Deals! 🛒
The 2-pack Deco XE75 AXE5400 Tri-Band Mesh Wi-Fi 6E System, also confusingly available as the 3-pack Deco XE5300 variant, is TP-Link’s very first real Wi-Fi 6E solution. Finally.
Indeed, the networking vendor made all kinds of buzz about the new standard in early 2021 with nothing to show during the entire year. And then, it recommitted the Wi-Fi 6E promise in early 2022.
And now, when the world is getting excited about Wi-Fi 7, the XE75 is here.
So, the new Wi-Fi solution is late to the game — it’s the 6th Wi-Fi 6E mesh on the market so far — but you already knew that if you had read my reviews on the rest of them (save the no-good eero Pro 6e).
Consequently, you might find this review a bit predictable. My mantra has been how Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E is generally not a great idea for a fully wireless environment but is excellent for a wired home. And that applies in this case, too.
So let’s cut to the chase: If you want a reliable wireless mesh system with relatively modest sub-Gigabit performance, at the suggested retail price of just $299.99 for a 2-pack, the XE75 is a great, if not the best to date, Wi-Fi 6E deal. It’s the most affordable by far.
On the other hand, if you buy into the marketing that tends to pick (the speed of the 6GHz band) and choose (the range of the 2.4GHz band), you’ll be utterly disappointed.
Table of Contents
TP-Link Deco XE75 AXE5400: A typical Deco set, now with Wi-Fi 6E
Despite the support for Wi-Fi 6E, the Deco XE75 is very similar to previous deco sets, including the X60 and X5700. If you have used a Deco set before, you’ll feel right at home with this one.
The review XE75 is a 2-pack system that includes two identical mesh routers. Out of the box, the two are pre-synced, you only need to set up one as the main router, and the other will automatically become a satellite unit once plugged into power.
Afterward, you can manually add more mesh units to the system to extend the coverage. That’s generally how a mesh system works anyway.
Simple design, no Multi-Gig port
Each Deco XE75 router is a relatively compact tube measuring 4.1-inch (105 mm) wide and 6.7-inch (169 mm) tall. It looks like a smart speaker.
On the front, toward the bottom, it has a little indicator status light. And on the back, there are three auto-sensing Gigabit network ports — each can work as a WAN (available only in the unit working as the router) or a LAN port depending on what you plug into it.
There’s no Multi-Gig port which is a big disappointment. And there’s no USB port either.
TP-Link Deco XE75: Hardware specifications
| TP-Link Deco XE75 AXE5400 Tri-Band Mesh Wi-Fi 6E System | |
| Model | Deco XE75 |
| Mesh Availability | 2-pack (as tested), 3-pack |
| Pre-Synced Hardware | Yes |
| Possible Dedicated Backhaul Band (default) | None (6GHz as default) |
| Wired Backhaul | Yes |
| Dimensions (WxDxH) | 4.1 × 4.1 × 6.7 in (105 × 105 × 169 mm) |
| Weight | 1.43 lbs (650 gram) |
| Wi-Fi Designation | Tri-band AXE5400 |
| 1st Band (2.4GHz) | 2 x 2 AX Up to 574Mbps (20/40MHz) |
| 2nd Band (5GHz) | 2 x2 AX Up to 2402 Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
| 3rd Band (6GHz) | 2×2 AXE Up to 2402 Mbps (20/40/80/160MHz) |
| Backward Compatibility | 802.11ac/n/g/a/b |
| Guest Network | Yes (One for each band) |
| Mobile App | Deco |
| Web User Interface | Simple (No local management) |
| AP Mode | Yes (as a router or a mesh) |
| USB Port | None |
| Gigabit Port | 3x Auto-Sensing |
| Multi-Gig Port | None |
| Link Aggregation | No |
| Dual-WAN | No |
| Processing Power | 1.7 GHz Quad-Core CPU |
| Firmware Version (at review) | 1.1.2 Build 20220224 Rel. 41924 |
| Release Date | April 2022 |
| Power Specs | Input: 100-240V (50/60Hz 0.8A) Output: 12V, 2.0A |
| Real-Word Power Consumption (router unit, per 24 hours) | ≈ 156 Wh (as tested) |
| US Retail Price (at launch) | 299.99 (2-pack) |
TP-Link Deco XE75 AXE5400: Detail photos
App-operated, simple local web interface
Like all TP-Link Deco sets, the XE75 requires a login account and is app-operated.
You must use the Deco mobile app for the setup process. And during this time, the phone (or tablet) must connect to the Internet via a cellular connection or an existing Wi-Fi.
But other than that, the setup process proved smooth in my trial. The app’s setup wizard covered all necessary steps in great detail, and I got the system up and running within less than 10 minutes without a hitch.
If you’ve used a mobile app before and can pay some attention, you’ll likely also find this a walk in the park.
After the setup, the app allows for managing the system from anywhere globally, as long as you have Internet access on your phone.
Locally, there’s also a simple web interface, accessible via the router’s default IP address (192.168.68.1) or tplinkdeco.net.
This interface has a simple network map that shows connected clients. And then, there’s an Advanced page with the system’s status, log, and low-level functions, including manual firmware updates, time-zone configurations, and a few WAN settings.
It’s worth noting that this web interface is only available after the initial app-based hardware setup. And there’s no way you can use just the web interface to manage the Deco XE75. You can’t use it to change any important essential settings of a home Wi-Fi network.
So the Deco app is the only way to use the mesh system, and all that implies.
TP-Link and your privacy
Having to sign in with an account means your hardware always connects to the vendor. In TP-Link’s case, you’ll manage your home network entirely or partially through the company.
And that translates into inherent privacy risks. Here’s TP-Link’s Privacy Policy — make sure you are comfortable with what it collects from your network.
TP-Link is headquartered in China, where the practice of online privacy, surveillance, data collection, and security might differ from the rest of the world.
Privacy is a matter of degree. While managing your network via a third party is never a good idea, data collection varies vendor by vendor.
Relatively thin on features and Wi-Fi settings
The XE75 shares the same features set as the previous Deco set. It comes with the support for Dynamic DNS — in this case, it only supports TP-Link’s free domain –, IP reservation, and port-forwarding. There’s also a simple QoS engine where you can add individual devices to the priority list.
On top of that, there’s a light version of HomeShield that include simple basic Network Protection and Parent Controls. If you subscribe for HomeShield Pro — as the app will often nag you –, which costs $6/month or $55/year, you’ll get the more in-depth version of the two.
There’s not much you can do about Wi-Fi settings other than creating a network name (SSID) and password.
After that, you can turn the radio of the 2.4GHz or 5GHz band on or off, effectively making the network 5GHz- or 2.4GHz-only.
Extra on backhaul
This extra content is part of the explainer on mesh systems.
Backhaul vs fronthaul
A Wi-Fi connection between two direct devices occurs in a single band, using a fixed channel, at any given time.
The above principle applies to all existing Wi-Fi standards. The upcoming Wi-Fi 7 might work differently.
Generally, when you use multiple Wi-Fi broadcasters, like in the case of a mesh network, there are two types of connections: fronthaul and backhaul.
Fronthaul is the Wi-Fi signal a mesh hub broadcasts outward for clients or its network ports for wired devices. It’s what we generally expect from a Wi-Fi broadcaster.
On the other hand, backhaul, a.k.a backbone, is the link between one broadcasting hub and another, be it the main router, a switch, or another satellite hub.
This link works behind the scene to keep the hardware units together as a system. It also determines the ceiling bandwidth (and speed) of all devices connected to the particular satellite hub.
The connection type, a Wi-Fi band or a network port, used for the backhaul is often referred to as the uplink. A Wi-Fi broadcaster might use one of its bands (2.4GHz, 5GHz, or 6GHz) or a network port for the uplink.
When a Wi-Fi band handles backhaul and fronthaul simultaneously, only half of its bandwidth is available to either end. From the perspective of a connected client, that phenomenon is called signal loss.
When a Wi-Fi band functions solely for backhauling, it’s called the dedicated backhaul.
In a mesh system, only traditional Tri-band hardware — those with an additional 5GHz band — can have a dedicated backhaul band without ostracizing clients of the same band.
Generally, it’s best to use a network cable for backhauling — wired backhauling. And that’s an advantage of mesh hardware with network ports. In this case, a hub can use its entire Wi-Fi bandwidth for front-hauling.
In networking, network cables are always much better than wireless in speed and reliability.
The pseudo dedicated backhaul band
As for the 6GHz, it gets interesting: By default, this band is set as the dedicated backhaul for the mesh system. But you can also make it available for clients, too.
When you choose to use the 6GHz as a dedicated backhaul, you only make this band unavailable to clients — and the system will still use its other two bands (2.4GHz or 5GHz) as backhaul when necessary.
And that is necessary in most cases since the 6GHz band’s range is very short.
When I placed the satellite unit behind a wall in my testing, the mesh immediately stopped using the 6GHz band as backhaul. I figured that out via testing — there was no way to know which band was working as backhaul via the app.
That said, there’s no point in using the 6GHz as the dedicated backhaul unless:
- You have no 6GHz clients, and
- You can place the hardware units at a relatively short distance — some 65 feet (20 meters) — from each other within a line of sight.
When you open the 6GHz band to the client, it’ll be able as a separate network name (SSID), though you can name it the same as the other two bands.
Like all applicable Deco sets, the XE75 support wired backhaul, which is also what I’d recommend for best performance.
TP-Link Deco XE75 AXE5400: Reliable sub-Gigabit performance
In my testing, the Deco XE75 did well for its hardware specs. I tested it both as a single router and a wireless mesh system.
Since it doesn’t have a Multi-Gig port, its sustained speed is generally capped below Gigabit. And compared to other Wi-Fi 6E broadcasters, it did quite well, as you can see on the chart below.
As a mesh system, I placed the satellite unit 40 feet away from the router unit within a line of sight. The numbers below are generally the best-case scenario, presumably when the 6GHz band was working as the backhaul — chances are you’ll get a lesser experience.
(Again, there was no way to know which band the system was using for its backhaul at any given time.)
5GHz is the backhaul band by default.
<6BH>: 6GHz band as backhaul (when applicable.)
<WBH>: Multi-Gig wired backhaul (when available.)
I did try the system via wired backhaul, and in that case, the satellite unit delivered similar sustained rates as the router units.
In real-world additional anecdotal testing, the Deco XE75’s performance generally topped at around 300Mbps at the satellite unit and close to 900Mbps at the router unit. Of course, the actual numbers fluctuated a great deal.
Typically, you’ll have placed the two quite far from each other, or have a wall or two in between them. In real-world usage, I placed the satellite 45 feet (14 meters) from the router, and there were a few thin walls and other household objects in between them — it was highly likely that the mesh didn’t use the 6GHz as backhaul anymore.
Via such a scenario, which might or might not be comparable to your situation, the screenshot below shows the best possible Internet speeds out of the two.
I tested that using a Pixel 6 — which, in my experience, was capable of over 1200Mbps of sustained Wi-Fi speeds — via a 10Gbps Fiber-optic connection. In case you’re curious, here’s the speed test page I used for this testing.
I did this test randomly many times over a week, using all different bands, and picked the best result for each case to show here. Hint: Your experience will be different, likely slower, especially at the router’s end.
So, if you don’t care about getting the most out of a Gigabit-class broadband connection, as you probably shouldn’t since anything over 100Mbps is enough for any applications, the Deco XE75’s real-world speeds sure will suffice. If you want more, getting your home wired is a must and maybe consider the Asus ZenWiFi Pro ET12.
As for coverage, TP-Link claims that 2-pack Deco XE75 can blanket 5,500 ft2 (511 m2) — or 7200 ft2 if you use a 3-pack — and that’s a bit of a stretch.
Clearly, in a wireless setup, we must balance range and performance. I’d say this 2-pack can handle around 4000 ft2 with decent speed. Larger than that, you will need to use a network cable to connect the two units or be content with using the 2.4GHz as backhaul, which is very slow. In any case, your mileage will vary depending on the layout of your home.
Before publishing this review, I used the Deco Xe75 for over two weeks, and it proved reliable. We had no issue with disconnections.
TP-Link Deco XE75's Rating
Pros
Wi-Fi 6E-ready with reliable and extensive coverage
Affordable
Easy to use
Cons
No Multi-Gig port, Link Aggregation, or Dual-WAN
TP-Link login account and mobile app required
No real, local web-based management
Only three network ports on each unit
Conclusion
To put in a sentence, the Deco XE75 is an affordable Wi-Fi 6E system that gets the job done with minimum effort as long as you’re OK with managing your network TP-Link’s way.
Considering the friendly retail price of $300, the 2-pack TP-Link Deco XE75 AXE5400 Tri-Band Mesh Wi-Fi 6E System is excellent. It’s proof that the eero Pro 6E, which has much worse hardware yet costs double the price, is a total ripoff.
This new system will deliver for those wanting a reliable wireless mesh for their modest network. And if you have wired your home, you can expect consistent Gigabit-class sustained speeds.
On the downside, the lack of a real, local web interface can translate into privacy risks. Also, the lackluster feature set, even when you want to spend another $6/month for the subscription add-ons, can be a deal-breaker for advanced users.
All things considered, I’d recommend the Deco XE75 with a tad of reservation. In a way, it’s a testament to the fact we can’t have everything, and sometimes, not even close to that. But even then, we might still end up with a good deal.
Hey Dong, just sharing my experience with this product. Bought it alongside an Asus XT12 during the Black Friday sales. In a medium-sized apartment with very thick walls it shines. I’m on a 1.1Ghz connection and in my office, I’m getting 800Mbps-1Ghz on a wireless backhaul connected via ethernet to the point. The XT12 point wouldn’t even connect to the router, I had to do it via ethernet. And then when I moved it back to the office it had a weak signal (yellow light). I was getting 50-100Mbps speeds. Connecting to the router without the mesh I was getting 200-300Mbps. I don’t fully understand why that is the case. The XT12 performs better than the XE75 in router-only mode, but as a mesh, it’s not even close. I know on this comment thread you are recommending the XT8, but I will be keeping the Deco and returning the Asus. As a side note, the speeds I’m getting are when using the 6Ghz band only for the wireless backhaul. If I share the band, it becomes slower. For most of the reviewers, it’s the other way around.
I think in your case, the XT12 was using the 2.4GHz band as backhaul, Sebastian. Where it you are it might need a bit of tinkering before it works as intended. But the if the Deco works better, I’d just go with it. Thanks for sharing the experience.
This is basically useless for me. It only works for a configuration where you have an internet connection coming directly into one of the units and everything else connects with wifi.
I just wanted to use these as access points. There doesn’t seem to be any way to make it work. Even when you turn on access point mode, it wants to talk to a WAN and provide DHCP addresses and NAT to clients. So you end up with double-NAT no matter what you do, and wireless clients can’t be accessed from the wired network.
Access point mode works, Sridhar. I tried it. Make sure you know what you’re doing. 🙂
Thanks for the detailed review. I have a wired network, 3 story house and internet bandwidth is 600 mbps. Is deco xe75 better than Orbi rbk753 (I assume deco has 2 antennas for each band and Orbi has 4 antennas for each band). Which provides the strong signal.?
You should never buy any Orbi if you have a wired home, Karthik. I’ve talked about that in all Orbi reviews but you can read this take on the new RBK860 for more. Make sure you *read*.
Costco currently has a member price of $299 on the 3-pack of these. Even with the compromises, I think that might make this the current winner for me.
Go for it! 🙂
Thanks for the detailed review. I’m deciding on a new wifi-mesh system and I’m just beginning to learn the ins and outs. If the ethernet ports are limited to a Gigabit and I use those for a wired backhaul, is the speed of that satellite limited to a Gigabit as well? I believe my Cat5e cables are limited to a Gigabit as well.
If you have time for a recommendation, I’d appreciate it. My home is wired with Cat5e cables. I’d use those for the backhaul. It’s 3600 sq ft. My cable internet is 600Mbps. I’m currently considering a 3-pack of the Deco X60, but I’m also considering the AXE5300, W7200, or the lower end X20.
Thanks again!
CAT5 can do 10Gbps, Ryan — more in this post.
If your place is wired, you have lots of options. I generally don’t give recommendations for any specific situation — it’s a thankless business in my experience, and I don’t have time to deal (again) with the consequences. You just need to do some good old reading and figure things out. 🙂
Thank you for your quick reply. I understand about not giving recommendations and I’m glad to learn that CAT5 is capable of Multi-gig speeds.
If a router used as a satellite only has Gigibit ports, and if that port is used for a wired backhaul, will anything connected through that router be limited to the Gigibit speed of the port, even if the router is capable of faster wi-fi speeds? Thanks again.
Check out this post, Ryan. Make sure you read before asking any more questions, please. https://dongknows.com/mesh-wi-fi-system-explained/
Is there any benefit for choosing this over the x68 (ax3600) for wireless backhaul if you are not going to use 6E for devices? They are both triband, but the XE75 uses 6ghz for the third band and the x68 uses 5ghz as the third band. If the units are going to be far apart, is it better to stick with a x68 since the range is farther for 5ghz? I imagined the XE75 wouldn’t even use the 3rd 6ghz band for backhaul and instead use the 5ghz channel anyway if the units are too far apart. Additionally the x68 has 5 antennas vs 4 on the XE75. Thanks!
Check out this post on that topic, Dan.
Thank you! So based on what you wrote:
“In reality, in a fully wireless configuration, all existing Tri-band Wi-Fi 6E mesh systems proved mediocre in my testing compared to traditional Tri-band systems because they didn’t have a dedicated backhaul band.”
…the 2.5ghz/5ghz/5ghz/ triband setup would be superior if I understand that correctly?
That’s correct, Dan, when you use wireless backhauling. Either that or Quad-band Wi-Fi 6E like the case of the GT-AXE16000 or Orbi RBKE960 . However, in this case, you need wired backhauling because wireless backhauling, no matter how fast, can only deliver so much in sustained rates due to the nature of the connection. In other words, if you want true Gigabit for faster sustained Wi-Fi speeds, you need to run network cables. If anyone tells you otherwise, either they don’t know what they are talking about or they just lie to you. 🙂
Thank you for your expertise!
👍
Hi Dong,
Great content. I got the Deco x60 wifi 6 3 mesh system from Costco almost a year ago on sale. It’s been working great but Costco will have the AXE5300 6e 3 mesh on sale soon and is wondering if this is a good upgrade.
Thanks for you time
That depends, Tom, it’s only an “upgrade” if you intend to use wired backhauling. In a fully wireless setup, chances are you won’t see much of a difference besides the support for 6E. So get it if you have gotten your home wired. By the way, it’s a variant of the Deco XE75 — read the review to find out more.
Hello Dong,
I am on CenturyLink DSL (pretty much the only option) with 50 down/5 up and using a Netgear Orbi RBK50 setup with 4 satellites. 1 satellite is in a hobby shop app. 25 yards from the back of the house where the main Orbi Router (& CenturyLink Technicolor C2000T modem is located in a back bedroom). I do *not* have a wired setup, wireless for the foreseeable future). I get ok wireless service but do have over 35 attached devices including 15 Blink cameras (used to mainly watch wildlife on our 1.3 acre property). The most distant cameras on the property and our several Ring Video Doorbells buffer constantly with live views and receiving notifications. I also run a Plex Server for Family home videos/photos and I don’t seem to get many complaints with buffering.
I ordered the XE75 on Prime Day (had gift cards, several other discounts) & it’s arriving today. I based a lot of my purchase on my Nephew’s experience with his older TP-Link Mesh system (especially outdoors). Now that I’ve been doing more research and reading about the lack of settings to configure things (like channel selection & others).
I’m wondering if I would benefit at all by switching to the XE75?
I’m even thinking about not even opening the packages (ordered 2 sets of 2) and just returning them or should I at least give it a chance and set it up to test?
Thanks for your help/advice!
For your broadband, JR, no new mesh system will improve the situation — it’s already as good as can be. Also, your Intenet is too slow for those many cameras. They upload videos to the cloud and that will kill your upload pipe really fast. More here.
I appreciate the quick response! I will just issue a return request and not even open the boxes. Guess I got caught up in the Prime frenzy before truly looking into it.
For as many devices that I do have on my network, it’s not horrible connectivity and I’m lucky to have faster DSL than the majority of my neighbors (closer to the main box).
Are there are any tweaks I can perform to make my network a “tad” better. I’m will check out your other articles and see what I can lean. Thx again!
**Sorry about the typos!**
You can try the QoS, it’ll help make things better. Also, proper hardware arrangement will improve the performance and you might want to segment the devices. In any case, considering the slow Internet speed, you will not be able to notice huge differences.
Dong,
How does this compare with a Asus XD6?
I have a new house which is wired and looking to add in a good mesh for extra wifi coverage and for gaming (of course wired in)
Internet is below 1 gig currently, your thoughts or other recommendations?
It’s about the same plus the support for the 6GHz band, Dhillon. Read the reviews for more — here’s that of the XD6. The XE75 is more similar, though inferior, to the ZenWiFi ET8.
Asus has much better features and customization.
Dong,
Adding on to this. I have a Spectrum provided router, would you recommend replacing that with a router and THEN adding in mesh? Or can I just start of with a mesh system like this, have one of them as the router and other two as access points?
I would go with the et8, but would that be ok working with the current router? The current modem is in our laundry area and even when I am on the same floor as it wifi is not consistent at all to my phone- Iphone 12 pro.
Check out this post on using the ISP-provided hardware, Dhillon.
Dong,
After reading your article I have decided to either go with a Asus AX6000 or a Asus AX11000- both are at $350 currently.
I am getting confused about which router to go with though even after reading your reviews. Any major differences between the two?
House is hardwired and running streaming mostly with some gaming.
Generally, Dhillon, if you have a sub-Gigabit Internet, either is fine. I’d recommend the GT-AX6000 if you have Gig or Gig+ broadband. More in this post.
I purchased the AXE5300 at my local Costco and love it. In my 5,500 square ft home I get great speeds everywhere except for one spot. The main and one satellite are ethernet wired and the other satellite is connected wirelessly. In the garage, I get a solid connection with high speeds but I have a security camera outside not too far from the garage and that camera gets connection drops. When I move the wired satellite into the garage, that camera suddenly gets a solid connection. If I purchased another unit and put it in the garage that would be great. I know the XE75 is a two pack but I don’t want to pay $300 for another satellite, I wish TP-link sold individual satellite units.
I’m sure it’s far too late to be helpful, but in case other readers stop by, it’s always possible to add a previous generation (and cheaper) Deco unit in your mesh. I’d consider getting an M9+ unit for the garage.
Dong,
I have a larger (wired) home with xFinity 1gbps, a wired router/firewall, and a dedicated 2.4ghz network for my IOT stuff, cameras, switches etc. I want to upgrade my primary WiFi to better support working from home, my boys zoom classes with screen shares, their online Minecraft gaming and to simplify roaming though the house.
I plan on setting up my mesh in AP mode and wired backhaul. From the specifications, test results and price point (Under $350), this Deco XE75 sounds perfect. But I am dis-enchanted with the management software and was considering 2 TPLink EAP660 AP’s. I do like the idea of full Wifi 6e support for future proofing new phones, and laptops, but not it is not a requirement.
I was wondering if you have tested the TPLink EAP660 AP yet or was planning on testing in the near future? Do you have any other recommendations?
Thanks, nu-latitude
I don’t have any specific recommendation, Nu, but you have lots of options considering you’ve gotten your place wired. Check out this post for more.
so Dong, beside guest WIFI or disabling the 5ghz entirely, there is no way we can create a separate 2.4 SSID for smart devices? Secondly, is it possible to assign IP address to certain devices (printer for example)? I’m currently an Orbi RK50 owner but thinking about switching to this.
Thanks
Guest Wi-Fi is the only way to go on this front, V. And yes, the Deco has the IP reservation feature as I mentioned.
TP-Link Deco AXE5300 is $345 at Costco which is a bargain comparing to other brand (especially against my favorite Netgear Orbi), do you think this would be an upgrade over my Orbi RBK50? Even though RBK50 is a good router, but my kids have been complaining about the drops since we have way too many devices (over 50), a lot of streaming and gaming, etc…
and last but not least, thank you for your quick response
Not really, unless you have your home wired — you need to do that considering your kids’ gaming. It’ll work about the same, maybe slightly better.
Yes sir, we got ethernet cables wired the entire home. One issue I noticed is that wired internet often dropped but wifi is still up and running. Is there any suggestion on a decent tri band mesh with a decent price that can handle over 50 plus devices and also allowing me to create a seperate 2.4ghz ssid?
Wi-Fi is about bandwidth and that of the 2.4GHz band is very low. Yes, you can get many more than 50 devices connected, but only so many can be active at a time. So the number doesn’t mean much, the bandwidth does.
If you have already gotten your home wired (good job by the way!), a Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 or Tri-band 6E mesh is the best. For your needs, I’d recommend the Asus ET8 or the Asus XD6 or a mix according to this post. All other canned systems don’t allow for flexible Wi-Fi customization.
Hi Dong, very informative review! I‘m looking to buy a new mesh wifi system for my house, and currently this system is on my radar. 3-pack of this for $350, VS. Orbi rbk753 for $440, which one do you think offers more value? My internet is around 600 Mbps up & down so either one should be a good fit?
That depends on if you have gotten your home wired or not, Scott. More in this post.
It’s a 3-story house, and I’m planning on using a full wireless setup. From what I’ve read so far, the 6GHz band is a gimmick at the moment: when exposed to the client, there are not many clients out there that can take advantage of it; when used as a “dedicated” backhaul, its range is not long enough to maintain a steady connection between the nodes. So it does seem like the Orbi set is a more reasonable choice.
You got it, Scott. Or get your home wired! That’s the only way to get Gigabit or faster Internet anway.
What are your thoughts on the Deco X55 AX3000 (3-pack)? I have several devices that need wireless connection (fridge, doorbell, two cams, multiple cellphones, 2 streaming tvs, etc).
Also, is wifi 6e really needed or is wifi 6 sufficient?
Thanks for all your reviews and looking forward to what your thoughts are on x55
I haven’t tested the Deco X55, so no thoughts on it, but it should be similar to the Deco X60. For more on Wi-Fi 6E, check out this post.
Hi Dong, do you think that for a fully wireless set up the ax5700 by Tp-link is better and possibly outperforms the axe5400? Will there be a noticeable user experience? Thank you.
No, I think the two will be similar, Ricardo. And if you can’t place the hardware units close or within the line of sight, the AX5700 will likely be better.
Do you think the combination of the XE75 (in access point mode) with something like the firewalla purple or gold would make up for the lack of features and web based management?
Yes, David, except, in the case of the Firewalla Gold (or Purple), the web-based management is relatively mediocre.
Thanks for the reply! Trying to figure out what $600 or under mesh wifi pack (so was looking at the 3 pack of the tp link you mentioned) would cover roughly 7k sq ft area (that could be paired with firewalla to make up some of the shortcomings). Currently will be all wireless but with planned wired backhaul for the mesh access points in the near future.
Great site. I just upgraded to a gigabit Internet connection and my old and trusty Google Wi-Fi is struggling to keep up on LAN. I saw your Asus XT8 review and was watching for it to go on sale. This one is $100 cheaper and seems to provide better performance than XT8. For a complete wireless LAN, would you recommend this over the XT8?
It won’t perform better than the XT8 in a wireless setup, T. My test is for the best-case scenario which you won’t have. Make sure you read the reviews in their entirety and not just look at the numbers etc. So no, go with the XT8, which has a lot more to offer than just Wi-Fi speeds.
Thanks for this great review, Dong. For a wired backhaul home, is there any combination you’d recommend over the XE75/AXE5300 three pack in the ~$350 territory? I was considering the Asus XT8 or TP Link X90 until reading your article against a non-6e tri-band setup with a wired configuration. My internet is only 400/10 (cable internet). My home is around 4,900sqft (2,450 on two levels) with plaster walls. Thanks
If you have wired backhauls, Jonathan, you should go with this one (great) or the Asus ET8 (much better) or ET12 (best).
Hi,
Thank you for the great reviews! Just got these as well in a 3 pack and I am using the 6HZ band for the wireless backhaul with a fiber connection. I can get 700 plus download speeds but the upload speeds never seem to cross over the 250 plus mark. Any reasons for why this might be?
Kris
That can be anything, Kris, including the speed of your broadband itself. More here. Also, read the review in its entiety! 🙂
Is this model comparable to the one sold by Costco (https://www.costco.com/tp-link-deco-axe5300-wi-fi-6e-tri-band-whole-home-mesh-wi-fi-system%2c-3-pack.product.100847833.html)?
I mentioned that in the first sentence of the review, TK.
You can remove the _6Ghz from the 6ghz SSID after saving. For me it added automatically, but then after removing and saving again, it works. That gives you all three bands on same SSID, which most people would likely want.
Yeap, Ai, and I mentioned that in the review. But this band still exists as a separate network (and not part of the SmartConnect of the other two).