🛒
Since late 2021 and especially during 2022, Wi-Fi 7 has been the talk of the networking town. And while you likely won’t be able to experience it until late 2023 or even early 2024, you can get your home partially ready for it in a few short months.
Indeed, determined to be the first on the market, TP-Link today, in a special event aptly called “Hi, Wi-Fi 7“, announced an extensive collection of Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters (routers/access points) encompassing its multiple business segments.
A bit of a PTSD: TP-Link’s announcements today remind me of its enthusiasm toward Wi-Fi 6E back in early 2021, of which the then products eventually turned vaporware.
TP-Link cited the pandemic as the reason for missing its original deadlines and eventually managed to keep most of its subsequent Wi-Fi 6E promises by late 2022.
With the pandemic now on the way out, there’s a chance the networking vendor will soon turn Wi-Fi 7 into a reality, albeit only on the broadcasting end.
And that’s exciting.
TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 hardware: The new standard is now (almost) a reality
TP-Link doesn’t hold back when it comes to the latest Wi-Fi standard. The company today debuted not one, not five, but nine new consumer products that support Wi-Fi 7, including four Archer routers, three Deco mesh systems, and two Omada business access points.
It’s important to note that the new products are all on the broadcasting side and are just half of the requirements for an actual Wi-Fi 7 experience. The other half is on the receiving end – devices/clients that support this standard. And for those, you’ll need to wait a year or so longer.
In the meantime, these new broadcasters support existing Wi-Fi clients—they will not be useless, far from it. In other words, you can get them even when you don’t have any Wi-Fi 7 devices yet.
Wi-Fi 7 devices, when available, will also support existing broadcasters. So if you’re happy with your current Wi-Fi 6 or 6E performance, Wi-Fi 7 is not a must-have and will be so for years.
If you’re new to the latest Wi-Fi standard, this primer post on Wi-Fi 7 will offer all the details, or you can open the drawer below for quick highlights.
Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) in brief
Four key improvements of Wi-Fi 7
The new Wi-Fi standard, technically known as 802.11be, encompasses all previous Wi-Fi revisions with many new features—some still being worked out. However, you can remember four essential items below.
1. The all-new 320MHz channel width
The first thing to note about Wi-Fi 7 is its new and much wider channel width, up to 320MHz, which is double that of Wi-Fi 6/6E.
This new channel width is generally available on the 6GHz band, with up to three 320MHz channels.
Details of Wi-Fi channels can be found here, but the new channel width generally means Wi-Fi 7 can double the base speed, from 1.2Gbps per stream (160MHz) to 2.4Gbps per stream (320MHz).
So, in theory, just from the width alone, a 4×4 broadcaster 6GHz Wi-Fi 7 can have up to 9.6Gbps of bandwidth, or 10Gbps when rounded up.
Wi-Fi 7 also supports twice as many partial streams, up to 16. As a result, technically, a 16-stream (16×16) Wi-Fi 7 6GHz band can deliver over 40Gbps of bandwidth, especially when considering the new QAM support below.
Like Wi-Fi 6 and 6E, initially, Wi-Fi 7 will be available as dual-stream (2×2) and quad-stream (4×4) broadcasters and dual-stream clients. In the future, the standard might have 8×8 broadcasters and single-stream or quad-stream clients.
Again, you need a compatible client to use the new 320MHz channel width. Existing clients will connect using 160MHz at best. In reality, the 160MHz will likely be the realistic sweet-spot bandwidth of Wi-Fi 7, just like the 80MHz in the case of Wi-Fi 6.
2. The 4K-QAM
QAM, short for quadrature amplitude modulation, manipulates the radio wave to pack more information in the Hertz.
Wi-Fi 6 supports 1024-QAM, which itself is already impressive. However, Wi-Fi 7 will have four times that, or 4096-QAM. Greater QAM means better performance for the same channel width.
As a result, Wi-Fi 7 will be much faster and more efficient than previous standards when working with supported clients.
Wi-F 7 vs. Wi-Fi 6/6E: The realistic real-world speeds
With the support for the wider channel width and higher QAM, Wi-Fi 7 is set to be much faster than previous standards on paper.
You might have read somewhere that Wi-Fi 7 is “up to 4.8 times faster than Wi-Fi 6,” and hardware vendors will continue to combine the theoretical bandwidth of a broadcaster’s all bands into a single colossal number, such as BE19000, BE22000, or BE33000, which is excellent for advertising.
As always, these numbers don’t mean much, and things are not that simple. In reality, a Wi-Fi connection generally happens on a single band at a time—that’s always true for Wi-Fi 6E and older clients—and is also limited by the client’s specs.
The table below summarizes what you can expect from Wi-Fi 7’s real-world organic performance compared to Wi-Fi 6E when working on the 6GHz.
| Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 | |
| Max Channel Bandwidth (theoretical/top-tier equipment) | 160MHz | 320MHz |
| Channel Bandwidth (widely implemented) | 80MHz | 160MHz |
| Number of Available Channels | 7x 160MHz, or 14x 80MHz channels | 3x 320MHz, or 7x 160MHz channels, or 14x 80MHz channels |
| Highest Modulation | 1024-QAM | 4096-QAM |
| Max Number of Spatial Streams (theoretical on paper / commercially implemented) | 8 / 4 | 16 / 4 |
| Max Bandwidth Per Stream (theoretical) | 1.2Gbps (at 160MHz) 600Mbps (at 80MHz) | ≈ 2.9Gbps (at 320MHz) ≈ 1.45Gbps (at 160MHz) |
| Max Band Bandwidth (theoretical on paper) | 9.6Gbps (8×8) | 46.1Gbps (16×16) |
| Commercial Max Band Bandwidth Per Band (commercially implemented) | 4.8Gbps (4×4) | 11.5Gbps (4×4) |
| Available Max Real-world Negotiated Speeds(*) | 2.4Gbps (via a 2×2 160MHz client) 1.2Gbps (via a 2×2 80MHz client) | ≈ 11.5Gbps (via a 4×4 320MHz client) ≈ 5.8Gbps (via a 2×2 320MHz client or a 4×4 160MHz client) ≈ 2.9Gbps (via a single stream 320MHz client or a 2×2 160MHz client) ≈ 1.45Gbps (via a single stream 160MHz client or a 2×2 80MHz client) |
| Available Clients (examples) | 2×2 (Intel AX210) | 2×2 (Intel BE200 / Qualcomm NCM865) |
(*) The actual negotiated speed depends on the client, Wi-Fi 7 specs, and environment. Real-world sustained rates are generally much lower than negotiated speeds, capping at about two-thirds at best. Wi-Fi 6/6E has had only 2×2 clients. Wi-Fi 7 will also use 2×2 clients primarily, but it might have 4×4 and even single-stream (1×1) clients.
Like Wi-Fi 6 and 6E, Wi-Fi 7 has been available only in 2×2 specs on the client side. That, plus the sweet-spot 160MHz channel width, means, generally, it’s safe to conservatively expect real-world rates of the mainstream Wi-Fi 7 (160MHz) to be about 20% faster than top-tier Wi-Fi 6E (160MHz) counterparts.
However, the new standard does have more bandwidth on the broadcasting side. So, it can handle more 2×2 clients simultaneously with high-speed real-world rates. And that’s always a good thing.
3. Multi-Link Operation
Multi-Link Operation, or MLO, is the most exciting and promising feature of Wi-Fi 7 that changes the norm of Wi-Fi: Up to Wi-Fi 6E, a Wi-Fi connection between two direct devices occurs in a single band at a time.
With MLO, two or more Wi-Fi bands can be combined or bonded into a single link—single SSID—similar to Link Aggregation of wired connections.
However, MLO can be complicated, and since the 6GHz band has just about 75% of the range of the 5GHz when the same broadcasting power is applied, this feature can only be significant with the help of Wi-Fi 7’s fifth and optional feature, Automated Frequency Coordination, mentioned below.
4. Flexible Channel Utilization (FCU) and Multi-RU
Flexible Channel Utilization (FCU) (a.k.a. Preamble Puncturing) and Multi-RU are two other items that help increase Wi-Fi 7’s efficiency. With FCU, Wi-Fi 7 handles interference more gracefully by slicing off the portion of a channel with interference, 20MHz at a time, and keeping the clean part usable.
In contrast, in Wi-Fi 6/6E, when there’s interference, an entire channel can be taken out of commission. FCU is the behind-the-scenes technology that increases Wi-Fi’s efficiency, similar to the case of MU-MIMO and OFDMA.
Similarly, with Wi-Fi 6/6E, each device can only send or receive frames on an assigned resource unit (RU), which significantly limits the flexibility of the spectrum resource scheduling. Wi-Fi 7 allows multiple RUs to be given to a single device and can combine RUs for increased transmission efficiency.
5. Automated Frequency Coordination
Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) is an optional feature and deals with the 6GHz band, so it’s not Wi-Fi 7-exclusive—the band was first used with Wi-Fi 6E. It’s not required for a Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster’s general function. In fact, it wasn’t even mentioned in the initial certification by the Wi-Fi Alliance.
Due to local regulations, the 6GHz band’s availability, hence, the implementation of the AFC feature, differs around the world. For this reason, some Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters, such as the Asus RT-BE88U or the TP-Link Archer BE230, forgo this band to remain dual-band.
Still, Wi-Fi 7 makes AFC more relevant than ever. That’s because the 6GHz band has the highest bandwidth (fastest) yet the shortest range compared to the 5GHz and 2.4GHz bands when using the maximum allowed broadcasting power. Originally, AFC was intended only for outdoor applications, but when implemented, it’s significant for all applications.
Here’s how AFC works when/if available:
The feature enables a 6GHz broadcaster to check with a registered database in real-time to confirm that its operation will not negatively impact other existing registered members. Once that’s established, the broadcaster creates a dynamically exclusive environment in which its 6GHz band can operate without the constraint of regulations.
Specifically, the support for AFC means each Wi-Fi 7 broadcaster can use higher broadcasting power and more flexible antenna designs to have higher signal output.
AFC can increase the broadcasting power up to 36 dBm (from the current 30 dBm limit) or 4 watts (from 1 watt). In practice, the 6GHz will get 6 dBm more than the original non-AFC max allowed power, whichever it is, since hardware is often certified for lower than the 30 dBm threshold. The goal is to make the range of the 6GHz band comparable to that of the 5GHz band—about 25% more. When that happens, the MLO feature above will be truly powerful.
Still, even then, Wi-Fi 7’s range will remain the same as that of Wi-Fi 6, which is available only on the 5GHz band. However, AFC makes its 6GHz band better than the case of Wi-Fi 6E.
This feature requires certification, and its availability is expected to vary from one region to another. Hardware released before that is said to be capable of handling AFC, which, when applicable, can be turned on via firmware updates.
Tip
Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) extends the Wi-Fi range of the 6GHz band to be comparable to that of the 5GHz band via special rules.
The feature is similar to checking with the local authorities for permission to close off sections of city streets for a drag race block party.
When approved, the usual traffic and parking laws no longer apply to the area, and the organizers can determine how fast traffic can flow, etc.
Hardware vendors generally prioritize compliance and compatibility over performance, so AFC is not the priority, and it will be available only in select Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters.
The quick takeaway is that Wi-Fi 7 is faster and, thanks to the support for AFC, will likely increase the range of the 6GHz band a great deal—limited range has proven to be the biggest shortcoming of this band in existing Wi-Fi 6E broadcasters.
With that, let’s check out the new hardware TP-Link unveiled today.
Four TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Archer standalone routers: Multi-Gig is now the norm
TP-Link’s Archer has been one of the go-to brands for those needing a single broadcaster in a home.
With the support for the 6GHz band, all Wi-Fi 7 broadcasters are generally expected to be tri-band since they all need the 5GHz and 2.4GHz for backward compatibility and the MLO feature mentioned above.
TP-Link’s new Wi-Fi 7 router models include the Archer BE900, Archer BE800, Archer BE550, and Archer GE800. All of them have two or more Multi-Gig ports. Some don’t even have any Gigabit ports.
The “BE” notion in the model names conveys the fact that they support the 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) standard, just like “AXE” (such as in the Archer AXE300) and “AX” (Archer AX11000) are for hardware supporting Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 6.
TP-Link says all of its new Wi-Fi 7 routers support Wi-Fi EasyMesh, the direction it wants to steer the OneMesh approach. We’ll need to wait to see how that pans out.
Wi-Fi EasyMesh in a nutshell
Wi-Fi EasyMesh is Wi-Fi Alliance’s certification program, first announced in early 2020, that aims to simplify the building of mesh systems by creating universal mesh protocols. The idea is that any Wi-Fi EasyMesh-certified hardware from any vendor will work with one another to form a seamless Wi-Fi mesh system. Per the organization, here are the highlights of EasyMesh:
- Increased network capacity: Supports more simultaneous services and higher realized throughput when operating in Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E
- Flexible design: Allows for the best placement of multiple APs to provide extended coverage
- Easy setup: Delivers seamless, secure device onboarding and configuration using QR codes through Wi-Fi Easy Connect technology
- Network intelligence: Advanced diagnostics for Wi-Fi 6 capabilities through Wi-Fi Data Elements facilitate service provider support and respond to network conditions to maximize performance
- Effective service prioritization and Quality of Service (QoS) support: Capability to prioritize low-latency applications when needed and guide devices to roam to the best connection and avoid interference
- Scalability: Enables the addition of Wi-Fi EasyMesh APs from multiple vendors
The adoption of the new program has proven slow. By late mid-2023, only Netgear and TP-Link had joined the movement.
The former uses it in its Nighthawk purpose-built mesh family, first represented by the MK63 and MK83—none are standalone routers. TP-Link, on the other hand, started transitioning its OneMesh—available in standalone routers—into TP-Link EasyMesh in August 2022.
In real-world trials, the EasyMesh hardware of TP-Link and Netgear has never worked together, and it is unlikely that it will ever do so. Understandably, both TP-Link and Netgear recommend their hardware, EasyMesh or not.
Generally, we need the hardware of at least two vendors working together to know that Wi-Fi EasyMesh is universal. But then, things can get complicated in terms of liability or tech support. If a mixed Wi-Fi EasyMesh system is not working as expected, it’s hard to know which hardware vendor is at fault, and consumers might be stuck between two networking companies that point fingers at each other.
Of these new routers, the flagship Archer BE900 is the only one that’s a quad-band broadcaster, similar to the recently released Archer AXE300. The additional band is to increase the bandwidth on the 5GHz.
The Archer GE800 is TP-Link’s first Wi-Fi 7 gaming router—replacing the Archer GX90 or Archer AX11000. The company says it has “quad acceleration features for games” to deliver “exceptional performance for the most intense gaming networks.” The new router has a pretty radical design, looking like a landed Imperial Shuttle spacecraft in Star Wars.
Other details of the new Archer Wi-Fi 7 routers are still sketchy. The table below includes all the currently available information on them.
TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Archer routers: Quick hardware specifications
 |  |  |  | |
| Name | TP-Link Archer BE900 BE24000 Quad-Band Wi-Fi 7 Router | TP-Link Archer BE800 Tri-Band BE19000 Wi-Fi 7 Router | TP-Link Archer BE550 Tri-Band BE9300 Wi-Fi 7 Router | TP-Link Archer GE800 Tri-Band BE19000 Wi-Fi 7 Gaming Router |
| Model | Archer BE900 | Archer BE800 | Archer BE550 | Archer GE800 |
| Wi-Fi Bandwidth | Quad-band BE24000 | Tri-Band BE19000 | Tri-Band BE9300 | Tri-Band BE19000 |
| Bandwidth per Band | 2.4 GHz: 1376 Mbps 5 GHz-1: 5760 Mbps 5 GHz-2: 5760 Mbps 6 GHz: 11520 Mbps | 2.4 GHz: 1376 Mbps 5 GHz: 5760 Mbps 6 GHz: 11520 Mbps | 2.4 GHz: 574 Mbps 5 GHz: 2880Mbps 6 GHz: 5760Mbps | 2.4 GHz: 1376 Mbps 5 GHz: 5760 Mbps 6 GHz: 11520 Mbps |
| EHT320 Support (320MHz on 6 GHz Band) | Yes | |||
| Multi-Gig Ports | 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN (RJ45/SFP+ Combo) 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN 4× 2.5Gbps LAN | 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN (RJ45/SFP+ Combo) 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN 4× 2.5Gbps LAN | 1× 2.5Gbps WAN 4× 2.5Gbps LAN | 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN (RJ45/SFP+ Combo) 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN 2× 2.5Gbps LAN |
| Gigabit Ports | 1×Gbps LAN | None | 4× 1Gbps LAN | |
| USB Ports | 1× USB 3.0 1× USB 2.0 | 1x USB 3.0 | 1× USB 3.0 1× USB 2.0 | |
| Features | LED Screen EasyMesh-Compatible | EasyMesh-Compatible | 5 GHz Gaming Band Abundant Gaming Acceleration Features Quad Acceleration for Games Gaming Panel | |
| MSRP (US) | $699.99 | $599.99 | $299.99 | TBD |
Three TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Deco mesh systems: Gigabit ports are no longer
TP-Link’s Wi-Fi 7 Deco mesh hardware retains a similar cylindrical shape but with one significant change: It now tapers toward the top instead of the bottom.
This new design likely helps the broadcasters to stay more stable on a surface than the case of some previous Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 6 counterparts, such as the Deco AX5700 or Deco XE200.
The hardware of different grades comes in various physical sizes, but the appearance remains the same.
Another significant change: The Gigabit port is no longer. All TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 mesh variants, including the Deco BE95, Deco BE85, and Deco BE65, come with multiple Multi-Gig ports, either a few 2.5GbE, some 10GbE, or a mix of those.
The Deco BE95 and BE85 also support SFP+ by having a 10GbE Multi-Gig/SFP+ combo port. This type of combo port was first available in the Archer AXE300, giving consumers extra flexibility.
SFP+ in brief
Multi-Gig (Base-T) vs. SFP+
BASE-T (or BaseT) is the standard port type for data communication and refers to the wiring method, which is 8-position 8-contact (8P8C), used inside a network cable and the connectors at its ends.
This type is known by a misnomer called Registered Jack 45 or RJ45. So, we’ll keep calling it RJ45.
On the other hand, the SFP, nowadays with its popular SFP+ (plus) rendition, is used for telecommunication and data communication, primarily in enterprise applications. SFP stands for Small Form Factor Pluggable and is the technical name for what is often referred to as Fiber Channel or Fiber.
For data communication, an SFP+ port generally has speed grades of either 1Gbps or 10 Gbps. The older version, SFP, can only do 1 Gbps, though it shares the same port type as SFP+. This type of port standard is stricter in terms of compatibility with better reliability and performance.
SFP can also be more flexible in term of speed grades, and has other forms that can offer faster-than-10Gbps bandwidth, such as SFP28 that has 25Gbps ceiling speed.
While physically different, BASE-T and SFP/+ are parts of the Ethernet family, sharing the same networking principles and Ethernet naming convention—Gigabit Ethernet (1Gbps), Multi-Gig Ethernet (2.5GBASE-T, 5GBASE-T), or 10 Gigabit Ethernet (a.k.a 10GE, 10GbE, or 10 GigE).
Generally, you can get an adapter, called a “transceiver”, to connect a BASE-T device to an SFP or SFP+ port. Still, in this case, compatibility can be an issue—a particular adapter might only work (well) with the SFP/+ port of certain hardware vendors.
The BASE-T wiring is more popular thanks to its simple design and speed support flexibility. Some routers and switches have an RJ45/SFP+ combo, which includes two physical ports of each type, but you can use one at a time.
TP-Link Deco BE95: First Dual-6GHz quad-band hardware
Among the three new Decos, the Deco BE95 is the flagship, and it’s also the first quad-band broadcaster with two 6GHz bands.
Previously all quad-band broadcasters, including the Asus GT-AX16000, Netgear Orbi RBRE960, or TP-Link Archer AXE300, come with two 5GHz bands.
With two 6GHz bands, the Deco BE950 can use one as the dedicated backhaul. How that works out remains to be seen, but with the help of Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC), which allows higher broadcasting power, there’s a chance this band can overcome its innate short range, like in the case of existing Wi-Fi 6E mesh systems.
Generally, all tri-band Wi-Fi 6E broadcasters have difficulty making their 6GHz effective. The high frequency and 30dBm max broadcasting power make this band suitable only for open spaces. Wi-Fi 7 might change this via the support for AFC.
The table below includes the current information on the new Wi-Fi 7 Deco hardware.
TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Deco systems: Quick hardware specifications
 |  | | |
| Name | TP-Link Deco BE95 BE33000 Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi 7 System | TP-Link Deco BE85 BE22000 Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi 7 System | TP-Link Deco BE65 BE11000 Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi 7 System |
| Wi-Fi Bandwidth | Quad-band BE33000 | Tri-Band BE22000 | Tri-Band BE11000 |
| Bandwidth per Band | 2.4GHz: 1148Mbps 5GHz (*): 8640Mbps 6GHz-1: 11520Mbps 6GHz-2: 11520Mbps | 2.4GHz: 1376Mbps 5GHz (*): 8640Mbps 6GHz: 11520Mbps | 2.4GHz: 574Mbps 5 GHz (*): 4320Mbps 6GHz: 5760Mbps |
| EHT320 Support (320MHz on 6 GHz Band) | Yes | ||
| Multi-Gig Ports | 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN (RJ45/SFP+ Combo) 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN 2× 2.5Gbps WAN/LAN | 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN (RJ45/SFP+ Combo) 1× 10Gbps WAN/LAN 2× 2.5Gbps LAN | 4× 2.5Gbps WAN/LAN |
| Gigabit Ports | None | ||
| USB Ports | 1× USB 3.0 | ||
| Features | AI-Driven Mesh Ethernet Backhaul Router/AP Mode | ||
| US MSRP | $1199.99 (2-pack) | $999.99 (2-pack) | $799.99 (3-pack) |
(*) Due to local regulations on the spectrum, the 5 GHz band of the EU version cannot have 240MHz channel bandwidth and has approximately 67% of bandwidth compared to the corresponding US versions.
Two TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Omada business access points: The fun of DIY mesh continues
If you’ve never heard of TP-Link’s Omada access points, they are excellent ways to add Wi-Fi coverage to an existing network. And if you live in a large home or have a large business, a couple of them and a controller will work as a robust Wi-Fi mesh system.
This segment of the broadcasters has been available since Wi-Fi 5, and I recently reviewed some of the Wi-Fi 6 options. They all proved excellent alternatives to canned mesh systems, including TP-Link’s own Deco.
And for Wi-Fi 7, TP-Link introduced the Omada EAP770 and Omada EAP780. Both are PoE access points supporting PoE++ 10GbE Multi-Gig. The former has a single port, and the latter has an additional 10GbE port.
The two are tri-band broadcasters with a total bandwidth of 11000Mbps and 2200Mbps, respectively. Either works as a standalone solution, or you can use multiple units to create a seamless mesh, as mentioned above.
The table below includes all available, though likely incomplete, information on the new Omada access points.
TP-Link Wi-Fi 7 Omada business access points: Quick hardware specifications
|  | |
| Name | TP-Link Omada EAP780 BE22000 Ceiling Mount Tri-Band Wi-Fi 7 Access Point | TP-Link Omada EAP770 BE11000 Ceiling Mount Tri-Band Wi-Fi 7 Access Point |
| Model | Omada EAP780 | Omada EAP770 |
| Wi-Fi Bandwidth | Tri-band BE2200 | Tri-band BE11000 |
| Bandwidth per Band | 2.4 GHz: 1376Mbps 5GHz {*}: 8640Mbps 6GHz: 11520Mbps | 2.4 GHz: 574Mbps 5GHz {*}: 4320Mbps 6GHz: 5760Mbps |
| Multi-Gig Ports | 2x 10GbE | 1x 10GbE |
| Gigabit Ports | None | |
| PoE Support | PoE++ (802.3bt) | |
| Features | Bluetooth Multi-Link Operation 4096-QAM Mesh Seamless Roaming MU-MIMO Private Pre-Shared Key (PPSK) Omada App Support Cloud Access Integration with Omada SDN | |
{*} Due to local regulations on the spectrum, the 5 GHz band of the EU version cannot have 240MHz channel bandwidth and has approximately 67% of bandwidth compared to the corresponding US versions.
Homeshield 3.0 and Wi-Fi 7 Aginet gateways for Internet service providers
Besides the new standard Wi-Fi 7 devices above, TP-Link also showed off its latest online security version, the HomeShield version 3.0.
The company says this next-generation security software will provide “comprehensive, advanced security features including advertisement blocker and data tracking prevention.” That’s on top of safeguarding the user’s home network and applications against external attacks.
Homeshield on existing Wi-Fi 6 and 6E hardware has been available in two flavors, free Basic and Pro, which cost $6/month. It’s unclear how HomeSheiled 3.0’s implementation will pan out, but I guess it will be similar.
Finally, TP-Link also announced new products in its Aginet family of gateways based on Archer routers and Deco mesh systems above. Aginet is TP-Link hardware explicitly made for Internet service providers and available as standalone broadcasters, mesh systems, or 5G-enabled mobile gateways. They are only available from the support ISPs.
Pricing and availability
TP-Link says the new standalone Wi-Fi 7 Archer routers and Deco mesh above will ship in the first or second quarter of 2023.
Of those, the company said you’d be able to pre-order the Archer BE900 ($699.99), the 2-pack Deco BE85 ($999.99), and the 2-pack Deco BE95 ($1199.99) as soon as December 31, 2022.
You can start saving or getting a loan today and check back in early 2023 for their in-depth reviews. That’s if the claimed availabilities turn out to be true. Judging from past experiences with TP-Link, however, I wouldn’t hold my breath.
Any idea when an TP-Link Archer GE800 review will be up? Seems to be everywhere now! Can’t wait to see your verdict.
If you can get me the router, Glen, I’ll make it a priority. If you don’t have it, here’s the donation page. Otherwise, you just have to wait and see. 🙂
Hi Doug, You often talk about the benefits of a wired backhaul, but can you recommend products for an inverse topology whereby the backhaul must be wireless and the fronthaul must be wired? I’ve been having a hard time finding compact satellites with 6 (min) LAN ports so maybe each satellite should instead consist of a travel size WiFi extender (wired clients don’t roam) having a single 10Gbps port connected to a compact 6 port switch? If that make sense, do you have a recommendation for this configuration (i.e., single broadcaster plus 1-3 “compact” satellites using strictly wired fronthaul)?
Thank you very much!
There’s no 🦄 in networking, HW. You might want to read this post. If so, take your time with it.
In any case, I don’t do nonsense, so count me out if you wanted to follow up. But a bit of attention will help.
Speaking of attention, the name is Dong. 🙂
My deep apologies for misspelling your name Dong!😳
Thank you as always for the prompt response. I am a little surprised that there are not more applications with legacy (pre-WiFi) client hardware in separate rooms whereby it’s not cost effective to upgrade the clients nor to wire between the rooms. I guess that’s what Ethernet-to-WiFi adapters are for.
Yesterday I setup the newly release 3-piece TP-Link BE85 mesh WiFi. WoW! Am I impressed! I updated to the latest firmware. All 75 devices in my house connected no problem. I’m upgrading from the TP-Link Deco M5. HUGE improvement! All my Ring cameras outside stay connected now and their signal strength has immensely improved. I easily get 1,000Mbps over WiFi now on my laptop with WiFi 6.
I don’t care that WiFi 7 isn’t certified yet. THIS is the mesh WiFi I have been waiting for because of two things: 1. Multiple multi-gig ports on a mesh router, and; 2. 160Mhz channel width support.
If you’re on the fence regarding TP-Links new BE85, get it! You won’t be disappointed. I have them all setup on 2.5GbE wired backhaul support. My phone and laptop roam seamlessly around the house perfectly just like the M5 units.
My only complaint is that HomeShield Pro does not seem to do a good job at at blocking malicious websites. I enabled the free trial, but when visiting many websites listed on PhishTank website, TP-Link is literally not blocking any of the websites. From my understanding it’s now powered by Norton. Ewww. Netgear’s Home Armor is powered by Bitdefender. I will give Netgear credit where it’s deserved. Their Home Armor product is the best router security that I’ve tested over the years.
You should use the 10Gbps backhaul. The wireless backhaul is already better than 2.5Gbps in ideal conditions. Thanks for the input. I’m under NDA as when I can publish my take on it. 🙂
Both 10Gbps ports are being used. 1 connected to my ONT and the other connected to my computer.
I guess I could connect my computer to one of the 2.5Gbps ports on the BE85 router. However, my next gaming computer is going to either have a 5Gbe or 10Gbe port, which brings me back to the second 10GbE port being used by my computer.
The key word is “ideal” conditions. I always preferred wired. I think you do too if I remember correctly from your previous posts. I won’t know if the 2.5Gbps wired backhaul is the bottleneck until WiFi 7 devices come out. Since I haven’t been able to get more than 1,100Mbps download over WiFi, I will stay with keeping everything wired to my 2.5GbE unmanaged switch for wired backhaul support.
Or you can get a switch. 🙂
But, sure, you’re fine as is.
Oh, duh! lol Yes, I could do that. However, in my setup I would need two 10GbE switches. That’s over $600 right now (doh!) The 2.5GbE switch was only $100. Maybe in a few years if I see the need to upgrade to get maximum bandwidth I will and maybe 10GbE switch prices will come down by then. Thanks, Dong!
👍. 2.5Gbps is plenty fast.
In the last 24 hours, I have setup the Wifi 7 BE800 in my home for standalone use. Wifi performance, range and reliability are excellent so far. I have no 6E or 7 devices to test the 6HZ spectrum- but so far I am pleased with 2.4/5 GHZ performance/range. My fastest device (network wise) the S22 Ultra receives data at my Internet plan’s maximum speed.
I am at least hopeful the router may eventually meet the requirements for full Wifi 7 certification- though only time will tell.
The 2- 10 GHZ WAN/LAN ports (one with SFP) and the remaining 4- 2.5 GB ports are impressive- and hopefully when coupled with strong processing internals-will provide for significant added capabilities over the next 6-24 months. For example, I am anticipating increasing network speed to at least 2.5 GB/s over the course of the year and may purchase devices that can take advantage of the wired multi gig ports.
Setup was easy and the overall experience has been solid. the IOT network capability was helpful and Homeshield Pro appears to work well for security.
Nice! Thanks for sharing the experience, Lowell. 🙂
Actually I have the S22 Ultra which I just realized does support Wi-Fi 6E (6Ghz). It is super fast in the same room as the router-but loses a lot of performance on 6Ghz compared to 5 GHz in rooms further away. This was expected however. I believe Wi-Fi 7 devices will not be as limited in this respect.
Interesting. I have similar experiences with wifi 6 and my ASUS XT8 and iPad- fine if in the same room, but once out of sight I really don’t notice any functional different over wifi5 (and I found some relatively unused bandwidth to use in my ultra-crowded wifi neighborhood).
I’m hoping at least wifi7 because of its newness will be unused for long enough to not crowd the bandwidth too much.
Hi Eric. The key operative here is 6E, not wifi 6. 6E uses the 6GHZ spectrum and I believe routers are now constrained power-wise such that range is poor. So on my network, Wifi 6/5GHZ (S22) in the same room as the router has a 1.1 GB/sec speed on a 1.2 GB ISP plan. With 6E/6GHZ it goes to 1.3 GB/sec (I am guessing the plan is slightly over-provisioned). I also presume that as ISP plan speeds increase further, Wifi 6E will deliver more performance benefits. However the range issue, at least for many homeowners makes 6E a mixed blessing. However Wifi 7, should overcome this issue and offer comparatively very high Wifi Speeds and excellent range on the 6GHz spectrum. However I am not an expert in this area.
Of course, while 7 is downward compatible- to take advantage of this speed increase requires Wifi 7 clients.
Deco BE95 is already released on bestbuy/amazon (it’s OOS at the moment) , any plans to review it?
It’s been there as a place holder for months, Kevin. And yes, I do have plan to cover Wi-Fi 7.
Now news about wi-fi 8 is trending.
🤫
Do you believe the TP-Link Archer BE900 is superior to the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE16000 that you believe is one of the best on the market today? Talking purely on specs since the BE900 hasn’t been tested by you.
I think they are apples and oranges, Thomas. Asus is releasing Wi-Fi 7 hardware of its own that’s more comparable.
On the BE95 model, what does the Combo WAN/LAN port mean? Could I use the 10GbE port for WAN, and then buy a 1GbE SFP+ to theoretically get 5 ports on the router, or will it always just be 4 ports max?
It works as one or the other, Richard. That’s similar to the case of the Archer AXE300.
If I want mesh, but would REALLY like VPN support, would going with 2 BE900 that support EasyMesh be the same as getting the BE95 model which is mesh and has 2 units?
The dilemma is:
1. Get 2x BE900 that support EasyMesh
2. Get BE95 that does NOT support mesh, but supports mesh
Not sure what is better. EasyMesh or Mesh? Are they they same. Thank you for your input.
Oops, #2 is supposed to say: 2. Get BE95 that does NOT support VPN, but supports mesh
We have to wait and see, Richard. None of these is available yet and I’m pretty sure the final version will be different.
Hi Dong,
Will wifi 7 router make any difference (speed, performance, distance, etc.) to the existing wifi5/6 clients? Or will it be the same as if these are connected to ax router?
Likely no. Its improvement involves the 6GHz band. But in a mesh that might help with the coverage — you can potentially place the broadcaster farther apart. Everything about Wi-Fi 7 remains to be seen, though.
Was serious thinking of purchasing an AXE300, now they announce their wifi7 products, so I might as well wait.
I wonder what TP-Link’s logic was of announcing their next gen of products just as the AXE300 becomes available at retail? They must know that’s going to discourage a lot of people like me to wait.
It’ll be a while for Wi-Fi 7 to be real. The company just wanted a publicity. I’d get whatever works today.
I realize it will be a while, but I don’t absolutely need to upgrade my router right now. So I might as well just wait on wifi7, however long it takes (I suspect a year or so). Maybe a deal will come up in that time.
My biggest problem is the jammed bandwidth here, and since Asus enabled the upper 5g channels recently that seems to have helped my situation a bit.
Great read, and great news on hardware from TP-Link. Thanks for the info, Dong.
Was really hoping for some new updates to TP-Link’s OneMesh feature though. Any idea if TP-Link will release an update to support mesh (OneMesh) between existing routers?
I think the company is transitioning OneMesh over to EasyMesh, Arian. We’ll see how that goes.
why the TP-Link Archer BE900 BE24000 Quad-Band Wi-Fi 7 Router comes with a single 6GHz band and the TP-Link Deco BE95 BE33000 Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi 7 System with two 6GHz bands?
Read the entire article, please.