.

Home router and 10Gbps grade

To deliver (close to) true 10Gbps, a router needs more than just a couple of 10Gbps Ethernet network ports. Among other things, it also needs high processing power (and good firmware) to handle this type of traffic.

So far, most home routers, including top-tier ones, do not meet all the requirements for true 10Gbps (10,000Mbps) throughputs. Consequently, after “overhead,” they sustain at 6,000Mbps, give or take, on a good day. (A similar thing can be said about most 10Gbps switches though they tend to have better-sustained rates than routers.)

That’s partially why more home Wi-Fi routers support the lowest tier of Multi-Gig, which is with 2.5Gbps, than those with 10Gbps ports. In this case, you can expect them to deliver close to 2,500Mbps in real-world speeds.

And that also proved to be the case with the TP-Lik AXE300, as you’ll note in the performance section below.

Besides the Multi-Gig ports, the Archer AXE300 also has four Gigabit ports, of which you can combine the LAN2 and LAN3 ports to form a 2Gbps Link Aggregation connection.

Unfortunately, the router doesn’t feature Dual-WAN, which will come in handy for those with two Internet plans. Furthermore, you can’t turn a Gigabit LAN port into the WAN role to free up all Multi-Gig ports to work as LANs. But that’s just another example of how we can’t get everything.

TP-Link Archer AXE300: Detail photos

TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router retail boxTP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router out of box
The TP-Link Archer AXE300 AXE16000 Quad-Band 16-Stream Wi-Fi 6E router’s retail box and its content

Out of the box, the TP-Link Archer AXE300 AXE16000 Quad-Band 16-Stream Wi-Fi 6E Router is quite large.
Out of the box, the TP-Link Archer AXE300 AXE16000 Quad-Band 16-Stream Wi-Fi 6E Router is quite large and somewhat awkwardly designed.

You can swivel the TP-Link AXE300's eight non-removable antennas 360 degrees around, but you can't pull them outward.
You can swivel the TP-Link AXE300’s eight non-removable antennas 360 degrees, but you can’t pull them outward. Also, there’s not enough space on the sides to keep the antennas from sticking out.

TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router ButtonsTP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router U
The TP-Link Archer AXE300 has convenient buttons for its WPS, Wi-Fi, LED lights on the front side, and a USB 30. port and an on/off switch on the right side.

All of the TP-Link Archer AXE300's network ports are on its back.
All of the TP-Link Archer AXE300’s network ports are on its back.

The TP-Link AXE300 is wall-mountable
The TP-Link AXE300 is wall-mountable

The TP-Link Archer AXE300 has a pretty large power adapter.
The TP-Link Archer AXE300 has a pretty large power adapter.

When in action, the TP-Link Archer AXE300's top lighting is relatively modest.
When in action, the TP-Link Archer AXE300’s top lighting is relatively modest.

A familiar TP-Link Archer experience

Despite the new and exciting hardware specs, the Archer AXE300 felt familiar in my experience. It shared the same firmware, interface, and mobile app (optional) as other Archer routers I’ve tested.

TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi SettingsTP Link AXE300 WAN Port Selection
You can easily select which Multi-Gig port of the Archer AXE300 to work as the WAN port. However, its Wi-Fi settings, while highly customizable in terms of SSIDs and channels, have no performance-favoring options — the higher speed grades are only available in the options for compatibility.

And thanks to the local interface, if you’ve worked with a standard home router before, you’ll be able to handle this new machine with no issue.

Specifically, to set up the router, all you have to do is connect a computer to its default Wi-Fi (printed on the underside) or a LAN port. After that, navigate a browser to its default IP (192.168.0.1) or tplinkwifi.net; the rest is self-explanatory.

As mentioned above, the router’s first 10GbE port is the default WAN, but you can change that role to the other 10GbE or 2.5GbE port during the setup process or at any time. Now the remaining Multi-Gig port will work as LANs.

In my testing, the switch took just a minute to apply, and the router didn’t even need to restart.

Standard settings and mobile app

the Archer AXE300 has all the goodies in terms of network customizability. There are many options, including the support for Dynamic DNS (with a free TP-Link-based server included, though you’d need a TP-Link login account), port forwarding, VPN (all server types and client options), and a lot more.

TP Link Archer AXE300 Network Check FinishedTP Link Archer AXE300 HomeShield Pro
The included HomeShield is relatively light on protection. For more, you’d need to use HomeSheild Pro, which costs a premium and require the TP-Link Tether mobile app.

As for features, the router includes QoS, Parental Controls, and some flavor of online protection.

However, if you want more comprehensive protection, you’ll need to opt for HomeShield Pro and use a TP-Link login account. That’s the same deal for all Archer (and Deco) hardware.

TP-Link and your privacy

Having to sign in with an account means your hardware always connects to the vendor. In TP-Link’s case, you’ll manage your home network entirely or partially through the company.

And that translates into inherent privacy risks. Here’s TP-Link’s Privacy Policy — make sure you are comfortable with what it collects from your network.

TP-Link is headquartered in China, where the practice of online privacy, surveillance, data collection, and security might differ from the rest of the world.

Privacy is a matter of degree. While managing your network via a third party is never a good idea, data collection varies vendor by vendor.

A standalone router at heart

As mentioned above, considering its hardware specs and Multi-Gig ports, the Archer AXE300 is meant to be a standalone router.

Yes, the router supported TP-Link’s OneMesh, where you can add an extender to it to scale up the Wi-Fi coverage. And that worked well in my trial with the RE715X.

Unfortunately, the extender itself, despite being the “high-end” among OneMesh-ready extenders, has middling Wi-Fi specs. Consequently, clients connected to the mesh satellite had just a portion of the speed they could get when connected directly to the router. And that makes its second 5GHz band a little redundant.

Generally, when it comes to Multi-Gig speed grades, you need to get your home wired, and for now, there’s no mesh option for the AXE300 that won’t reduce its performance significantly.

So it’s best to consider this router if you only need a standalone broadcaster or intend to use access points to scale up the coverage.

But chances are you’ll do just fine with the Archer AXE300 alone.

TP-Link Archer AXE300: Exellent performance

I tested the Archer AXE300 for almost a week and was generally happy with it. As a standalone router, it delivered a similar experience as the Asus GT-AXE1600 but at a lower cost.

For one, it proved reliable, passing our intense stress test with no issue.

And it had an excellent collective range. It’s hard to quantify this, but if you live in a home of around 2000 ft2 (186 m2), give or take, this router will e able to deliver strong signals to every corner.

In terms of throughput speeds, the router was overall excellent but not with some usual caveats.

Fast but far from “true” 10Gbps

I tested the router’s Multi-Gig ports the way I do switches, and the router was fast but sustained well below 10Gbps, just like the case of others with similar port grades.

The router’s 10GbE BASE-T ports are Multi-Gig, meaning they will work at lower grades including 5Gbps, 2.5Gbps, and Gigabit when applicable. I didn’t test them in all supported grades but they indeed panned out that way in my trial.

The TP-Link AXE300's Multi-Gig performance with 10Gbps, 2.5Gbps, and Gigabit wired clients
The TP-Link AXE300’s Multi-Gig performance with 10Gbps, 2.5Gbps, and Gigabit wired clients.

Specifically, when used as LAN ports hosting two 10GbE-enabled clients, the router’s two 10Gbps ports sustained at just above 5Gbps.

And when hosting a 10Gbps Fiber-optic, either of its 10GbE ports could deliver close to 6Gbps of bandwidth.

Fast Wi-Fi performance

The Archer AXE300 was consistently excellent. It’s easily one of the fastest routers I’ve tested.

TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi Short Range PerformanceTP Link AXE300 Wi Fi Long Range Performance
The TP-Link AXE300’s Wi-Fi performance

It’s also worth noting that the router’s gaps between the close range and long range were narrow, showing that it had strong signals.

USB port’s NAS performance could be better

And finally, when hosting a portable drive, Archer AXE300 did well, though not as well as I’d hoped.

I used a few super-fast portable SSDs with USB ports, and the performance didn’t match the Multi-Gig connections, be it the 2.4Gbps or 10Gbps port, as you’ll note in the charts below.

TP Link AXE300 NAS Read PerformanceTP Link AXE300 NAS Write Performance
The TP-Link AXE300’s network storage performance when hosting a portable SSD

But the router wasn’t slow, sustaining over 120MB/s for writing and over 200MB/s for reading. At these rates, it could handle most everyday network storage needs with no issues.

Like all TP-Link Archer routers, apart from data sharing and media streaming, the AXE300 can work as a Time Capsule alternative which can be a bonus for Mac users.


Overall, the Archer AXE300’s performance is similar to the Asus GT-AXE1600, which is excellent. The two have similar performances — the differences are within the margins of errors.

If you want to see them stacked against each other directly, check back later among the other matchup posts.

TP-Link Archer AXE300's Rating

8.5 out of 10
TP Link AXE300 Wi Fi 6E Quad band Router other retail box
Performance
9 out of 10
Features
8 out of 10
Design and Setup
8 out of 10
Value
9 out of 10

Pros

Top-tier hardware with excellent performance; three flexible Multi-Gig ports and LAN Link Aggregation support

Robust web user interface; lots of network and Wi-Fi settings and a handful of valuable features for home users

Comparatively cheaper than competitors

Wall-mountable; useful optional mobile app; OneMesh-ready

Cons

No option for Gigabit WAN, Dual-WAN, or fast mesh with wired backhauling

HomeShield Pro requires a subscription, mobile app, and login account

Bulky design, the USB port's performance could be better

Conclusion

The TP-Link Archer AXE300 is an excellent Wi-Fi 6E router worthy of its $600 price tag.

If you live in a relatively large, airy home with super-fast Internet and want a top-notch network, get this new Wi-Fi Machine today.

On the other hand, if you intend to scale up the Wi-Fi coverage later, this router is a bit handicapped due to the limitation of TP-Link’s OneMesh. In this case, you’re better off opting for a couple of Multi-Gig access points or picking another Multi-Gig option among these.

Share what you just read!

Comments are subject to approval, redaction, or removal.

It's generally faster to get answers via site/page search -- your question/comment is one of many that Dong Knows Tech receives daily.  

  1. Strictly no bigotry, profanity, trolling, violence, or spamming -- including unsolicited bashing/praising/plugging a product/brand (β€’).
  2. You're presumed to have read this page in its entirety, including related linked posts and previous comments -- questions already addressed will likely be ignored.
  3. Be reasonable, attentive, and respectful! (No typo-laden, broken-thought, or cryptic comments, please!)

(β€’) Per the πŸ’―no-nonsense policy, all comments with an external link are scrutinized, and most links are redacted. Do not leave a comment if you're, in any capacity, representing a company/product mentioned here! Instead, send Dong Knows Tech a private message or use a PR channel.

If you intend to violate any of the rules above, you'll only waste your time. Don't do it!

Thank you!

43 thoughts on “TP-Link Archer AXE300 Review: A Top-notch Standalone Wi-Fi 6E Router”

  1. Hey Dong,

    Do you think running the router in AP mode instead of router could free up processing/overhead for it to maybe achieve higher speeds between the 10Gb ports?

    Reply
      • I’m not sure if it’s completely pointless. For the price to get a WAP that can do Quad band wifi 6E and then a separate switch that can handle 10Gb would be more expensive, no?

        Reply
        • Sure, but then you’ll lack PoE and extra ports, etc. The hardware is a bit too bulky to work as an access point, and you’ll need another similar router for your Multi-Gig WAN (which?). But looking strictly in terms of cost, it’s not completely pointless, which was why I used “kinda”. πŸ™‚

          Reply
  2. can i have separate ssid for each band? different ssid for 5ghz and 6ghz. i just bought another brand, it uses the same ssid for all bands. my samsung phone and desktop connect most of the time to wifi6 5ghz instead of wifi6e 6ghz.

    Reply
  3. Hello Dong, nice review. Could you tell me if you had a PC with a 2.5Gbps NIC plugged into one of the AXE300 10Gbps ports, would the AXE300 negotiate at the 2.5Gbps speed, or will it only negotiate at 1Gbps or 10Gbps, and as a result drop the connection to 1Gbps?

    Reply
      • Another great article Dong. So, 10Base-T = 1 or 10Gbps, but nothing in between. Multi-Gig could equal 1, 2.5, 5 or 10Gbps depending on your hardware at each end. The question then becomes, does the AXE300 have Milti-Gig ports that support 2.5/5/10, or just 10base-T that support 1 or 10Gbps negotiations only. Or maybe it doesn’t matter, see my comments below the specs.

        The specs only list:
        β€’ 1Γ— 10 Gbps RJ45/SFP+ Combo WAN/LAN Port
        β€’ 1Γ— 10 Gbps WAN/LAN Port,
        β€’ 1Γ— 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN Port
        β€’ 4Γ— 1 Gbps LAN Ports

        I guess one could plug their ONT from their fiber internet into the 10GbpsRJ45/SFP+ combo port, which would negotiate at 10Gbps in order to feed their 2.5 or 5Gbps internet speed to the AXE300. And then link their PCs 2.5Gbps NIC port into the AXE300 2.5Gbps port to realize up to 2.5Ghz internet speeds. Alternatively, if your PC had a 10Gbps NIC, you could use the AXE300s 10Gbps WAN/LAN port to the PC in order to realize 5 or 10Gbps internet speeds.

        Let me know if I’ve missed anything here.

        Reply
        • Multi-Gig, Chris. All modern and new 10Gbps Base-T ports are now like that. But if you use the SFP+ port, it’ll be 1Gbps or 10Gbps. We’re taking about the negotiated ceiling speeds here. So if your Fiber broadband is multi-gigabit you’d hope that the port negotiates at 10Gbps.

          Reply
  4. Could this things get any uglier? {…}. Dong: you have enough cred that you could call these manufacturers out to make home products that look good yet still have the functionality needed to cover the area.

    Reply
    • I don’t, Mark — I wish. Also, ugly or not is subjective. Please respect the comment rules on no unsolicited bashing/praising any product/brand, etc. Thanks.

      Reply
      • OK, taken. But I think _you_ can comment on the size and appearance of products in your reviews — and then maybe the manufactures will listen. That will carry more weight than individual comments. Products sometimes have to fit on shelves and be visible in rooms. I think aesthetics and form factors (I found Orbis to be too tall to fit in some spaces, so went with a different product [hoping this aside is not considered to be bash!] are legitimate to mention as well as functionality. If someone mentioned some other sort of problem with setup or usage, I hope you would not consider that bashing. In short, I’d like to see you cover this sort of thing as well in your articles.

        Reply
  5. hi Dong,

    when will you be reviewing the deco xe200 and will you measure the power conssumption in the review?

    thanks

    Reply
  6. I received my AXE300 on Friday and have enjoyed configuring it to my liking. The speed of the WIFI and the 10Gbps is outstanding. Setting up the DDNS and OpenVPN was very simple. I also decided to link all my MAC addresses to the DHCP IP assignments. If not, the router shows a leased timed assignment for each IP. After linking the MAC address the router reported the IP assignments as “permanent”, so I assume the lease time won’t expire (not tested tho). Not sure exactly what all that means, but I wanted all my IoT devices to always be connected so I hope it was worth it. I have over 40 ethernet nodes and doing the configuration was fairly painless. I found it was easier to just let the devices receive a DHCP address then use the “Add” feature rather than typing in all the MAC addresses. If I made a mistake, I simply blacklisted the device, then removed it from the blacklist so the router would re-issue an IP address that I wanted.

    With 4 different WIFI frequencies, 2.4Ghz, 5Ghz-1, 5Ghz-2, and 6Ghz, i was kind of hoping I could manage which device went on the WIFI frequency I wanted. That isn’t possible. I’ve configured the router for future mesh devices. So, all 4 frequencies have the same SSID, encryption, password, etc. When hitting the router with a WIFI device, the router chooses which frequency the device uses. If it is possible to assign frequencies to specific devices, I sure couldn’t find it. As pointed out in this article, it is also very disappointing the router can’t use wired backhauls because of the OneMesh. Anyway, overall, I am very happy with the router so far. I would rate it a 9 out of 10 with the hopes that one day the OneMesh will be updated for wired backhaul.

    Reply
  7. The most important thing in my opinion is the use of SFP+ fiber directly to the WAN port, there are very few routers (I know only Keenetic) that can support GPON or XGS-PON SFP+ and not all ISP give the SFP+ with media converter instead the all-in-one ONT.
    I think it would be interesting to know if there are a compatibility SFP GPON/XGS-PON list like Keenetic routers.

    Reply
    • I received the AXE300 two days ago and tested across my house > 3500 sq ft. Signal strength remains very strong from the router to about 200ft linear ft. It literally blankets large swath of area. Even behind 4 walls, it clocked 350k speed. No need to any mesh non-sense.

      Speeds are quite good, consistency was great. I have 1gpbs FIOS. On wi-fi 6, got consistently over 500k, upload was 280k.

      I also have Asus AXE16000. It is also similar range but the upload speed was mere 10k due to some FIOS ONT box issue.

      I may keep the TPlink and return the Asus. But will keep testing.

      Reply
  8. Hello Dong!

    Just bought the Asus ET12, wondering if I should swap for this router. I want to upgrade my NAS and main PC both to 10GBE, but I’m wondering if having those on a dedicated switch will give better performance as I’ve seen you mention most routers wont reach full 10Gbit/s on their ports.

    If possible could you test the ethernet throughput in your review? Also very curious to know if TP-Link forces you to sign-in to a cloud account for this router and/or what features are locked behind an account/paywall. I read your article on router privacy and that’s one thing I really like about the ET12, no need for cloud nonsense. This quick look mentions QoS is behind a paywall, so far that isn’t looking good as that’s a pretty basic feature no?

    Thank you!

    Reply
  9. Thanks Dong for this quick sneak peak of the new AXE300.

    Quick question, this will be a good option instead of the ASUS AXE16000?. I know you are preparing a deep review of this new TP-Link model but I will like to pre-order it with a confidence is going to be a good option instead of the AXE16000.

    Thanks

    Reply
    • As a standalone router, I think it’s an excellent option judging from the specs, Moises. The 10GbE/SFP+ combo port is definitely a bonus. But we’ll need to wait and see.

      Reply
  10. This would have been a buy for me if it featured wired backhaul in OneMesh. Does the DecoXE200 have wired backhaul? If yes, pity that the company chooses to segment its products like this. I was looking at its domestic website at what looks like the AXE300’s predecessor, the TP-Link XTR10890 released in 4Q2021 only for their domestic market, and there is a description of OneMesh 2.0 which seems to allow both wireless and wired backhaul (RJ45 and SFP+). Wonder why that feature didn’t make it into the AXE300…

    Reply
    • It’s not model-specific, Richard. OneMesh just doesn’t support wired backhauling (for now) and has no good satellite option (for this router at least.) Deco generally supports wired backhaul automatically. I’m not aware of TP-Link’s products for its domestic market, but they will not work in the US anyway, not until certified.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

πŸ“Œ